Veto vs Cypher matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
50.0%
Matches
6
Avg KDA
1.29
Avg ADR
156

Veto vs CypherMatchup

Sentinel
Patch12.01
Matches82,189
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedFeb 3, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Veto vs Cypher head-to-head analysis. Veto holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 6 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.

Veto Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Veto's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Cypher - 50.0% win rateCypher(50.0%)
Veto - 50.0% win rate in this matchup
Veto
50.0% WR
VS
Cypher vs Veto matchup - 50.0% win rate
Cypher
50.0% WR

Who Wins the Veto vs Cypher Matchup?

Veto wins the Veto vs Cypher matchup
Winner
Veto
Matches: 6
50.0%
Win Rate
50.0%
1.29
Avg KDA
1.43
16.5
Avg Kills
17.8
14.5
Avg Deaths
14.3
155.8
DMG/Round
161.3
40.7%
HS %
36.0%
229
Combat Score
248
52.4%
Attack WR
56.4%
43.6%
Defense WR
47.6%

Veto vs Cypher Performance Breakdown

Veto vs Cypher matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

In the Veto vs Cypher matchup, Cypher demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 6 analyzed matches, Cypher outperforms Veto in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Cypher the statistically favored pick when facing Veto in ranked Valorant matches.

Fragging Power
1.29Veto
1.43Cypher
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Veto and Cypher, with KDA ratios of 1.29 and 1.43 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
155.8Veto
161.3Cypher
Cypher outputs 161.3 average damage per round, edging out Veto's 155.8 ADR. This consistent damage advantage helps Cypher secure more assist credits and finish weakened opponents, contributing to overall team success even when not landing the final blow.
Attack Side
52.4%Veto
56.4%Cypher
Cypher shows stronger attack-side performance with a 56.4% win rate versus Veto's 52.4%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Cypher provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
43.6%Veto
47.6%Cypher
Defensive capabilities favor Cypher at 47.6% win rate compared to Veto's 43.6%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Cypher provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.

Veto vs Cypher Matchup Summary

The Veto vs Cypher matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 6 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 50.0% of the time compared to Cypher's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Veto nor Cypher has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.

Veto vs Cypher Fragging Analysis

Cypher wins fragging stats against Veto in Valorant

Cypher claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Veto vs Cypher matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 6 ranked games reveals Cypher consistently outperforms Veto in direct combat scenarios. While Veto manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Cypher in gunfights. Veto players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Cypher dominates.

KDA
1.29Veto
1.43Cypher
Cypher holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.43 compared to Veto's 1.29. While this 0.14 point difference indicates Cypher tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Cypher's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Veto players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
16.5Veto
17.8Cypher
Cypher secures approximately 1.3 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (17.8 vs 16.5). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Cypher contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Cypher's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
14.5Veto
14.3Cypher
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Veto (14.5 deaths/game) and Cypher (14.3 deaths/game). Neither agent demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Round outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any agent-based survival advantage.
DMG/Round
155.8Veto
161.3Cypher
Cypher applies 5.5 more damage per round than Veto in this matchup (161.3 vs 155.8 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Cypher contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Veto can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Headshot %
40.7%Veto
36.0%Cypher
Veto demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Cypher: 40.7% versus 36.0%. This 4.6 percentage point gap in precision means Veto ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Cypher faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).

Veto vs Cypher Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Cypher
Veto52.4%
Cypher56.4%
Defense Side
Cypher
Veto43.6%
Cypher47.6%

Attack Side Breakdown

Cypher holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Veto vs Cypher matchup, winning 56.4% of offensive rounds compared to 52.4% for Veto. This 4.0 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.

Our analysis of 6 matches reveals Cypher's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Cypher consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Veto teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.

Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Cypher's favor in this matchup. When Cypher takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Veto. For Veto players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Cypher's advantages. Cypher can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.

Post-plant is where Cypher's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 4.0% attack-side gap suggests Cypher excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Veto should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Cypher's kit advantages become decisive. For Cypher, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.

Defense Side Breakdown

Cypher demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Veto, holding 47.6% of rounds versus 43.6%. This 4.0 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.

Site anchor assignments should account for Cypher's defensive advantage. Cypher can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Veto should avoid solo anchor positions against Cypher — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Veto's site with Cypher on the execute, expect faster site falls.

Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Cypher in this matchup. Our 6 match analysis shows Cypher converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Veto should never attempt solo retakes against Cypher — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Cypher can confidently take 1vX retakes that Veto should avoid.

Economy rounds highlight Cypher's defensive advantages. Veto should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Cypher, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Cypher can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Veto should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.

Overall Side Analysis

Cypher holds clear advantages on both attack (56.4%) and defense (47.6%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Veto vs Cypher matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Cypher doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.

Cypher's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Cypher performs better. Veto teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Veto with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Veto's positioning.

For ranked climbing specifically, Cypher is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Cypher provides a measurable ranked advantage. Veto players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Cypher confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.

The verdict is clear: Cypher wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 8.0 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Veto isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.

Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics

Both Veto and Cypher fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Cypher is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.

In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Cypher's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.

Veto has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 6 agents in Valorant. Veto's strongest matchup is against Phoenix with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Viper at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Veto matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.01)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
53.57%281.34149.534.8%50.3%52.4%
53.85%261.28148.830.5%49.5%51.3%
48.00%251.23144.930.2%51.5%46.4%
40.00%151.23137.429.6%53.6%47.0%
50.00%141.13133.734.8%54.1%39.3%
57.14%141.20133.335.7%44.8%60.7%
53.85%131.24142.135.0%53.8%45.8%
54.55%111.22142.136.8%55.3%51.4%
37.50%81.15137.930.0%55.4%37.2%
50.00%61.29155.840.7%52.4%43.6%
0.00%60.95125.326.8%46.7%31.0%
60.00%51.27146.034.5%58.3%54.5%
50.00%41.22133.432.5%55.6%53.8%
0.00%41.22159.735.2%48.0%38.3%
50.00%41.24140.034.2%64.9%40.4%
100.00%31.45141.232.8%57.1%63.3%
33.33%31.46192.428.1%40.0%44.8%
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Veto's best matchup in Valorant?

Veto's best matchup is against Phoenix, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Veto excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Veto's hardest matchup?

Veto's hardest matchup is against Viper, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Veto should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Veto have?

Veto has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 6 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Veto in difficult matchups?

When playing Veto in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Veto's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Veto's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Veto's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Sentinels