Mo e Krill
Taxa de Vitoria
35.4%
Partidas
50
KDA
2.61
Dano a jogadores
30,534

Mo e Krill vs Abramsvs Abrams

Nível de habilidadeTodos os níveis de habilidade
Partidas6,377
Versao6487
Última atualização25 de mai. de 2026

Abrams countera fortemente Mo e Krill com apenas 35.4% taxa de vitória em 50 partidas. Abrams obtém 1.4 mais abates em média. Quando enfrenta este counter, priorize itens defensivos, jogabilidade em equipe e evite trocas prolongadas.

Mo e Krill Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Mo e Krill performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Abrams - 35.4% win rateAbrams(35.4%)
Mo e Krill - 35.4% win rate in this matchup
Mo e Krill
35.4% WR
VS
Abrams vs Mo e Krill matchup - 62.5% win rate
Abrams
62.5% WR

Who Wins the Mo e Krill vs Abrams Matchup?

Abrams wins the Mo e Krill vs Abrams matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 50
35.4%
Win Rate
62.5%
4.7
Avg Kills
6.1
7.0
Avg Deaths
7.3
13.5
Avg Assists
12.2
41,108
Avg Net Worth
41,300
30,534
Player DMG
31,971
3,607
Objective DMG
5,556
85.4
Last Hits
84.2

Mo e Krill vs Abrams Resumo do confronto

The Mo e Krill vs Abrams matchup in Deadlock is um confronto decisivamente unilateral. Based on 50 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 62.5% win rate compared to Mo e Krill's 35.4%, giving Abrams a 27.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Abrams consistently outperforms. Abrams has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Mo e Krill should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

Mo e Krill vs Abrams Análise de combate

Abrams wins combat stats against Mo e Krill in Deadlock

Abrams edges out Mo e Krill in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 50 matches analyzed, this Mo e Krill vs Abrams matchup remains contestable for both sides. Mo e Krill shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Mo e Krill's favor.

Proporção KDA
2.61Mo e Krill
2.53Abrams
The KDA comparison between Mo e Krill and Abrams reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Mo e Krill averaging 2.61 and Abrams posting 2.53. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
Abates médios
4.7Mo e Krill
6.1Abrams
Abrams secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than Mo e Krill in this head-to-head (6.1 vs 4.7). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Abrams contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Abrams's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Mo e Krill can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Mortes médias
7.0Mo e Krill
7.3Abrams
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Mo e Krill (7.0 deaths/game) and Abrams (7.3 deaths/game). Neither hero demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any hero-based survival advantage.
Dano a jogadores
30,534Mo e Krill
31,971Abrams
Abrams applies 1,436 more damage per game than Mo e Krill in this matchup (31,971 vs 30,534). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Abrams contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Mo e Krill can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Dano a objetivos
3,607Mo e Krill
5,556Abrams
Abrams contributes 1,950 more objective damage than Mo e Krill on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with Abrams may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. Mo e Krill should focus on creating picks while Abrams pushes objectives.

Mo e Krill vs Abrams Análise econômica

Patrimônio líquido
41,108Mo e Krill
41,300Abrams
Últimos golpes
85.4Mo e Krill
84.2Abrams

Mo e Krill and Abrams have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

Itens recomendados para Mo e Krill vs Abrams

Mo e Krill build for Abrams matchup

Build Mo e Krill vs Abrams

This optimized build for Mo e Krill against Abrams is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 64.6% win rate disadvantage against Abrams, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. Vulnerabilidade Mística, Emblema do Encantador, Explosão Mística, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 16,800 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

Abrams build for Mo e Krill matchup

Build Abrams vs Mo e Krill

Abrams's recommended build against Mo e Krill leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring Abrams, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. Ritmo de Cura, Espiritualidade Perfurante, Botas de Corrida, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 31,200 souls Understanding Abrams's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

Essas builds de itens são otimizadas para o confronto Mo e Krill vs Abrams com base em dados de taxa de vitória de 50 partidas competitivas. As escolhas de itens no Deadlock impactam significativamente os resultados dos confrontos — a build certa pode ajudar a superar desvantagens estatísticas ou ampliar vantagens existentes. Lembre-se de adaptar sua build com base no estado do jogo, composições de equipe, itens inimigos e se você está à frente ou atrás em almas.

Mo e Krill tem matchups favoráveis contra 23 heróis e matchups desfavoráveis contra 14 heróis no Deadlock. O matchup mais forte de Mo e Krill é contra Paradoxa com uma taxa de vitória de 65.2%. O matchup mais difícil é Mala com 33.3% de taxa de vitória. Use a tabela abaixo para encontrar detalhes específicos de matchups e recomendações de build.

Mo e Krill matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
60.00%1062.945.06.731,05040,958
53.61%1022.784.96.929,65340,512
57.32%882.855.06.630,98742,896
56.63%873.035.26.731,03041,707
46.91%862.965.56.730,35740,270
54.43%853.175.46.230,19540,989
53.95%842.905.06.830,89341,769
40.79%832.695.27.130,13739,687
51.95%832.965.46.832,23143,209
50.63%832.824.86.428,75737,886
49.33%802.944.96.530,08140,864
52.63%792.805.36.630,14641,317
48.48%742.504.97.429,30540,456
47.14%742.835.26.629,32941,387
42.65%732.695.17.130,76340,964
61.97%733.475.36.029,71840,208
58.57%722.664.86.628,70437,638
52.38%663.325.86.432,89743,622
56.14%632.915.06.730,15540,222
55.00%613.305.35.729,16339,629
52.08%583.105.35.926,95237,619
48.08%583.074.86.429,69241,655
50.94%573.284.85.927,12439,002
46.30%552.605.07.130,95542,388
56.25%552.854.96.326,34238,966
65.22%523.365.96.330,87042,520
35.42%502.614.77.030,53441,108
56.52%493.525.96.132,44940,963
33.33%492.525.37.430,39840,054
62.79%453.005.96.934,80543,106
43.59%402.895.86.730,82739,431
54.05%392.885.07.232,75143,922
47.37%392.614.86.929,44040,719
50.00%382.253.87.627,38439,328
47.22%372.414.47.127,12338,703
48.65%373.714.35.228,28539,622
51.43%372.924.76.833,44840,246

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Mo e Krill Matchups - FAQ

Qual é o melhor confronto de Mo e Krill no Deadlock?

O melhor confronto de Mo e Krill é contra Paradoxa, alcançando 65.2% de taxa de vitória. Mo e Krill se destaca neste confronto através de stats de combate superiores e interações de habilidade favoráveis.

Qual é o confronto mais difícil de Mo e Krill?

O confronto mais difícil de Mo e Krill é contra Mala, com apenas 33.3% de taxa de vitória. Contra este oponente, Mo e Krill deve focar em coordenação de equipe e itemização defensiva.

Quantos confrontos favoráveis Mo e Krill tem?

Mo e Krill tem 23 confrontos favoráveis (taxa de vitória 50%+) e 14 confrontos desfavoráveis no Deadlock. Entender essas dinâmicas de confronto ajuda você a fazer melhores seleções de herói e adaptar seu estilo de jogo.

Como eu devo jogar Mo e Krill em confrontos difíceis?

Quando jogando Mo e Krill em confrontos difíceis, priorize farm seguro, posicionamento e coordenação de equipe. Ajuste sua build de itens para compensar a desvantagem de confronto e procure por oportunidades de impactar lutas através de habilidades em vez de confrontação direta.

Quais stats devo focar nos confrontos de Mo e Krill?

Stats principais para analisar nos confrontos de Mo e Krill incluem taxa de vitória, proporção de KDA, dano médio do jogador e diferença de patrimônio líquido. Confrontos de dano alto favorecem jogo agressivo, enquanto confrontos de KDA baixa sugerem jogar mais defensivamente e confiar no suporte de equipe.