Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
52.2% WR
VS
Cypher
44.8% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Cypher Matchup?
Winner
Phoenix
Matches: 67
52.2%
Win Rate
44.8%
1.48
Avg KDA
1.36
17.9
Avg Kills
16.2
15.8
Avg Deaths
15.1
158.9
DMG/Round
143.2
31.0%
HS %
30.8%
239
Combat Score
214
48.6%
Attack WR
47.2%
52.8%
Defense WR
51.4%
Phoenix vs Cypher Performance Breakdown
In the Phoenix vs Cypher matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 67 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Cypher in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Cypher in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.48Phoenix
1.36Cypher
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Phoenix and Cypher, with KDA ratios of 1.48 and 1.36 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
158.9Phoenix
143.2Cypher
Phoenix delivers substantially higher damage per round (158.9 ADR) compared to Cypher's 143.2 ADR. This 15.7 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Phoenix a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
48.6%Phoenix
47.2%Cypher
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Phoenix at 48.6% and Cypher at 47.2% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.8%Phoenix
51.4%Cypher
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Phoenix posting a 52.8% win rate and Cypher at 51.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Phoenix vs Cypher matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 67 competitive matches analyzed, Phoenix wins 52.2% of the time compared to Cypher's 44.8%, a 7.5 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Phoenix dominates this matchup statistically. Phoenix can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Cypher should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Phoenix vs Cypher Fragging Analysis
Phoenix claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Phoenix vs Cypher matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. Our analysis of 67 ranked games reveals Phoenix consistently outperforms Cypher in direct combat scenarios. While Cypher manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Phoenix in gunfights. Cypher players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Phoenix dominates.
Avg KDA
1.48Phoenix
1.36Cypher
Phoenix holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.48 compared to Cypher's 1.36. While this 0.12 point difference indicates Phoenix tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Cypher players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Phoenix's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Cypher players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
17.9Phoenix
16.2Cypher
Phoenix substantially outfrags Cypher in this matchup, averaging 17.9 kills compared to 16.2 — a difference of nearly 1.7 eliminations per match. When Phoenix faces Cypher, the data clearly shows Phoenix finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Cypher players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Phoenix in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
15.8Phoenix
15.1Cypher
Cypher survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.1 times per game compared to Phoenix's 15.8 deaths. This 0.6 death difference per match means Cypher is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Phoenix players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Cypher's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
158.9Phoenix
143.2Cypher
Phoenix significantly outdamages Cypher in head-to-head encounters, posting 158.9 ADR versus 143.2. This 15.7 damage-per-round advantage means Phoenix consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Cypher players should avoid prolonged dueling with Phoenix — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
31.0%Phoenix
30.8%Cypher
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Phoenix (31.0%) and Cypher (30.8%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Phoenix vs Cypher Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Phoenix
48.6%
47.2%
Defense Side
Phoenix
52.8%
51.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Cypher in this matchup, converting 48.6% of attacking rounds versus 47.2%. While this 1.4 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Cypher players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 67 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Cypher teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.4% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Cypher players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Cypher should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.4 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Cypher, winning 52.8% of defense rounds compared to 51.4%. This 1.4 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Cypher players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.4% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Cypher should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Cypher should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.4% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Cypher should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Phoenix maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 48.6% attack win rate and 52.8% defense win rate. While Phoenix is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Cypher remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Phoenix vs Cypher specific factors. The slight Phoenix advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Phoenix and Cypher are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Phoenix has a slight statistical edge, but Cypher is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Cypher, don't switch to Phoenix just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Sentinel (Cypher) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Cypher's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Cypher's Sentinel kit counters others. The Phoenix advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Phoenix vs Cypher head-to-head analysis. Phoenix holds a 52.2% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 67 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
