Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Neon
51.2% WR
VS
Phoenix
46.3% WR
Who Wins the Neon vs Phoenix Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 80
51.2%
Win Rate
46.3%
1.26
Avg KDA
1.41
15.8
Avg Kills
16.3
16.1
Avg Deaths
15.2
146.6
DMG/Round
150.4
21.1%
HS %
30.8%
227
Combat Score
227
46.3%
Attack WR
47.4%
52.6%
Defense WR
53.7%
Neon vs Phoenix Performance Breakdown
In the Neon vs Phoenix matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 80 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.26Neon
1.41Phoenix
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Neon and Phoenix, with KDA ratios of 1.26 and 1.41 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
146.6Neon
150.4Phoenix
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Neon averaging 146.6 ADR and Phoenix at 150.4 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
46.3%Neon
47.4%Phoenix
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Neon at 46.3% and Phoenix at 47.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.6%Neon
53.7%Phoenix
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Neon posting a 52.6% win rate and Phoenix at 53.7%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Neon vs Phoenix matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 80 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 51.2% of the time compared to Phoenix's 46.3%, a 5.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Phoenix players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Neon vs Phoenix Fragging Analysis
Phoenix achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Neon vs Phoenix matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Phoenix holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 80 competitive matches, Phoenix players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.26Neon
1.41Phoenix
Phoenix holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.41 compared to Neon's 1.26. While this 0.14 point difference indicates Phoenix tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Phoenix's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
15.8Neon
16.3Phoenix
Kill production between Neon and Phoenix is virtually identical, with Neon averaging 15.8 kills per game and Phoenix securing 16.3. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.1Neon
15.2Phoenix
Phoenix survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.2 times per game compared to Neon's 16.1 deaths. This 0.9 death difference per match means Phoenix is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Neon players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Phoenix's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
146.6Neon
150.4Phoenix
Phoenix applies 3.9 more damage per round than Neon in this matchup (150.4 vs 146.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Phoenix contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Neon can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
21.1%Neon
30.8%Phoenix
The headshot percentage disparity between Phoenix and Neon is substantial: 30.8% compared to 21.1%, a 9.7 point difference. Phoenix consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Phoenix in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Phoenix's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Neon vs Phoenix Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Phoenix
46.3%
47.4%
Defense Side
Phoenix
52.6%
53.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Neon in this matchup, converting 47.4% of attacking rounds versus 46.3%. While this 1.2 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 80 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Neon teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Neon players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Neon has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 80.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Neon matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 80.0% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Neon should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Neon, winning 53.7% of defense rounds compared to 52.6%. This 1.2 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Neon players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Neon should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Neon should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Neon should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Phoenix maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.4% attack win rate and 53.7% defense win rate. While Phoenix is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Neon vs Phoenix specific factors. The slight Phoenix advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Neon and Phoenix are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Phoenix has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Phoenix just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Neon and Phoenix fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Phoenix is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Phoenix's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
53.3%
52.2%
52.5%
53.2%
50.2%
51.1%
51.0%
51.7%
50.7%
50.8%
52.8%
52.6%
54.6%
52.9%
51.9%
51.2%
47.0%
50.9%
51.4%
55.8%
55.4%
41.1%
59.2%
53.8%
56.2%
41.7%
Neon vs Phoenix head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 51.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 80 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
