悖论 vs 雷姆 - 40.7% 胜率 | Deadlock 对位

悖论 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 悖论 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent

雷姆(40.7%)

悖论

40.7% WR

雷姆

59.6% WR

Who Wins the 悖论 vs 雷姆 Matchup?

Winner

雷姆

Matches: 61

40.7%

Win Rate

59.6%

4.7

Avg Kills

3.5

6.8

Avg Deaths

5.1

11.9

Avg Assists

16.0

39,591

Avg Net Worth

42,044

31,990

Player DMG

22,455

4,321

Objective DMG

5,019

97.6

Last Hits

83.0

悖论 vs 雷姆对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 61 recent matches analyzed, 雷姆 wins with a 59.6% win rate compared to 悖论's 40.7%, giving 雷姆 a 19.0 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 雷姆 consistently outperforms. 雷姆 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 悖论 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

悖论 vs 雷姆战斗分析

雷姆 edges out 悖论 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 61 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 悖论 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 悖论's favor.

KDA比率

2.44悖论

3.79雷姆

The KDA disparity between 雷姆 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.79 versus 2.44, a commanding 1.35 point difference that reveals 雷姆's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 61 games shows 雷姆 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 雷姆 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 雷姆's mechanical advantage.

平均击杀

4.7悖论

3.5雷姆

悖论 secures approximately 1.2 more kills per match than 雷姆 in this head-to-head (4.7 vs 3.5). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to 悖论 contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates 悖论's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though 雷姆 can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.

平均死亡

6.8悖论

5.1雷姆

雷姆 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 雷姆 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.

玩家伤害

31,990悖论

22,455雷姆

The damage differential between 悖论 and 雷姆 is exceptional: 31,990 compared to just 22,455. 悖论 deals 9,535 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 雷姆 struggles to even trade effectively. 雷姆 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.

目标伤害

4,321悖论

5,019雷姆

Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,321) and 雷姆 (5,019). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 雷姆经济分析

净资产

39,591悖论

42,044雷姆

补刀

97.6悖论

83.0雷姆

雷姆 vastly out-earns 悖论 by 2,453 souls on average. This substantial economic gap means 雷姆 will consistently hit item breakpoints earlier, creating a snowballing advantage throughout the game. 悖论 secures more last hits (97.6 vs 83.0), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.9 vs 2.1). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 雷姆推荐装备

悖论对战雷姆装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 雷姆 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 59.3% win rate disadvantage against 雷姆, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 弹道附魔, 秘术缓速, 灵力灌注, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 21,600 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

雷姆对战悖论装备

雷姆's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 雷姆, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 伤上加伤, 灵能涌动, 冷却压缩, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 32,000 souls Understanding 雷姆's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于61场竞技比赛的胜率数据，针对悖论对战雷姆进行优化的。在Deadlock中，装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

See this matchup from 雷姆's perspective

悖论在Deadlock中对17名英雄有利，对20名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是哈雷黛，胜率74.1%。最难对位是青藤，胜率31.5%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6487)
Opponent	Win Rate	Matches	KDA	Kills	Deaths	Player DMG	Net Worth
米娜	55.67%	105	2.64	4.8	6.4	30,659	38,294
比波普	58.43%	96	2.62	5.0	6.7	32,701	40,461
西尔芙	55.42%	90	2.74	5.1	6.3	32,181	39,729
维克多	47.50%	89	2.50	4.6	6.7	29,970	40,655
柒	37.66%	89	2.65	5.0	6.1	31,250	39,106
岚梦	46.91%	87	2.61	5.1	6.8	33,077	40,899
希弗	53.85%	82	2.75	5.6	6.4	35,335	41,617
诛邪者	60.26%	82	2.91	4.7	6.7	32,240	42,209
比利	48.00%	78	2.56	4.9	6.6	29,549	38,762
炽焱	50.00%	75	2.47	5.1	7.4	34,259	42,296
沃督	37.50%	74	2.22	4.4	6.8	29,540	37,521
格瑞墓	46.88%	72	2.93	4.8	5.8	29,702	39,666
劳什	46.27%	72	2.29	4.6	6.7	29,990	38,559
奇能	53.13%	68	2.66	4.9	6.6	32,425	42,352
孤猎	56.67%	66	2.78	5.5	7.2	31,951	42,725
灵魅	47.69%	66	2.63	5.4	6.9	33,742	42,086
阿波罗	49.12%	65	2.45	5.1	7.0	32,872	41,457
赛凌	56.67%	64	2.88	4.8	6.0	28,656	39,846
大和	34.48%	61	2.67	5.4	6.4	33,703	40,608
雷姆	40.68%	61	2.44	4.7	6.8	31,990	39,591
薇妲	47.27%	58	2.20	4.6	6.7	27,375	36,469
口袋	53.70%	57	2.91	5.6	6.2	32,572	41,467
青藤	31.48%	57	2.44	4.9	6.9	33,626	39,359
亚伯兰	60.38%	57	2.76	5.3	6.5	30,964	39,845
门侍	44.44%	56	2.37	4.7	6.7	32,573	39,504
莫克双雄	33.33%	52	2.59	5.2	6.6	32,469	41,306
灰爪	52.94%	52	2.75	6.4	7.4	37,274	43,903
盖斯特夫人	54.35%	50	2.78	4.8	6.5	31,384	42,179
佩吉	65.91%	46	3.33	5.9	5.8	32,739	42,778
蝰邪	37.21%	45	2.40	4.5	6.5	30,411	38,813
开尔文	44.74%	41	2.62	5.2	6.7	34,965	42,628
麦金妮	45.00%	41	2.40	5.7	7.1	37,053	45,816
蜃景	50.00%	39	2.96	4.7	5.9	32,597	41,376
魔液	51.43%	36	2.08	3.7	7.4	28,765	38,516
无双魔术师	33.33%	34	2.45	5.2	7.2	34,890	42,903
卡厉可	36.67%	33	2.67	5.0	6.5	31,055	37,673
哈雷黛	74.07%	29	2.84	5.7	6.4	31,631	40,366