Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
46.9% WR
VS
Omen
53.1% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Omen Matchup?
Winner
Omen
Matches: 49
46.9%
Win Rate
53.1%
1.34
Avg KDA
1.74
16.6
Avg Kills
15.7
16.2
Avg Deaths
14.6
150.6
DMG/Round
139.9
31.6%
HS %
30.1%
225
Combat Score
212
48.4%
Attack WR
50.5%
49.5%
Defense WR
51.6%
Phoenix vs Omen Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 49 matches reveals that Omen holds a clear advantage over Phoenix in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Phoenix shows strength in one category, Omen's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.34Phoenix
1.74Omen
Omen maintains a noticeable fragging advantage with a 1.74 KDA versus Phoenix's 1.34. This difference in kill-death-assist ratio suggests Omen players are more reliable in clutch situations and contribute more consistently to round wins through individual playmaking.
Damage Output
150.6Phoenix
139.9Omen
Phoenix outputs 150.6 average damage per round, edging out Omen's 139.9 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Phoenix secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
48.4%Phoenix
50.5%Omen
Omen shows stronger attack-side performance with a 50.5% win rate versus Phoenix's 48.4%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Omen provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
49.5%Phoenix
51.6%Omen
Defensive capabilities favor Omen at 51.6% win rate compared to Phoenix's 49.5%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Omen provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Phoenix vs Omen matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 49 competitive matches analyzed, Omen wins 53.1% of the time compared to Phoenix's 46.9%, a 6.1 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in fragging ability, where Omen consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Controller matchup, Omen dominates this matchup statistically. Omen can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Phoenix should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Phoenix vs Omen Fragging Analysis
Phoenix edges out Omen in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 49 matches analyzed, this Phoenix vs Omen matchup remains contestable for both sides. Omen shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Omen's favor.
Avg KDA
1.34Phoenix
1.74Omen
Omen demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against Phoenix, maintaining a 1.74 KDA versus 1.34. This 0.41 point gap reflects Omen's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. Phoenix players facing Omen should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate utility usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where Omen's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
Avg Kills
16.6Phoenix
15.7Omen
Phoenix secures approximately 0.9 more kills per match than Omen in this head-to-head (16.6 vs 15.7). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Phoenix contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Phoenix's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Omen can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
16.2Phoenix
14.6Omen
Omen demonstrates markedly better survivability against Phoenix, recording 14.6 deaths per game versus 16.2. Dying nearly 1.6 fewer times per match gives Omen significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Phoenix players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
150.6Phoenix
139.9Omen
Phoenix significantly outdamages Omen in head-to-head encounters, posting 150.6 ADR versus 139.9. This 10.6 damage-per-round advantage means Phoenix consistently wins the damage exchange in firefights, either securing kills outright or leaving opponents weak for teammates to clean up. Omen players should avoid prolonged dueling with Phoenix — instead, look for quick picks with burst damage weapons or rely on ability damage and team crossfires to compensate for the raw gunfight disadvantage.
HS %
31.6%Phoenix
30.1%Omen
Phoenix lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (31.6% vs 30.1%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.5 percentage point edge translates to Phoenix more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Omen can fully react. Omen players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Phoenix's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Phoenix vs Omen Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Omen
48.4%
50.5%
Defense Side
Omen
49.5%
51.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
Omen demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Phoenix in this matchup, converting 50.5% of attacking rounds versus 48.4%. While this 2.1 point edge gives Omen slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Phoenix players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 49 competitive games suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Phoenix teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.1% gap.
When taking entry duels, Omen holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Phoenix players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 9 agents and unfavorable matchups against 17 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 9 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 17 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Omen's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Phoenix should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.1 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Omen shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Phoenix, winning 51.6% of defense rounds compared to 49.5%. This 2.1 percentage point edge suggests Omen's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Phoenix players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Omen can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.1% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Phoenix should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Omen demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Omen converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Phoenix should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Omen when you can wait for teammates. Omen can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.1% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Phoenix should be more conservative with eco aggression against Omen and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Omen can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Omen holds clear advantages on both attack (50.5%) and defense (51.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Phoenix vs Omen matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Omen doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Omen's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Omen performs better. Phoenix teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Phoenix with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Phoenix's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Omen is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Omen provides a measurable ranked advantage. Phoenix players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Omen confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Omen wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.1 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Phoenix isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Duelist vs Controller Dynamics
The Duelist (Phoenix) vs Controller (Omen) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Phoenix's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Omen's Controller kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Controller counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Phoenix's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Omen's Controller kit counters others. The Omen advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
53.2%
51.3%
53.5%
55.2%
54.4%
50.8%
52.8%
55.1%
49.5%
56.1%
50.1%
51.8%
59.1%
46.5%
62.3%
49.0%
48.1%
52.9%
47.8%
53.8%
54.6%
51.8%
53.1%
64.2%
54.3%
Phoenix vs Omen is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.9% vs 53.1%). Based on 49 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
