Phoenix vs Brimstone•Matchup

Phoenix vs Brimstone Matchup Summary

The Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 3 competitive matches analyzed, Brimstone wins 100.0% of the time compared to Phoenix's 0.0%, a 100.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Brimstone consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Brimstone has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Brimstone and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.

Phoenix vs Brimstone Fragging Analysis

Brimstone achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Phoenix in the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Brimstone holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 3 competitive matches, Brimstone players can approach duels against Phoenix with confidence, while Phoenix players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.

Phoenix vs Brimstone Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side

Brimstone

30.0%

64.3%

Defense Side

Brimstone

35.7%

70.0%

Attack Side Breakdown

The attack-side performance gap between Brimstone and Phoenix is dramatic: 64.3% versus 30.0%, a commanding 34.3 percentage point advantage. Brimstone dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Phoenix to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.

Our analysis of 3 competitive matches reveals Brimstone has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Brimstone. This isn't a gap that Phoenix can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Phoenix teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Phoenix from direct Brimstone engagement: give Phoenix lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Phoenix's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.

Under no circumstances should Phoenix take entry duels against Brimstone. The 34.3% attack gap makes entry fragging against Brimstone one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Phoenix must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Brimstone confrontation. Brimstone should actively hunt Phoenix entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.

Phoenix's post-plant conversion rate against Brimstone is catastrophic. The data shows Phoenix fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Brimstone. Never leave Phoenix alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Phoenix is the only survivor. Brimstone should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Phoenix struggles to convert even favorable positions.

Defense Side Breakdown

The defensive disparity between Brimstone and Phoenix is substantial: 70.0% versus 35.7%, a 34.3 point chasm. Brimstone absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.

Phoenix cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Brimstone. The 34.3% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Phoenix: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Brimstone's presence is identified on their site. Brimstone should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.

Phoenix should avoid retake scenarios against Brimstone entirely when possible. The data from 3 matches shows Phoenix's retake conversion rate against Brimstone is dramatically lower than average. If Phoenix must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Brimstone should play post-plant positions knowing Phoenix lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Brimstone wins at overwhelming rates.

Economy decisions for Phoenix must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Brimstone is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Phoenix should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Brimstone can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.

Overall Side Analysis

Brimstone demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (64.3%) and defense (70.0%), comprehensively outperforming Phoenix across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 3 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Brimstone holding advantages at every stage.

Map selection and team composition cannot fix Phoenix's disadvantage in this matchup. Brimstone outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Phoenix into Brimstone, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Phoenix's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Phoenix in isolated Brimstone encounters.

For ranked climbing, avoid playing Phoenix when you expect to face Brimstone frequently. The 68.6 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Brimstone is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.

Final verdict: Brimstone decisively wins the Phoenix vs Brimstone matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Brimstone has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Phoenix players facing Brimstone should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.

Duelist vs Controller Dynamics

The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Controller (Brimstone) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Brimstone's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Brimstone's Controller kit counters others. The Brimstone advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.