Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
In the Neon vs Phoenix matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 80 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
The Neon vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 80 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 51.2% of the time compared to Phoenix's 46.3%, a 5.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Phoenix players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Phoenix achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Neon vs Phoenix matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Phoenix holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 80 competitive matches, Phoenix players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Neon in this matchup, converting 47.4% of attacking rounds versus 46.3%. While this 1.2 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 80 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Neon teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Neon players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Neon has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.14% | 521 | 1.27 | 143.5 | 21.3% | 49.7% | 50.7% | |
| 50.51% | 396 | 1.28 | 143.8 | 21.7% | 49.0% | ||
| 51.12% | 356 | 1.23 | 139.2 | 21.2% | 49.1% | ||
| 53.24% | 278 | 1.26 | 143.6 | 23.1% | 49.9% | ||
| 59.58% | 240 | 1.26 | 141.1 | 20.7% | 50.7% | ||
| 50.92% | 218 | 1.26 | 142.3 | 21.0% | 50.7% | ||
| 51.40% | 179 | 1.21 | 137.1 | 20.6% | 49.8% | ||
| 45.77% | 142 | 1.26 | 143.1 | 21.0% | 49.5% | ||
| 48.60% | 107 | 1.26 | 140.7 | 21.1% | 49.0% | ||
| 57.61% | 92 | 1.30 | 147.1 | 22.4% | 53.6% | ||
| 54.88% | 82 | 1.22 | 141.0 | 22.3% | 52.5% | ||
| 46.91% | 81 | 1.25 | 142.4 | 22.6% | 45.8% | ||
| 51.25% | 80 | 1.26 | 146.6 | 21.1% | 46.3% | ||
| 50.75% | 67 | 1.23 | 138.9 | 20.7% | 46.7% | ||
| 50.00% | 58 | 1.19 | 131.3 | 21.7% | 48.6% | ||
| 50.00% | 56 | 1.22 | 138.3 | 22.0% | 46.3% | ||
| 48.00% | 50 | 1.23 | 138.9 | 17.7% | 48.5% | ||
| 42.86% | 35 | 1.16 | 139.4 | 23.0% | 52.1% | ||
| 48.28% | 29 | 1.26 | 137.7 | 21.7% | 47.0% | ||
| 53.85% | 26 | 1.20 | 145.6 | 21.5% | 49.1% | ||
| 61.54% | 26 | 1.19 | 129.9 | 22.3% | 52.2% | ||
| 44.00% | 25 | 1.22 | 139.0 | 23.5% | 43.8% | ||
| 28.00% | 25 | 1.19 | 138.9 | 22.3% | 46.2% | ||
| 80.00% | 15 | 1.31 | 151.5 | 20.8% | 53.3% | ||
| 64.29% | 14 | 1.15 | 130.9 | 22.9% | 57.1% | ||
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.18 | 130.8 | 24.6% | 40.5% | ||
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.09 | 122.9 | 17.2% | 50.8% |
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
Neon has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Neon should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Neon, winning 53.7% of defense rounds compared to 52.6%. This 1.2 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Neon players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Neon should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Neon should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Neon should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Phoenix maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.4% attack win rate and 53.7% defense win rate. While Phoenix is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Neon vs Phoenix specific factors. The slight Phoenix advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Neon and Phoenix are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Phoenix has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Phoenix just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Both Neon and Phoenix fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Phoenix is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Phoenix's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
| 53.3% |
| 52.2% |
| 52.5% |
| 53.2% |
| 50.2% |
| 51.1% |
| 51.0% |
| 51.7% |
| 50.7% |
| 50.8% |
| 52.8% |
| 52.6% |
| 54.6% |
| 52.9% |
| 51.9% |
| 51.2% |
| 47.0% |
| 50.9% |
| 51.4% |
| 55.8% |
| 55.4% |
| 41.1% |
| 59.2% |
| 53.8% |
| 56.2% |
| 41.7% |
Neon vs Phoenix head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 51.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 80 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.