Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Veto's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Veto
68.4% WR
VS
Raze
31.6% WR
Who Wins the Veto vs Raze Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 19
68.4%
Win Rate
31.6%
1.25
Avg KDA
1.27
14.6
Avg Kills
15.7
13.8
Avg Deaths
15.9
134.2
DMG/Round
163.7
28.0%
HS %
19.8%
199
Combat Score
243
51.4%
Attack WR
39.7%
60.3%
Defense WR
48.6%
Veto vs Raze Performance Breakdown
The Veto vs Raze matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 19 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.25Veto
1.27Raze
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Veto and Raze, with KDA ratios of 1.25 and 1.27 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
134.2Veto
163.7Raze
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (163.7 ADR) compared to Veto's 134.2 ADR. This 29.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
51.4%Veto
39.7%Raze
On the attacking side, Veto dominates with a 51.4% win rate compared to Raze's 39.7%. This 11.7 percentage point gap indicates Veto is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
60.3%Veto
48.6%Raze
Veto excels on the defensive half with a commanding 60.3% win rate, far surpassing Raze's 48.6%. This 11.7 percentage point advantage demonstrates Veto's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Veto vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 19 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 68.4% of the time compared to Raze's 31.6%, a 36.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Duelist matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Veto vs Raze Fragging Analysis
Raze edges out Veto in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 19 matches analyzed, this Veto vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Veto shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Veto's favor.
Avg KDA
1.25Veto
1.27Raze
The KDA comparison between Veto and Raze reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Veto averaging 1.25 and Raze posting 1.27. This razor-thin margin of just 0.02 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
14.6Veto
15.7Raze
Raze secures approximately 1.1 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (15.7 vs 14.6). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Raze contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Raze's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
13.8Veto
15.9Raze
The death disparity between Veto and Raze is stark: 13.8 versus 15.9 deaths per game. Raze dies 2.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Raze either takes unfavorable fights against Veto or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Raze players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Veto.
DMG/Round
134.2Veto
163.7Raze
The damage differential between Raze and Veto is exceptional: 163.7 ADR compared to just 134.2. Raze deals 29.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Veto struggles to even trade effectively. Veto players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
28.0%Veto
19.8%Raze
The headshot percentage disparity between Veto and Raze is substantial: 28.0% compared to 19.8%, a 8.2 point difference. Veto consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Veto in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Veto's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Veto vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Veto
51.4%
39.7%
Defense Side
Veto
60.3%
48.6%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Veto and Raze is dramatic: 51.4% versus 39.7%, a commanding 11.7 percentage point advantage. Veto dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Raze to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 19 competitive matches reveals Veto has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Veto. This isn't a gap that Raze can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Raze teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Raze from direct Veto engagement: give Raze lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Raze's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Raze take entry duels against Veto. The 11.7% attack gap makes entry fragging against Veto one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Raze must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Veto confrontation. Veto should actively hunt Raze entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Veto has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 8 agents in Valorant. Veto's strongest matchup is against Sage with a 83.3% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 0.0% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Veto matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Veto's best matchup is against Sage, achieving a 83.3% win rate. Veto excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Veto's hardest matchup?
Veto's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 0.0% win rate. Against this opponent, Veto should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Veto have?
Veto has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 8 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Veto in difficult matchups?
When playing Veto in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Veto's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Veto's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Veto's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Raze's post-plant conversion rate against Veto is catastrophic. The data shows Raze fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Veto. Never leave Raze alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Raze is the only survivor. Veto should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Raze struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Veto and Raze is substantial: 60.3% versus 48.6%, a 11.7 point chasm. Veto absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Raze cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Veto. The 11.7% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Raze: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Veto's presence is identified on their site. Veto should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Raze should avoid retake scenarios against Veto entirely when possible. The data from 19 matches shows Raze's retake conversion rate against Veto is dramatically lower than average. If Raze must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Veto should play post-plant positions knowing Raze lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Veto wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Raze must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Veto is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Raze should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Veto can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (51.4%) and defense (60.3%), comprehensively outperforming Raze across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 19 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Veto holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Raze's disadvantage in this matchup. Veto outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Raze into Veto, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Raze's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Raze in isolated Veto encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Raze when you expect to face Veto frequently. The 23.4 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Veto is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Veto decisively wins the Veto vs Raze matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Veto has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Raze players facing Veto should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Sentinel vs Duelist Dynamics
The Sentinel (Veto) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Veto's Sentinel abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Sentinel abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Veto's Sentinel toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Veto advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
51.8%
47.9%
47.7%
50.4%
52.6%
48.0%
47.9%
53.0%
60.3%
49.7%
56.5%
45.5%
59.2%
45.5%
63.7%
47.3%
48.8%
60.8%
33.8%
55.7%
31.3%
Veto vs Raze matchup breakdown: Veto dominates with a 68.4% win rate across 19 matches. Higher damage output (134 ADR) gives Veto a clear edge. See attack/defense stats and combat analysis.
