Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Phoenix's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Phoenix
46.3% WR
VS
Neon
51.2% WR
Who Wins the Phoenix vs Neon Matchup?
Winner
Neon
Matches: 80
46.3%
Win Rate
51.2%
1.41
Avg KDA
1.26
16.3
Avg Kills
15.8
15.2
Avg Deaths
16.1
150.4
DMG/Round
146.6
30.8%
HS %
21.1%
227
Combat Score
227
47.4%
Attack WR
46.3%
53.7%
Defense WR
52.6%
Phoenix vs Neon Performance Breakdown
In the Phoenix vs Neon matchup, Phoenix demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 80 analyzed matches, Phoenix outperforms Neon in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Phoenix the statistically favored pick when facing Neon in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.41Phoenix
1.26Neon
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Phoenix and Neon, with KDA ratios of 1.41 and 1.26 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
150.4Phoenix
146.6Neon
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Phoenix averaging 150.4 ADR and Neon at 146.6 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
47.4%Phoenix
46.3%Neon
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Phoenix at 47.4% and Neon at 46.3% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
53.7%Phoenix
52.6%Neon
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Phoenix posting a 53.7% win rate and Neon at 52.6%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Phoenix vs Neon matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 80 competitive matches analyzed, Neon wins 51.2% of the time compared to Phoenix's 46.3%, a 5.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Phoenix consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Duelist matchup, Neon has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Phoenix players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.
Phoenix vs Neon Fragging Analysis
Phoenix achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Neon in the Phoenix vs Neon matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Phoenix holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 80 competitive matches, Phoenix players can approach duels against Neon with confidence, while Neon players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.41Phoenix
1.26Neon
Phoenix holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.41 compared to Neon's 1.26. While this 0.14 point difference indicates Phoenix tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Phoenix's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Neon players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.3Phoenix
15.8Neon
Kill production between Phoenix and Neon is virtually identical, with Phoenix averaging 16.3 kills per game and Neon securing 15.8. This parity suggests both agents are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and round outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, utility usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — entries, clutch situations, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
Avg Deaths
15.2Phoenix
16.1Neon
Phoenix survives longer in this matchup, dying 15.2 times per game compared to Neon's 16.1 deaths. This 0.9 death difference per match means Phoenix is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Neon players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Phoenix's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
150.4Phoenix
146.6Neon
Phoenix applies 3.9 more damage per round than Neon in this matchup (150.4 vs 146.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Phoenix contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Neon can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
30.8%Phoenix
21.1%Neon
The headshot percentage disparity between Phoenix and Neon is substantial: 30.8% compared to 21.1%, a 9.7 point difference. Phoenix consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Neon, challenging Phoenix in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Phoenix's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Phoenix vs Neon Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Phoenix
47.4%
46.3%
Defense Side
Phoenix
53.7%
52.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
Phoenix demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Neon in this matchup, converting 47.4% of attacking rounds versus 46.3%. While this 1.2 point edge gives Phoenix slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Neon players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 80 competitive games suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Neon teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.2% gap.
When taking entry duels, Phoenix holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Neon players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Phoenix has favorable matchups against 10 agents and unfavorable matchups against 16 agents in Valorant. Phoenix's strongest matchup is against Iso with a 81.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Phoenix matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Phoenix's best matchup is against Iso, achieving a 81.0% win rate. Phoenix excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Phoenix's hardest matchup?
Phoenix's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Phoenix should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Phoenix have?
Phoenix has 10 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 16 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Phoenix in difficult matchups?
When playing Phoenix in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Phoenix's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Phoenix's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Phoenix's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Phoenix's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Neon should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.2 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Phoenix shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Neon, winning 53.7% of defense rounds compared to 52.6%. This 1.2 percentage point edge suggests Phoenix's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Neon players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Phoenix can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.2% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Neon should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Phoenix demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Phoenix converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Neon should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Phoenix when you can wait for teammates. Phoenix can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.2% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Neon should be more conservative with eco aggression against Phoenix and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Phoenix can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Phoenix maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 47.4% attack win rate and 53.7% defense win rate. While Phoenix is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Neon remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.
Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Phoenix vs Neon specific factors. The slight Phoenix advantage doesn't change based on external factors.
For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Phoenix and Neon are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.
Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Phoenix has a slight statistical edge, but Neon is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Neon, don't switch to Phoenix just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.
Duelist vs Duelist Dynamics
Both Phoenix and Neon fill the Duelist role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Duelist performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Phoenix is the stronger Duelist pick when these agents face each other.
In Duelist vs Duelist encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Phoenix's statistical advantage suggests their specific Duelist kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
53.4%
51.4%
53.4%
55.3%
53.7%
50.2%
48.8%
52.7%
54.7%
49.0%
56.1%
49.7%
51.1%
59.1%
46.5%
62.3%
49.0%
54.7%
48.1%
47.8%
53.8%
53.5%
60.7%
51.8%
53.1%
54.3%
Phoenix vs Neon is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.3% vs 51.2%). Based on 80 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
