Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Veto's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Veto
58.6% WR
VS
Yoru
37.9% WR
Who Wins the Veto vs Yoru Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 29
58.6%
Win Rate
37.9%
1.30
Avg KDA
1.25
17.9
Avg Kills
16.9
15.4
Avg Deaths
16.6
145.4
DMG/Round
141.6
32.6%
HS %
31.3%
222
Combat Score
214
50.9%
Attack WR
47.0%
53.0%
Defense WR
49.1%
Veto vs Yoru Performance Breakdown
In the Veto vs Yoru matchup, Veto demonstrates complete superiority across all four key performance categories. Based on 29 analyzed matches, Veto outperforms Yoru in fragging efficiency, damage output, and both attack and defense win rates. This comprehensive advantage makes Veto the statistically favored pick when facing Yoru in ranked Valorant matches.
Fragging Power
1.30Veto
1.25Yoru
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Veto and Yoru, with KDA ratios of 1.30 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
145.4Veto
141.6Yoru
Damage output is evenly distributed in this matchup, with Veto averaging 145.4 ADR and Yoru at 141.6 ADR. Neither agent holds a decisive firepower advantage, making utility usage and team coordination the key differentiators.
Attack Side
50.9%Veto
47.0%Yoru
Veto shows stronger attack-side performance with a 50.9% win rate versus Yoru's 47.0%. When your team needs to plant the spike, Veto provides more reliable site execution and entry potential in this specific matchup.
Defense Side
53.0%Veto
49.1%Yoru
Defensive capabilities favor Veto at 53.0% win rate compared to Yoru's 49.1%. When holding sites against enemy pushes, Veto provides more reliable defensive presence and retake potential in this matchup.
The Veto vs Yoru matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 29 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 58.6% of the time compared to Yoru's 37.9%, a 20.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in attack-side performance, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Yoru should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Veto vs Yoru Fragging Analysis
Veto achieves a clean sweep in the fragging department, winning all five combat metrics against Yoru in the Veto vs Yoru matchup. This comprehensive dominance across KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability demonstrates that Veto holds systematic mechanical advantages in these encounters. Based on analysis of 29 competitive matches, Veto players can approach duels against Yoru with confidence, while Yoru players must completely avoid fair fights and instead focus on utility-based contributions, information gathering, and team coordination to remain impactful.
Avg KDA
1.30Veto
1.25Yoru
The KDA comparison between Veto and Yoru reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Veto averaging 1.30 and Yoru posting 1.25. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
17.9Veto
16.9Yoru
Veto secures approximately 0.9 more kills per match than Yoru in this head-to-head (17.9 vs 16.9). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Veto contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Veto's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Yoru can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.4Veto
16.6Yoru
Veto demonstrates markedly better survivability against Yoru, recording 15.4 deaths per game versus 16.6. Dying nearly 1.2 fewer times per match gives Veto significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Yoru players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
145.4Veto
141.6Yoru
Veto applies 3.8 more damage per round than Yoru in this matchup (145.4 vs 141.6 ADR). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Veto contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Yoru can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
HS %
32.6%Veto
31.3%Yoru
Veto lands headshots at a slightly higher rate (32.6% vs 31.3%), providing a modest but meaningful advantage in time-to-kill during duels. This 1.4 percentage point edge translates to Veto more frequently one-tapping or two-tapping opponents before Yoru can fully react. Yoru players should counter this by avoiding predictable angle holds, using movement to throw off Veto's crosshair placement, and prefiring common positions to negate the accuracy gap.
Veto vs Yoru Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Veto
50.9%
47.0%
Defense Side
Veto
53.0%
49.1%
Attack Side Breakdown
Veto holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Veto vs Yoru matchup, winning 50.9% of offensive rounds compared to 47.0% for Yoru. This 3.9 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 29 matches reveals Veto's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Veto consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Yoru teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Veto's favor in this matchup. When Veto takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Yoru. For Yoru players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Veto's advantages. Veto can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Veto has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 8 agents in Valorant. Veto's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Veto matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Veto's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Veto excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Veto's hardest matchup?
Veto's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Veto should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Veto have?
Veto has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 8 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Veto in difficult matchups?
When playing Veto in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Veto's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Veto's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Veto's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Post-plant is where Veto's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.9% attack-side gap suggests Veto excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Yoru should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Veto's kit advantages become decisive. For Veto, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Veto demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Yoru, holding 53.0% of rounds versus 49.1%. This 3.9 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Veto's defensive advantage. Veto can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Yoru should avoid solo anchor positions against Veto — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Yoru's site with Veto on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Veto in this matchup. Our 29 match analysis shows Veto converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Yoru should never attempt solo retakes against Veto — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Veto can confidently take 1vX retakes that Yoru should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Veto's defensive advantages. Yoru should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Veto, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Veto can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Yoru should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto holds clear advantages on both attack (50.9%) and defense (53.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Veto vs Yoru matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Veto doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Veto's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Veto performs better. Yoru teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Yoru with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Yoru's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Veto is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Veto provides a measurable ranked advantage. Yoru players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Veto confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Veto wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 7.7 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Yoru isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Veto) vs Duelist (Yoru) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Veto's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Yoru's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Veto's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Yoru's Duelist kit counters others. The Veto advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
51.8%
47.9%
47.7%
50.4%
52.6%
48.0%
47.9%
53.0%
60.3%
49.7%
56.5%
45.5%
59.2%
45.5%
63.7%
47.3%
48.8%
60.8%
33.8%
55.7%
31.3%
Veto vs Yoru matchup breakdown: Veto dominates with a 58.6% win rate across 29 matches. Superior fragging (1.30 KDA) gives Veto a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
