Abrams
Taxa de Vitoria
62.5%
Partidas
50
KDA
2.53
Dano a jogadores
31,971

Abrams vs Mo e Krillvs Mo e Krill

Nível de habilidadeTodos os níveis de habilidade
Partidas6,211
Versao6487
Última atualização25 de mai. de 2026

Abrams domina Mo e Krill com uma impressionante 62.5% taxa de vitória em Deadlock. Em 50 jogos, Abrams em média obtém 6.1 abates e 1,436 mais dano de jogador por partida. Este confronto favorável permite jogabilidade agressiva e oportunidades de luta antecipadas.

Abrams Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Abrams performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent
Mo e Krill - 62.5% win rateMo e Krill(62.5%)
Abrams - 62.5% win rate in this matchup
Abrams
62.5% WR
VS
Mo e Krill vs Abrams matchup - 35.4% win rate
Mo e Krill
35.4% WR

Who Wins the Abrams vs Mo e Krill Matchup?

Abrams wins the Abrams vs Mo e Krill matchup
Winner
Abrams
Matches: 50
62.5%
Win Rate
35.4%
6.1
Avg Kills
4.7
7.3
Avg Deaths
7.0
12.2
Avg Assists
13.5
41,300
Avg Net Worth
41,108
31,971
Player DMG
30,534
5,556
Objective DMG
3,607
84.2
Last Hits
85.4

Abrams vs Mo e Krill Resumo do confronto

The Abrams vs Mo e Krill matchup in Deadlock is um confronto decisivamente unilateral. Based on 50 recent matches analyzed, Abrams wins with a 62.5% win rate compared to Mo e Krill's 35.4%, giving Abrams a 27.1 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where Abrams consistently outperforms. Abrams has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. Mo e Krill should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

Abrams vs Mo e Krill Análise de combate

Abrams wins combat stats against Mo e Krill in Deadlock

Abrams edges out Mo e Krill in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 50 matches analyzed, this Abrams vs Mo e Krill matchup remains contestable for both sides. Mo e Krill shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Mo e Krill's favor.

Proporção KDA
2.53Abrams
2.61Mo e Krill
The KDA comparison between Abrams and Mo e Krill reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Abrams averaging 2.53 and Mo e Krill posting 2.61. This razor-thin margin demonstrates that neither hero has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, ability timing, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent hero kit advantage.
Abates médios
6.1Abrams
4.7Mo e Krill
Abrams secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than Mo e Krill in this head-to-head (6.1 vs 4.7). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to Abrams contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Abrams's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Mo e Krill can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
Mortes médias
7.3Abrams
7.0Mo e Krill
Survivability metrics are nearly equal between Abrams (7.3 deaths/game) and Mo e Krill (7.0 deaths/game). Neither hero demonstrates a clear advantage in staying alive during these matchups, suggesting both have similar risk profiles and neither kit provides notably better escape tools or defensive utility against the other. Outcomes in this matchup hinge on which player makes fewer critical positioning errors rather than any hero-based survival advantage.
Dano a jogadores
31,971Abrams
30,534Mo e Krill
Abrams applies 1,436 more damage per game than Mo e Krill in this matchup (31,971 vs 30,534). While not overwhelming, this gap compounds meaningfully over a full match: Abrams contributes noticeably more chip damage, assists, and near-kills that set up teammates. Mo e Krill can close this gap through better trading patterns, ensuring their damage leads to actual eliminations rather than just tagging opponents who then escape or get healed.
Dano a objetivos
5,556Abrams
3,607Mo e Krill
Abrams contributes 1,950 more objective damage than Mo e Krill on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with Abrams may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. Mo e Krill should focus on creating picks while Abrams pushes objectives.

Abrams vs Mo e Krill Análise econômica

Patrimônio líquido
41,300Abrams
41,108Mo e Krill
Últimos golpes
84.2Abrams
85.4Mo e Krill

Abrams and Mo e Krill have nearly identical economic performance in this matchup, generating comparable souls throughout the game. Item timing advantages will come from efficient farming and securing kills rather than inherent hero advantages. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

Itens recomendados para Abrams vs Mo e Krill

Abrams build for Mo e Krill matchup

Build Abrams vs Mo e Krill

This winning build for Abrams against Mo e Krill focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 62.5% win rate against Mo e Krill, these 7 items help Abrams press the advantage and close out games efficiently. Ritmo de Cura, Espiritualidade Perfurante, Botas de Corrida, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 31,200 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

Mo e Krill build for Abrams matchup

Build Mo e Krill vs Abrams

Mo e Krill's counter-build against Abrams attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, Mo e Krill players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. Vulnerabilidade Mística, Emblema do Encantador, Explosão Mística, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 16,800 souls Knowing Mo e Krill's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

Essas builds de itens são otimizadas para o confronto Abrams vs Mo e Krill com base em dados de taxa de vitória de 50 partidas competitivas. As escolhas de itens no Deadlock impactam significativamente os resultados dos confrontos — a build certa pode ajudar a superar desvantagens estatísticas ou ampliar vantagens existentes. Lembre-se de adaptar sua build com base no estado do jogo, composições de equipe, itens inimigos e se você está à frente ou atrás em almas.

Abrams tem matchups favoráveis contra 20 heróis e matchups desfavoráveis contra 17 heróis no Deadlock. O matchup mais forte de Abrams é contra Miragem com uma taxa de vitória de 66.7%. O matchup mais difícil é Porteiro com 35.1% de taxa de vitória. Use a tabela abaixo para encontrar detalhes específicos de matchups e recomendações de build.

Abrams matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
Kills
Deaths
Player DMG
Net Worth
45.36%1042.186.18.029,70339,873
54.17%1012.616.37.531,16939,713
56.25%1012.606.27.230,43640,458
45.68%942.656.07.229,40738,500
52.22%932.576.67.632,58341,023
49.40%902.375.67.928,66038,087
59.52%892.606.27.331,38440,234
51.81%882.295.07.326,69137,166
53.09%862.896.26.531,21340,145
45.00%842.466.27.830,08340,769
53.85%832.576.27.429,78239,492
42.86%822.376.87.931,51839,796
57.97%762.806.77.132,38840,499
58.33%762.596.37.329,89440,020
58.82%752.616.77.129,74139,166
50.00%752.415.97.428,15339,394
37.68%722.265.47.226,29336,481
61.29%702.806.57.330,32742,011
61.54%682.595.37.029,51439,633
43.94%682.376.67.931,61538,862
49.15%662.616.47.531,12242,609
56.67%632.696.57.030,83140,423
35.09%612.326.77.932,58541,944
55.36%612.315.87.429,02239,352
48.15%572.646.27.029,85039,175
36.54%572.466.27.228,80237,232
46.30%562.556.47.330,36240,277
46.94%522.296.07.529,99739,524
48.98%512.334.96.827,24338,717
54.17%502.496.87.733,01241,449
62.50%502.536.17.331,97141,300
52.17%492.416.87.930,75039,672
43.90%442.205.87.530,06538,044
66.67%423.166.66.131,75141,060
41.67%382.174.98.129,65941,603
57.14%383.124.95.726,87539,306
40.63%342.165.17.627,06438,579

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Ajude-nos a manter a precisão! Se você notar estatísticas incorretas, dados faltantes ou quaisquer problemas, seu feedback melhora diretamente a qualidade dos nossos dados para toda a comunidade.

Reportar problema

Abrams Matchups - FAQ

Qual é o melhor confronto de Abrams no Deadlock?

O melhor confronto de Abrams é contra Miragem, alcançando 66.7% de taxa de vitória. Abrams se destaca neste confronto através de stats de combate superiores e interações de habilidade favoráveis.

Qual é o confronto mais difícil de Abrams?

O confronto mais difícil de Abrams é contra Porteiro, com apenas 35.1% de taxa de vitória. Contra este oponente, Abrams deve focar em coordenação de equipe e itemização defensiva.

Quantos confrontos favoráveis Abrams tem?

Abrams tem 20 confrontos favoráveis (taxa de vitória 50%+) e 17 confrontos desfavoráveis no Deadlock. Entender essas dinâmicas de confronto ajuda você a fazer melhores seleções de herói e adaptar seu estilo de jogo.

Como eu devo jogar Abrams em confrontos difíceis?

Quando jogando Abrams em confrontos difíceis, priorize farm seguro, posicionamento e coordenação de equipe. Ajuste sua build de itens para compensar a desvantagem de confronto e procure por oportunidades de impactar lutas através de habilidades em vez de confrontação direta.

Quais stats devo focar nos confrontos de Abrams?

Stats principais para analisar nos confrontos de Abrams incluem taxa de vitória, proporção de KDA, dano médio do jogador e diferença de patrimônio líquido. Confrontos de dano alto favorecem jogo agressivo, enquanto confrontos de KDA baixa sugerem jogar mais defensivamente e confiar no suporte de equipe.