Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
40.0% WR
VS
Brimstone
53.3% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Brimstone Matchup?
Winner
Brimstone
Matches: 15
40.0%
Win Rate
53.3%
1.29
Avg KDA
2.02
17.7
Avg Kills
15.6
18.6
Avg Deaths
15.7
146.1
DMG/Round
133.0
31.7%
HS %
27.9%
220
Combat Score
202
49.4%
Attack WR
52.2%
47.8%
Defense WR
50.6%
Phoenix vs Brimstone Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 15 matches reveals that Brimstone holds a clear advantage over Phoenix in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Phoenix shows strength in one category, Brimstone's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.29Phoenix
2.02Brimstone
Brimstone significantly outperforms Phoenix in fragging efficiency with a 2.02 KDA compared to 1.29. This 0.72 KDA differential indicates that Brimstone players consistently secure more eliminations while dying less frequently, translating to more impactful rounds and better economy management throughout matches.
Damage Output
146.1Phoenix
133.0Brimstone
Phoenix outputs 146.1 average damage per round, edging out Brimstone's 133.0 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Phoenix secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
49.4%Phoenix
52.2%Brimstone
Brimstone shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.2% win rate versus Phoenix's 49.4%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Brimstone provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
47.8%Phoenix
50.6%Brimstone
Defensive capabilities favor Brimstone at 50.6% win rate compared to Phoenix's 47.8%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Brimstone provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 15 competitive matches analyzed, Brimstone wins 53.3% of the time compared to Phoenix's 40.0%, a 13.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Brimstone has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Brimstone and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Phoenix vs Brimstone Fragging Analysis
Phoenix edges out Brimstone in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 15 matches analyzed, this Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup remains contestable for both sides. Brimstone shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Brimstone's favor.
Avg KDA
1.29Phoenix
2.02Brimstone
The KDA disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is substantial: 2.02 versus 1.29, a commanding 0.72 point difference that reveals Brimstone's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 15 games shows Brimstone consistently outfragging and outliving Phoenix in these encounters. For Phoenix players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against Brimstone whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize Brimstone's mechanical advantage. Playing for trades and crossfires becomes essential rather than optional.
Avg Kills
17.7Phoenix
15.6Brimstone
Phoenix substantially outfrags Brimstone in this matchup, averaging 17.7 kills compared to 15.6 — a difference of nearly 2.1 eliminations per match. When Phoenix faces Brimstone, the data clearly shows Phoenix finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Brimstone players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Phoenix in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
18.6Phoenix
15.7Brimstone
The death disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is stark: 15.7 versus 18.6 deaths per game. Phoenix dies 2.9 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Phoenix either takes unfavorable fights against Brimstone or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Phoenix players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Brimstone.
DMG/Round
146.1Phoenix
133.0Brimstone
Phoenix significantly outdamages Brimstone in head-to-head encounters, posting 146.1 ADR versus 133.0. This 13.1 damage-per-round advantage means Phoenix consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Brimstone players should avoid prolonged dueling with Phoenix — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
31.7%Phoenix
27.9%Brimstone
Phoenix demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Brimstone: 31.7% versus 27.9%. This 3.8 percentage point gap in precision means Phoenix ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Brimstone faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Phoenix vs Brimstone Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Brimstone
49.4%
52.2%
Defense Side
Brimstone
47.8%
50.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
Brimstone demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Phoenix in this matchup, converting 52.2% of attacking rounds versus 49.4%. While this 2.8 point edge gives Brimstone slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Phoenix players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 15 competitive games suggests Brimstone's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Phoenix teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.8% gap.
When taking entry duels, Brimstone holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Phoenix players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Brimstone can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 85.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 85.7% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Brimstone's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Phoenix should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.8 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Brimstone shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Phoenix, winning 50.6% of defense rounds compared to 47.8%. This 2.8 percentage point edge suggests Brimstone's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Phoenix players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Brimstone can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.8% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Phoenix should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Brimstone demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Brimstone converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Phoenix should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Brimstone when you can wait for teammates. Brimstone can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.8% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Phoenix should be more conservative with eco aggression against Brimstone and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Brimstone can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Brimstone holds clear advantages on both attack (52.2%) and defense (50.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Brimstone doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Brimstone's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Brimstone performs better. Phoenix teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Phoenix with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Phoenix's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Brimstone is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Brimstone provides a measurable ranked advantage. Phoenix players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Brimstone confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Brimstone wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 5.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Phoenix isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Controller (Brimstone) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Brimstone's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Brimstone's Controller kit counters others. The Brimstone advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup guide: Brimstone leads with a 53.3% win rate, but Phoenix can still win. Learn how Phoenix's 146 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 15-match dataset into ranked wins.
