Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
25.0%
Matches
4
KDA
1.19
ADR
155

Phoenix vs BrimstoneMatchups

Duelist
Patch12.08
Matches361,808
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedMay 5, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup guide: Brimstone leads with a 75.0% win rate, but Phoenix can still win. Learn how Phoenix's 155 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 4-match dataset into ranked wins.

Phoenix Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Brimstone - 25.0% win rateBrimstone(25.0%)
Phoenix - 25.0% win rate in this matchup
Phoenix
25.0% WR
VS
Brimstone vs Phoenix matchup - 75.0% win rate
Brimstone
75.0% WR

Who Wins the Phoenix vs Brimstone Matchup?

Brimstone wins the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup
Winner
Brimstone
Matches: 4
25.0%
Win Rate
75.0%
1.19
Avg KDA
1.83
17.3
Avg Kills
17.8
20.0
Avg Deaths
16.3
155.3
DMG/Round
149.6
27.9%
HS %
37.5%
238
Combat Score
229
40.4%
Attack WR
48.7%
51.3%
Defense WR
59.6%

Phoenix vs Brimstone Performance Breakdown

Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 4 matches reveals that Brimstone holds a clear advantage over Phoenix in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Phoenix shows strength in one category, Brimstone's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.19Phoenix
1.83Brimstone
Brimstone significantly outperforms Phoenix in fragging efficiency with a 1.83 KDA compared to 1.19. This 0.64 KDA differential indicates that Brimstone players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
155.3Phoenix
149.6Brimstone
Phoenix outputs 155.3 average damage per round, edging out Brimstone's 149.6 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Phoenix secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
40.4%Phoenix
48.7%Brimstone
On the attacking side, Brimstone dominates with a 48.7% win rate compared to Phoenix's 40.4%. This 8.3 percentage point gap indicates Brimstone is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
51.3%Phoenix
59.6%Brimstone
Brimstone excels on the defensive half with a commanding 59.6% win rate, far surpassing Phoenix's 51.3%. This 8.3 percentage point advantage demonstrates Brimstone's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.

Phoenix vs Brimstone Matchup Summary

The Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 4 competitive matches analyzed, Brimstone wins 75.0% of the time compared to Phoenix's 25.0%, a 50.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Brimstone has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Brimstone and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Phoenix vs Brimstone Fragging Analysis

Brimstone wins fragging stats against Phoenix in Valorant

Brimstone claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 4 ranked games reveals Brimstone consistently outperforms Phoenix in direct combat scenarios. While Phoenix manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Brimstone in gunfights. Phoenix players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Brimstone dominates.

Avg KDA
1.19Phoenix
1.83Brimstone
The KDA disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is substantial: 1.83 versus 1.19, a commanding 0.64 point difference that reveals Brimstone's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 4 games shows Brimstone consistently outfragging and outliving Phoenix in these encounters. For Phoenix players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Brimstone whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Brimstone's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
17.3Phoenix
17.8Brimstone
Brimstone secures approximately 0.5 more kills per match than Phoenix in this head-to-head (17.8 vs 17.3). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Brimstone contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Brimstone's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Phoenix can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
20.0Phoenix
16.3Brimstone
The death disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is stark: 16.3 versus 20.0 deaths per game. Phoenix dies 3.8 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Phoenix either takes unfavorable fights against Brimstone or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Phoenix players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Brimstone.
DMG/Round
155.3Phoenix
149.6Brimstone
Phoenix applies 5.7 more damage per round than Brimstone in this matchup (155.3 vs 149.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Phoenix contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Brimstone can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
27.9%Phoenix
37.5%Brimstone
The headshot percentage disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is substantial: 37.5% compared to 27.9%, a 9.6 point difference. Brimstone consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Phoenix, challenging Brimstone in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Brimstone's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Phoenix vs Brimstone Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Brimstone
Phoenix40.4%
Brimstone48.7%
Defense Side
Brimstone
Phoenix51.3%
Brimstone59.6%

Attack Side Breakdown

Brimstone significantly outperforms Phoenix on attack side, achieving a 48.7% round win rate versus 40.4%. This 8.3 point disparity reveals Brimstone as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Phoenix cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.

Based on 4 matches analyzed, Brimstone dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Brimstone significantly. Phoenix teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Phoenix for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Phoenix's direct engagement with Brimstone, and consider how team composition can cover Phoenix's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 8.3% gap.

Phoenix should avoid entry fragging roles against Brimstone whenever possible. The data clearly shows Brimstone wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Phoenix players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Brimstone confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Brimstone can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.

Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Brimstone in this matchup. Phoenix struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Phoenix teams should never leave Phoenix alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Brimstone should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Brimstone substantially outclasses Phoenix on defense, achieving 59.6% round wins compared to 51.3%. This 8.3 percentage point gap indicates Brimstone excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Phoenix cannot match.

Phoenix should never solo anchor against Brimstone. The 8.3% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Phoenix. Instead, pair Phoenix with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Brimstone should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Phoenix's.

Retake dynamics heavily favor Brimstone. When Phoenix needs to retake against Brimstone, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Brimstone should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Phoenix struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Brimstone has a significant statistical edge that Phoenix cannot overcome through individual skill alone.

Economy management becomes critical for Phoenix in this matchup. Force buying against Brimstone is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Phoenix should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Brimstone can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.

Overall Side Analysis

Brimstone demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (48.7%) and defense (59.6%), comprehensively outperforming Phoenix across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 4 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Brimstone holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Phoenix's disadvantage in this matchup. Brimstone outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Phoenix into Brimstone, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Phoenix's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Phoenix in isolated Brimstone encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Phoenix when you expect to face Brimstone frequently. The 16.7 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Brimstone is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Brimstone decisively wins the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Brimstone has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Phoenix players facing Brimstone should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Duelist vs Controller Dynamics

The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Controller (Brimstone) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Brimstone's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Brimstone's Controller kit counters others. The Brimstone advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Phoenix has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Miks at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.08)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
43.94%661.39156.527.7%45.2%51.2%
50.85%591.35148.429.9%48.8%51.9%
44.64%561.28141.227.9%45.3%49.3%
51.16%431.41148.230.1%54.2%49.1%
42.11%381.34144.826.7%45.1%50.9%
53.13%321.34148.024.5%47.9%51.0%
43.75%321.36151.532.6%40.7%55.0%
51.72%291.39151.025.9%50.6%50.7%
34.78%231.43157.927.4%41.8%50.9%
46.67%151.31146.023.6%42.1%57.5%
64.29%141.36152.329.4%51.7%54.3%
53.85%131.39153.328.1%50.4%47.9%
55.56%91.39148.830.2%45.1%50.5%
33.33%90.98116.922.6%42.4%42.5%
44.44%91.31155.529.0%47.6%45.6%
57.14%71.29135.929.6%55.4%50.9%
50.00%61.36142.620.1%50.0%53.1%
83.33%61.72165.126.9%53.1%69.5%
40.00%51.27135.027.6%41.1%56.4%
25.00%41.19155.327.9%40.4%51.3%
75.00%41.52153.429.1%54.3%54.2%
25.00%41.10125.529.8%50.0%44.1%
50.00%41.66177.834.4%63.6%37.5%
50.00%41.34136.628.7%48.8%50.0%
0.00%31.67190.129.1%25.9%45.7%

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Phoenix's best matchup in Valorant?

Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?

Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Miks, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?

Phoenix has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?

When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Duelists