Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Neon
53.3% WR
VS
Sova
45.7% WR
Who Wins the Neon vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 276
53.3%
Win Rate
45.7%
1.26
Avg KDA
1.38
16.7
Avg Kills
14.8
16.4
Avg Deaths
14.6
143.1
DMG/Round
137.6
23.1%
HS %
30.7%
225
Combat Score
201
50.2%
Attack WR
47.6%
52.4%
Defense WR
49.8%
Neon vs Sova Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 276 matches reveals that Neon holds a clear advantage over Sova in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Sova shows strength in one category, Neon's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.26Neon
1.38Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Neon and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.26 and 1.38 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
143.1Neon
137.6Sova
Neon outputs 143.1 average damage per round, edging out Sova's 137.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Neon secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
50.2%Neon
47.6%Sova
Neon shows stronger attack-side performance with a 50.2% win rate versus Sova's 47.6%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Neon provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
52.4%Neon
49.8%Sova
Defensive capabilities favor Neon at 52.4% win rate compared to Sova's 49.8%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Neon provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Neon vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 276 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 53.3% of the time compared to Sova's 45.7%, a 7.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Sova consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Neon dominates this matchup statistically. Neon can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Sova should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Neon vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Sova edges out Neon in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 276 matches analyzed, this Neon vs Sova matchup remains contestable for both sides. Neon shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Neon's favor.
Avg KDA
1.26Neon
1.38Sova
Sova holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.38 compared to Neon's 1.26. While this 0.12 point difference indicates Sova tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Sova's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.7Neon
14.8Sova
Neon substantially outfrags Sova in this matchup, averaging 16.7 kills compared to 14.8 — a difference of nearly 1.9 eliminations per match. When Neon faces Sova, the data clearly shows Neon finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sova players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Neon in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
16.4Neon
14.6Sova
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 14.6 deaths per game versus 16.4. Dying nearly 1.8 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
143.1Neon
137.6Sova
Neon applies 5.6 more damage per round than Sova in this matchup (143.1 vs 137.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Neon contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Sova can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
23.1%Neon
30.7%Sova
The headshot percentage disparity between Sova and Neon is substantial: 30.7% compared to 23.1%, a 7.6 point difference. Sova consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Sova in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Sova's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Neon vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
50.2%
47.6%
Defense Side
Neon
52.4%
49.8%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Sova in this matchup, converting 50.2% of attacking rounds versus 47.6%. While this 2.6 point edge gives Neon slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Sova players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 276 competitive games suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Sova teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.6% gap.
When taking entry duels, Neon holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Sova players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Neon has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 85.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Neon matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 85.7% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Neon's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Sova should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.6 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Sova, winning 52.4% of defense rounds compared to 49.8%. This 2.6 percentage point edge suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Sova players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Neon can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.6% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Sova should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Neon demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Neon converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Sova should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Neon when you can wait for teammates. Neon can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.6% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Sova should be more conservative with eco aggression against Neon and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon holds clear advantages on both attack (50.2%) and defense (52.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Neon vs Sova matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Neon doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Neon's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Neon performs better. Sova teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Sova with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Sova's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Neon is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Neon provides a measurable ranked advantage. Sova players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Neon confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Neon wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 5.2 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Sova isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Neon) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Neon's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Neon's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Neon advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
53.2%
52.6%
52.4%
52.9%
50.2%
51.1%
50.7%
51.5%
51.1%
50.5%
52.5%
52.0%
53.9%
52.9%
52.8%
52.2%
47.0%
50.9%
55.2%
51.4%
55.4%
41.1%
60.7%
53.8%
56.2%
41.7%
Neon vs Sova head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 53.3% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 276 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
