Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
42.3% WR
VS
Fade
56.4% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Fade Matchup?
Winner
Fade
Matches: 78
42.3%
Win Rate
56.4%
1.38
Avg KDA
1.46
15.8
Avg Kills
14.5
15.4
Avg Deaths
14.5
149.1
DMG/Round
138.8
30.0%
HS %
30.4%
225
Combat Score
206
47.6%
Attack WR
49.2%
50.8%
Defense WR
52.4%
Phoenix vs Fade Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 78 matches reveals that Fade holds a clear advantage over Phoenix in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Phoenix shows strength in one category, Fade's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.38Phoenix
1.46Fade
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Phoenix and Fade, with KDA ratios of 1.38 and 1.46 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
149.1Phoenix
138.8Fade
Phoenix outputs 149.1 average damage per round, edging out Fade's 138.8 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Phoenix secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
47.6%Phoenix
49.2%Fade
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Phoenix at 47.6% and Fade at 49.2% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
50.8%Phoenix
52.4%Fade
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Phoenix posting a 50.8% win rate and Fade at 52.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Phoenix vs Fade matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 78 competitive matches analyzed, Fade wins 56.4% of the time compared to Phoenix's 42.3%, a 14.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Initiator matchup, Fade has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Phoenix should never take isolated fights against Fade and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Phoenix vs Fade Fragging Analysis
Fade edges out Phoenix in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 78 matches analyzed, this Phoenix vs Fade matchup remains contestable for both sides. Phoenix shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Phoenix's favor.
Avg KDA
1.38Phoenix
1.46Fade
The KDA comparison between Phoenix and Fade reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Phoenix averaging 1.38 and Fade posting 1.46. This razor-thin margin of just 0.08 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.8Phoenix
14.5Fade
Phoenix secures approximately 1.3 more kills per match than Fade in this head-to-head (15.8 vs 14.5). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Phoenix contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Phoenix's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Fade can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.4Phoenix
14.5Fade
Fade survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.5 times per game compared to Phoenix's 15.4 deaths. This 0.9 death difference per match means Fade is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Phoenix players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Fade's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
149.1Phoenix
138.8Fade
Phoenix significantly outdamages Fade in head-to-head encounters, posting 149.1 ADR versus 138.8. This 10.3 damage-per-round advantage means Phoenix consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Fade players should avoid prolonged dueling with Phoenix — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
30.0%Phoenix
30.4%Fade
Headshot percentages are remarkably similar between Phoenix (30.0%) and Fade (30.4%). This indicates both agents' players display equivalent aim precision when these matchups occur, and neither has a systematic accuracy advantage. Duels come down to reaction time, crosshair pre-placement, and micro-positioning rather than one side consistently hitting more heads. Both agents can confidently challenge long-range angles where headshots become decisive.
Phoenix vs Fade Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Fade
47.6%
49.2%
Defense Side
Fade
50.8%
52.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Fade demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Phoenix in this matchup, converting 49.2% of attacking rounds versus 47.6%. While this 1.5 point edge gives Fade slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Phoenix players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 78 competitive games suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Phoenix teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.5% gap.
When taking entry duels, Fade holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Phoenix players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Fade's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Phoenix should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.5 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Fade shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Phoenix, winning 52.4% of defense rounds compared to 50.8%. This 1.5 percentage point edge suggests Fade's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Phoenix players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Fade can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.5% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Phoenix should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Fade demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Fade converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Phoenix should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Fade when you can wait for teammates. Fade can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.5% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Phoenix should be more conservative with eco aggression against Fade and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Fade can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Fade holds clear advantages on both attack (49.2%) and defense (52.4%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Phoenix vs Fade matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Fade doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Fade's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Fade performs better. Phoenix teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Phoenix with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Phoenix's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Fade is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Fade provides a measurable ranked advantage. Phoenix players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Fade confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Fade wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Phoenix isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Initiator Dynamics
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Initiator (Fade) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Fade's Initiator kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Initiator counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Fade's Initiator kit counters others. The Fade advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
53.4%
51.3%
53.4%
55.2%
54.7%
50.8%
52.9%
55.1%
49.3%
56.1%
50.1%
51.8%
59.1%
46.5%
62.3%
49.0%
48.1%
52.9%
47.8%
53.8%
54.6%
51.8%
53.1%
64.2%
54.3%
Phoenix vs Fade matchup guide: Fade leads with a 56.4% win rate, but Phoenix can still win. Learn how Phoenix's 149 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 78-match dataset into ranked wins.
