悖论 vs 雷姆 - 49.2% 胜率 | Deadlock 对位

悖论 Matchup Breakdown

Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 悖论 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, combat stats, net worth comparison, and damage analysis — all based on real ranked Deadlock data.

Compare against an opponent

雷姆(49.2%)

悖论

49.2% WR

雷姆

50.9% WR

Who Wins the 悖论 vs 雷姆 Matchup?

Winner

雷姆

Matches: 5,139

49.2%

Win Rate

50.9%

5.1

Avg Kills

3.9

6.6

Avg Deaths

5.6

12.7

Avg Assists

14.4

42,542

Avg Net Worth

43,614

34,597

Player DMG

24,905

5,288

Objective DMG

5,097

101.9

Last Hits

89.2

悖论 vs 雷姆对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup in Deadlock is 相对均衡的对战，略有优势. Based on 5,139 recent matches analyzed, 雷姆 wins with a 50.9% win rate compared to 悖论's 49.2%, giving 雷姆 a 1.7 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. 雷姆 has a small statistical advantage, but 悖论 can absolutely win through smart play. The margin is thin enough that jungle rotations, team coordination, and mechanical outplays will often determine the outcome more than champion select.

悖论 vs 雷姆战斗分析

悖论 edges out 雷姆 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 5,139 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 雷姆 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 雷姆's favor.

KDA比率

2.69悖论

3.25雷姆

雷姆 demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against 悖论, maintaining a 3.25 KDA versus 2.69. This 0.56 point gap reflects 雷姆's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. 悖论 players facing 雷姆 should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where 雷姆's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.

平均击杀

5.1悖论

3.9雷姆

悖论 secures approximately 1.2 more kills per match than 雷姆 in this head-to-head (5.1 vs 3.9). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to 悖论 contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates 悖论's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though 雷姆 can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.

平均死亡

6.6悖论

5.6雷姆

雷姆 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 雷姆 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.

玩家伤害

34,597悖论

24,905雷姆

The damage differential between 悖论 and 雷姆 is exceptional: 34,597 compared to just 24,905. 悖论 deals 9,691 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 雷姆 struggles to even trade effectively. 雷姆 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.

目标伤害

5,288悖论

5,097雷姆

Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (5,288) and 雷姆 (5,097). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 雷姆经济分析

净资产

42,542悖论

43,614雷姆

补刀

101.9悖论

89.2雷姆

雷姆 generates approximately 1,072 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 雷姆 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (101.9 vs 89.2), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.7 vs 2.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 雷姆推荐装备

悖论对战雷姆装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 雷姆 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 50.8% win rate disadvantage against 雷姆, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 大伤元气, 治疗律动, 巨人, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 24,800 souls The build emphasizes early power spikes with cost-efficient items, allowing you to stay relevant even when 雷姆 has an inherent advantage.

雷姆对战悖论装备

雷姆's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 雷姆, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 狂乱, 幻影突袭, 穿幕行者, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 38,400 souls Understanding 雷姆's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于5,139场竞技比赛的胜率数据，针对悖论对战雷姆进行优化的。在Deadlock中，装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

See this matchup from 雷姆's perspective

悖论在Deadlock中对7名英雄有利，对30名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是灰爪，胜率53.7%。最难对位是岚梦，胜率40.9%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6430)
Opponent	Win Rate	Matches	KDA	Kills	Deaths	Player DMG	Net Worth
格瑞墓	42.62%	5,328	2.67	5.2	6.7	34,783	42,842
雷姆	49.16%	5,139	2.69	5.1	6.6	34,597	42,542
岚梦	40.94%	5,060	2.63	5.3	6.8	35,557	42,422
炽焱	44.61%	4,305	2.60	5.2	6.8	35,074	42,625
诛邪者	47.88%	4,199	2.69	5.1	6.6	34,659	42,146
米娜	49.44%	4,052	2.58	5.1	6.9	34,371	42,972
奇能	42.81%	3,830	2.59	5.3	6.9	37,380	42,591
柒	42.09%	3,671	2.61	5.4	6.9	35,244	42,723
劳什	46.07%	3,666	2.46	5.1	7.2	34,618	42,522
孤猎	45.38%	3,486	2.61	5.1	6.9	34,657	42,369
门侍	48.20%	3,388	2.64	5.3	6.9	36,413	43,663
佩吉	46.43%	3,384	2.65	5.1	6.6	33,916	42,850
比波普	52.41%	3,211	2.76	5.7	7.0	36,711	42,979
灵魅	47.01%	3,199	2.68	5.1	6.6	34,957	42,172
阿波罗	46.48%	3,198	2.60	5.1	6.9	34,893	42,349
西尔芙	47.77%	2,951	2.59	5.0	6.8	34,431	42,100
盖斯特夫人	46.09%	2,919	2.66	5.2	6.8	36,028	42,832
赛凌	47.70%	2,849	2.65	5.2	6.8	35,152	43,138
蜃景	47.88%	2,821	2.63	5.0	6.7	35,533	43,021
青藤	43.78%	2,803	2.69	5.1	6.6	36,116	41,980
希弗	50.97%	2,677	2.78	5.2	6.6	35,379	43,340
亚伯兰	46.07%	2,637	2.66	5.2	6.8	35,876	42,292
莫克双雄	47.69%	2,605	2.76	5.4	6.8	36,823	42,749
薇妲	49.10%	2,583	2.55	5.0	6.9	33,071	42,053
比利	47.84%	2,521	2.71	5.1	6.8	34,780	42,384
大和	48.43%	2,342	2.64	5.2	6.9	35,176	42,260
开尔文	42.31%	2,290	2.59	5.0	6.7	36,357	41,506
沃督	45.23%	2,038	2.60	5.0	6.7	34,315	42,149
口袋	50.08%	1,977	2.71	5.5	7.0	36,537	43,840
魔液	51.33%	1,955	2.73	5.3	6.6	35,669	43,132
卡厉可	47.00%	1,897	2.51	5.1	7.1	34,537	42,198
维克多	46.41%	1,881	2.65	5.1	6.7	35,520	43,079
麦金妮	46.45%	1,852	2.66	5.1	6.6	35,162	43,304
蝰邪	49.18%	1,535	2.71	5.3	6.7	34,643	42,621
哈雷黛	52.34%	1,404	2.64	5.2	6.8	34,524	42,397
灰爪	53.73%	1,388	2.69	5.3	6.6	34,201	42,727
无双魔术师	52.27%	1,241	2.85	5.3	6.5	35,668	43,358