雷姆 vs 悖论 - 59.6% 胜率 | Deadlock 对位

雷姆 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 雷姆 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent

悖论(59.6%)

雷姆

59.6% WR

悖论

40.7% WR

Who Wins the 雷姆 vs 悖论 Matchup?

Winner

雷姆

Matches: 61

59.6%

Win Rate

40.7%

3.5

Avg Kills

4.7

5.1

Avg Deaths

6.8

16.0

Avg Assists

11.9

42,044

Avg Net Worth

39,591

22,455

Player DMG

31,990

5,019

Objective DMG

4,321

83.0

Last Hits

97.6

雷姆 vs 悖论对战摘要

The 雷姆 vs 悖论 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 61 recent matches analyzed, 雷姆 wins with a 59.6% win rate compared to 悖论's 40.7%, giving 雷姆 a 19.0 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 雷姆 consistently outperforms. 雷姆 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

雷姆 vs 悖论战斗分析

雷姆 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 61 matches analyzed, this 雷姆 vs 悖论 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率

3.79雷姆

2.44悖论

The KDA disparity between 雷姆 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.79 versus 2.44, a commanding 1.35 point difference that reveals 雷姆's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 61 games shows 雷姆 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 雷姆 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 雷姆's mechanical advantage.

平均击杀

3.5雷姆

4.7悖论

悖论 secures approximately 1.2 more kills per match than 雷姆 in this head-to-head (4.7 vs 3.5). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to 悖论 contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates 悖论's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though 雷姆 can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.

平均死亡

5.1雷姆

6.8悖论

雷姆 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 雷姆 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.

玩家伤害

22,455雷姆

31,990悖论

The damage differential between 悖论 and 雷姆 is exceptional: 31,990 compared to just 22,455. 悖论 deals 9,535 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 雷姆 struggles to even trade effectively. 雷姆 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.

目标伤害

5,019雷姆

4,321悖论

Objective damage contribution is similar between 雷姆 (5,019) and 悖论 (4,321). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

雷姆 vs 悖论经济分析

净资产

42,044雷姆

39,591悖论

补刀

83.0雷姆

97.6悖论

雷姆 vastly out-earns 悖论 by 2,453 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means 雷姆 will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. 悖论 secures more last hits (97.6 vs 83.0), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.9 vs 2.1). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

雷姆 vs 悖论推荐装备

雷姆对战悖论装备

This winning build for 雷姆 against 悖论 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 59.6% win rate against 悖论, these 7 items help 雷姆 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 伤上加伤, 灵能涌动, 冷却压缩, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,000 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

悖论对战雷姆装备

悖论's counter-build against 雷姆 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 悖论 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 弹道附魔, 秘术缓速, 灵力灌注, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 21,600 souls Knowing 悖论's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于61场竞技比赛的胜率数据，针对雷姆对战悖论进行优化的。在Deadlock中，装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

See this matchup from 悖论's perspective

雷姆在Deadlock中对15名英雄有利，对22名英雄不利。雷姆最强对位是蜃景，胜率66.0%。最难对位是卡厉可，胜率29.4%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

雷姆 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent	Win Rate	Matches	KDA	Kills	Deaths	Player DMG	Net Worth
米娜	45.00%	128	3.08	3.5	5.6	22,857	40,145
柒	43.36%	125	3.52	3.6	5.3	23,072	41,213
岚梦	48.70%	119	3.20	3.7	5.7	21,787	39,218
维克多	46.30%	115	3.03	3.4	5.7	20,660	38,597
诛邪者	51.43%	114	3.11	3.7	6.1	25,353	42,843
西尔芙	58.00%	112	3.92	3.6	4.7	23,154	40,889
奇能	42.57%	111	2.68	3.9	6.5	25,847	41,600
比波普	53.54%	110	3.27	3.7	5.6	21,960	40,513
希弗	51.58%	103	3.72	3.7	5.3	23,198	43,335
格瑞墓	48.31%	103	3.63	3.9	5.1	23,325	41,392
大和	49.46%	99	3.41	3.4	5.3	23,226	40,864
劳什	52.27%	97	2.89	3.3	5.9	22,213	40,158
赛凌	48.86%	96	3.00	3.6	5.9	23,540	41,007
炽焱	53.85%	95	3.50	3.4	5.3	23,103	41,862
孤猎	42.17%	90	3.14	4.0	6.1	24,912	40,791
阿波罗	59.21%	84	3.53	4.3	5.6	27,000	44,397
盖斯特夫人	47.95%	84	3.19	3.6	5.9	24,942	40,999
口袋	46.67%	81	3.21	3.5	5.8	21,886	42,100
沃督	47.50%	81	3.32	3.3	5.5	22,212	41,902
亚伯兰	41.67%	76	2.63	3.6	6.3	22,279	39,431
门侍	48.61%	75	3.49	3.4	5.4	23,895	41,013
佩吉	59.70%	74	3.17	3.5	5.4	23,713	42,371
比利	59.70%	73	3.47	4.3	5.6	23,225	42,410
青藤	44.44%	69	3.22	3.8	5.7	24,590	42,894
灰爪	55.36%	66	3.52	3.9	5.6	22,553	41,024
莫克双雄	45.45%	63	3.35	3.4	5.6	21,474	39,734
灵魅	47.37%	62	3.34	4.0	5.9	25,809	43,388
悖论	59.65%	61	3.79	3.5	5.1	22,455	42,044
薇妲	48.15%	58	3.09	2.9	5.3	18,531	36,450
麦金妮	50.00%	57	3.19	3.4	5.7	23,540	39,704
魔液	48.00%	55	3.37	3.0	5.2	20,954	40,119
蜃景	65.96%	53	4.30	4.2	4.8	28,237	44,296
开尔文	42.86%	48	2.97	3.6	5.6	24,821	39,282
哈雷黛	65.91%	47	3.19	3.6	6.0	22,787	41,888
无双魔术师	48.89%	45	3.25	4.2	6.0	25,153	40,769
蝰邪	63.64%	40	3.69	3.4	5.4	20,159	40,047
卡厉可	29.41%	38	2.69	2.9	5.9	22,991	38,882