Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Neon's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Neon
51.4% WR
VS
Chamber
47.8% WR
Who Wins the Neon vs Chamber Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 360
51.4%
Win Rate
47.8%
1.24
Avg KDA
1.27
16.4
Avg Kills
16.6
16.7
Avg Deaths
15.1
139.6
DMG/Round
141.2
21.3%
HS %
29.1%
221
Combat Score
215
49.0%
Attack WR
47.4%
52.6%
Defense WR
51.0%
Neon vs Chamber Performance Breakdown
The Neon vs Chamber matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 360 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.24Neon
1.27Chamber
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Neon and Chamber, with KDA ratios of 1.24 and 1.27 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
139.6Neon
141.2Chamber
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Neon averaging 139.6 ADR and Chamber at 141.2 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
49.0%Neon
47.4%Chamber
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Neon at 49.0% and Chamber at 47.4% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.6%Neon
51.0%Chamber
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Neon posting a 52.6% win rate and Chamber at 51.0%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Neon vs Chamber matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 360 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 51.4% of the time compared to Chamber's 47.8%, a 3.6 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Chamber consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Chamber players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Neon vs Chamber Fragging Analysis
Chamber achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Neon vs Chamber matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Chamber holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 360 competitive matches, Chamber players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.24Neon
1.27Chamber
The KDA comparison between Neon and Chamber reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Neon averaging 1.24 and Chamber posting 1.27. This razor-thin margin of just 0.04 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
16.4Neon
16.6Chamber
Kill production between Neon and Chamber is virtually identical, with Neon averaging 16.4 kills per game and Chamber securing 16.6. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
16.7Neon
15.1Chamber
Chamber demonstrates markedly better survivability against Neon, recording 15.1 deaths per game versus 16.7. Dying nearly 1.7 fewer times per match gives Chamber significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Neon players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
139.6Neon
141.2Chamber
Damage output per round is essentially equal between Neon (139.6 ADR) and Chamber (141.2 ADR). This parity indicates both agents apply similar pressure in firefights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these agents face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing rounds — instead, the deciding factors become headshot consistency, timing of engagements, and coordination with teammates' utility and damage.
HS %
21.3%Neon
29.1%Chamber
The headshot percentage disparity between Chamber and Neon is substantial: 29.1% compared to 21.3%, a 7.9 point difference. Chamber consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Chamber in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Chamber's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Neon vs Chamber Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Neon
49.0%
47.4%
Defense Side
Neon
52.6%
51.0%
Attack Side Breakdown
Neon demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Chamber in this matchup, converting 49.0% of attacking rounds versus 47.4%. While this 1.5 point edge gives Neon slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Chamber players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 360 competitive games suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Chamber teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.5% gap.
When taking entry duels, Neon holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Chamber players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Neon has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 11 agents in Valorant. Neon's strongest matchup is against Deadlock with a 85.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Sage at 28.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Neon matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Neon's best matchup is against Deadlock, achieving a 85.7% win rate. Neon excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Neon's hardest matchup?
Neon's hardest matchup is against Sage, with only a 28.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Neon should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Neon have?
Neon has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 11 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Neon in difficult matchups?
When playing Neon in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Neon's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Neon's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Neon's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Neon's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Chamber should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.5 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Neon shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Chamber, winning 52.6% of defense rounds compared to 51.0%. This 1.5 percentage point edge suggests Neon's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Chamber players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Neon can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.5% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Chamber should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Neon demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Neon converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Chamber should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Neon when you can wait for teammates. Neon can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.5% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Chamber should be more conservative with eco aggression against Neon and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Neon can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Neon holds clear advantages on both attack (49.0%) and defense (52.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Neon vs Chamber matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Neon doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Neon's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Neon performs better. Chamber teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Chamber with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Chamber's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Neon is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Neon provides a measurable ranked advantage. Chamber players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Neon confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Neon wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Chamber isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Neon) vs Sentinel (Chamber) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Neon's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Chamber's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Neon's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Chamber's Sentinel kit counters others. The Neon advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
53.2%
52.6%
52.4%
52.9%
50.2%
51.1%
50.7%
51.5%
51.1%
50.5%
52.5%
52.0%
53.9%
52.9%
52.8%
52.2%
47.0%
50.9%
55.2%
51.4%
55.4%
41.1%
60.7%
53.8%
56.2%
41.7%
Neon vs Chamber head-to-head analysis. Neon holds a 51.4% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 360 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
