Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
48.4% WR
VS
Sova
50.3% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Sova Matchup?
Winner
Sova
Matches: 159
48.4%
Win Rate
50.3%
1.45
Avg KDA
1.39
17.1
Avg Kills
14.2
15.5
Avg Deaths
14.3
157.2
DMG/Round
139.8
31.2%
HS %
29.8%
236
Combat Score
200
46.1%
Attack WR
46.5%
53.5%
Defense WR
53.9%
Phoenix vs Sova Performance Breakdown
The Phoenix vs Sova matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 159 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.45Phoenix
1.39Sova
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Phoenix and Sova, with KDA ratios of 1.45 and 1.39 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
157.2Phoenix
139.8Sova
Phoenix delivers substantially higher damage per round (157.2 ADR) compared to Sova's 139.8 ADR. This 17.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Phoenix a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
46.1%Phoenix
46.5%Sova
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Phoenix at 46.1% and Sova at 46.5% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.5%Phoenix
53.9%Sova
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Phoenix posting a 53.5% win rate and Sova at 53.9%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Phoenix vs Sova matchup in Valorant is a close matchup with a slight statistical edge. Based on 159 competitive matches analyzed, Sova wins 50.3% of the time compared to Phoenix's 48.4%, a 1.9 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Sova holds a minor advantage, but Phoenix can absolutely secure rounds through good positioning and utility timing. The difference is slim enough that coordinated team plays and winning key aim duels can flip the matchup.
Phoenix vs Sova Fragging Analysis
Phoenix claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Phoenix vs Sova matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 159 ranked games reveals Phoenix consistently outperforms Sova in direct combat scenarios. While Sova manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Phoenix in gunfights. Sova players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Phoenix dominates.
Avg KDA
1.45Phoenix
1.39Sova
The KDA comparison between Phoenix and Sova reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Phoenix averaging 1.45 and Sova posting 1.39. This razor-thin margin of just 0.06 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.1Phoenix
14.2Sova
Phoenix substantially outfrags Sova in this matchup, averaging 17.1 kills compared to 14.2 — a difference of nearly 2.8 eliminations per match. When Phoenix faces Sova, the data clearly shows Phoenix finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Sova players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Phoenix in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.5Phoenix
14.3Sova
Sova demonstrates markedly better survivability against Phoenix, recording 14.3 deaths per game versus 15.5. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Sova significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Phoenix players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
157.2Phoenix
139.8Sova
Phoenix significantly outdamages Sova in head-to-head encounters, posting 157.2 ADR versus 139.8. This 17.5 damage-per-round advantage means Phoenix consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Sova players should avoid prolonged dueling with Phoenix — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
31.2%Phoenix
29.8%Sova
Phoenix lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.2% vs 29.8%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.4 percentage point edge translates to Phoenix more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Sova can fully react. Sova players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Phoenix's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Phoenix vs Sova Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Sova
46.1%
46.5%
Defense Side
Sova
53.5%
53.9%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side comparison between Phoenix and Sova reveals near-perfect parity, with Phoenix winning 46.1% of attacking rounds compared to Sova's 46.5%. This negligible 0.3 percentage point difference indicates neither agent possesses inherent advantages when executing onto sites or pushing through chokepoints. When these agents meet on attack, success depends almost entirely on team coordination, execute timing, and individual mechanical skill rather than agent kit superiority.
From a tactical standpoint, neither Phoenix nor Sova should adjust their standard attacking approach based on this matchup. Both agents can run their typical execute patterns, default rotations, and lurk timings without worrying about a statistical disadvantage. The data from 159 matches suggests that whichever player has better game sense, utility timing, and raw mechanical aim will win attack-side encounters — there's no agent-based shortcut to victory here.
For entry fragging specifically, both Phoenix and Sova players can confidently take the first duel when executing onto sites. Neither agent's abilities create meaningful first-contact advantages over the other, so entry success comes down to crosshair placement, pre-aim quality, and jiggle-peeking technique. Whether you're playing Phoenix or Sova, approach site entries with the same confidence you'd have in any other matchup.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant scenarios in this matchup are similarly balanced. Neither agent demonstrates superior spike defense or retake denial capabilities against the other based on our attack-side data. When the spike is down, focus on standard post-plant fundamentals: positioning for crossfires, using utility to delay defuses, and communicating enemy positions to teammates. The 0.3% difference is small enough to be statistical noise rather than a meaningful advantage.
Defense Side Breakdown
Defensive performance between Phoenix and Sova is virtually identical, with Phoenix holding 53.5% of rounds on CT side and Sova at 53.9%. This 0.3 point margin indicates both agents contribute equally when anchoring sites, retaking, or denying post-plants. Neither possesses defensive utility advantages significant enough to swing matchup outcomes.
Both Phoenix and Sova can anchor sites with equal effectiveness in this matchup. Whether holding A, B, or mid on any map, neither agent's defensive kit provides meaningful advantages over the other. Site anchor decisions should be based on map knowledge, team composition needs, and personal preference rather than matchup considerations. The 0.3% difference is too small to influence site assignment choices.
Retake scenarios are similarly balanced between Phoenix and Sova. Neither agent demonstrates superior retake utility, post-plant clearing ability, or clutch potential against the other based on our defensive data from 159 matches. When retaking against either agent, focus on standard retake fundamentals: utility to clear common spots, coordinated timing with teammates, and trading effectively. Don't adjust your retake approach based on whether you're facing Phoenix or Sova.
Economy decisions and utility usage shouldn't change based on this specific matchup during defense. Both agents have comparable force buy success rates, full buy conversion, and utility effectiveness against each other. Make economy calls based on team needs and general defensive principles rather than Phoenix vs Sova specific considerations. Your standard defensive utility timing and placement will be equally effective regardless of which agent you're facing.
Overall Side Analysis
Sova maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 46.5% attack win rate and 53.9% defense win rate. While Sova is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Phoenix remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Phoenix vs Sova specific factors. The slight Sova advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Phoenix and Sova are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Sova has a slight statistical edge, but Phoenix is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Phoenix, don't switch to Sova just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Initiator (Sova) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Sova's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Sova's Initiator kit counters others. The Sova advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Phoenix vs Sova is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.4% vs 50.3%). Based on 159 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
