Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Veto's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Veto
46.2% WR
VS
Waylay
53.8% WR
Who Wins the Veto vs Waylay Matchup?
Winner
Waylay
Matches: 52
46.2%
Win Rate
53.8%
1.14
Avg KDA
1.25
14.5
Avg Kills
15.4
14.8
Avg Deaths
15.4
130.9
DMG/Round
138.4
32.6%
HS %
27.7%
194
Combat Score
212
50.3%
Attack WR
52.3%
47.7%
Defense WR
49.7%
Veto vs Waylay Performance Breakdown
In the Veto vs Waylay matchup, Waylay demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 52 analyzed matches, Waylay outperforms Veto in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Waylay the statistically favored pick when facing Veto in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.14Veto
1.25Waylay
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Veto and Waylay, with KDA ratios of 1.14 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
130.9Veto
138.4Waylay
Waylay outputs 138.4 average damage per round, edging out Veto's 130.9 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Waylay secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
50.3%Veto
52.3%Waylay
Waylay shows stronger attack-side performance with a 52.3% win rate versus Veto's 50.3%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Waylay provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
47.7%Veto
49.7%Waylay
Defensive capabilities favor Waylay at 49.7% win rate compared to Veto's 47.7%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Waylay provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Veto vs Waylay matchup in Valorant is a clear advantage for one side. Based on 52 competitive matches analyzed, Waylay wins 53.8% of the time compared to Veto's 46.2%, a 7.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Waylay dominates this matchup statistically. Waylay can confidently take 1v1 duels, while Veto should focus on playing with teammates, using utility to create advantages, and avoiding direct confrontations.
Veto vs Waylay Fragging Analysis
Waylay edges out Veto in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 52 matches analyzed, this Veto vs Waylay matchup remains contestable for both sides. Veto shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Veto's favor.
Avg KDA
1.14Veto
1.25Waylay
Waylay holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.25 compared to Veto's 1.14. While this 0.11 point difference indicates Waylay tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Waylay's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Veto players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.5Veto
15.4Waylay
Waylay secures approximately 0.8 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (15.4 vs 14.5). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Waylay contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Waylay's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.8Veto
15.4Waylay
Veto survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.8 times per game compared to Waylay's 15.4 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means Veto is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Waylay players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Veto's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
130.9Veto
138.4Waylay
Waylay applies 7.5 more damage per round than Veto in this matchup (138.4 vs 130.9 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Waylay contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Veto can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
32.6%Veto
27.7%Waylay
Veto demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Waylay: 32.6% versus 27.7%. This 4.9 percentage point gap in precision means Veto ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Waylay faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Veto vs Waylay Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Waylay
50.3%
52.3%
Defense Side
Waylay
47.7%
49.7%
Attack Side Breakdown
Waylay demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Veto in this matchup, converting 52.3% of attacking rounds versus 50.3%. While this 2.0 point edge gives Waylay slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 52 competitive games suggests Waylay's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Veto teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 2.0% gap.
When taking entry duels, Waylay holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Veto players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Waylay can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Veto has favorable matchups against 13 agents and unfavorable matchups against 9 agents in Valorant. Veto's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 71.4% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Veto matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Veto's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 71.4% win rate. Veto excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Veto's hardest matchup?
Veto's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Veto should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Veto have?
Veto has 13 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 9 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Veto in difficult matchups?
When playing Veto in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Veto's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Veto's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Veto's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Waylay's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Veto should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 2.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Waylay shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Veto, winning 49.7% of defense rounds compared to 47.7%. This 2.0 percentage point edge suggests Waylay's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Veto players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Waylay can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 2.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Veto should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Waylay demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Waylay converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Veto should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Waylay when you can wait for teammates. Waylay can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 2.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Veto should be more conservative with eco aggression against Waylay and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Waylay can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Waylay holds clear advantages on both attack (52.3%) and defense (49.7%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Veto vs Waylay matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Waylay doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Waylay's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Waylay performs better. Veto teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Veto with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Veto's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Waylay is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Waylay provides a measurable ranked advantage. Veto players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Waylay confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Waylay wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 4.0 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Veto isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Veto) vs Duelist (Waylay) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Veto's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Waylay's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Veto's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Waylay's Duelist kit counters others. The Waylay advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
51.5%
47.9%
47.7%
49.8%
52.6%
48.0%
47.9%
53.0%
60.3%
49.7%
56.5%
45.5%
59.2%
45.5%
63.7%
47.3%
48.8%
56.5%
33.8%
55.7%
31.3%
Veto vs Waylay is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (46.2% vs 53.8%). Based on 52 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.
