悖论
胜率
50.3%
场次
1,204
KDA
2.68
玩家伤害
34,376

悖论 vs 雷姆vs 雷姆

技能等级所有技能等级
场次4,970
版本6628
最后更新2026年7月10日

悖论 vs 雷姆 的对位在 1,204 场比赛中非常接近,胜率为 50.3% vs 49.4%。悖论 在死亡比率上略占优势。个人技术和位置将比英雄选择更多地决定这个均衡对位的结果。

Metabot 徽标
MetaBot 桌面版
实时游戏内覆盖层
加入我们的 Discord
反馈Bug、功能建议与开发者交流
加入 Discord

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 50.3% win rate in this matchup
悖论
50.3% 胜率
VS
雷姆 vs 悖论 matchup - 49.4% win rate
雷姆
49.4% 胜率

悖论 vs 雷姆对线谁赢?

悖论 wins the 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup
获胜者
悖论
比赛: 1,204
50.3%
胜率
49.4%
5.4
场均击杀
3.8
7.1
场均死亡
5.5
13.7
场均助攻
16.7
41,963
场均净资产
42,798
34,376
玩家伤害
23,020
6,038
目标伤害
4,877
100.1
补刀
85.1

悖论 vs 雷姆 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup in Deadlock is 一场极其接近的对战,个人技能是决定性因素. Based on 1,204 recent matches analyzed, 悖论 wins with a 50.3% win rate compared to 雷姆's 49.4%, giving 悖论 a 0.9 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. Both 悖论 and 雷姆 have roughly equal chances of winning. Focus on outplaying your opponent through superior positioning, ability usage, and map awareness rather than relying on any inherent hero advantage.

悖论 vs 雷姆 战斗分析

悖论 wins combat stats against 雷姆 in Deadlock

悖论 edges out 雷姆 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,204 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 雷姆 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 雷姆's favor.

KDA比率
2.68悖论
3.71雷姆
The KDA disparity between 雷姆 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.71 versus 2.68, a commanding 1.04 point difference that reveals 雷姆's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 1,204 games shows 雷姆 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 雷姆 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 雷姆's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.4悖论
3.8雷姆
悖论 substantially outfrags 雷姆 in this matchup, averaging 5.4 kills compared to 3.8 — a difference of nearly 1.6 eliminations per match. When 悖论 faces 雷姆, the data clearly shows 悖论 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 雷姆 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 悖论 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
7.1悖论
5.5雷姆
雷姆 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 雷姆 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
34,376悖论
23,020雷姆
The damage differential between 悖论 and 雷姆 is exceptional: 34,376 compared to just 23,020. 悖论 deals 11,356 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 雷姆 struggles to even trade effectively. 雷姆 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
6,038悖论
4,877雷姆
悖论 contributes 1,161 more objective damage than 雷姆 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 悖论 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 雷姆 should focus on creating picks while 悖论 pushes objectives.

悖论 vs 雷姆 经济分析

净资产
41,963悖论
42,798雷姆
补刀
100.1悖论
85.1雷姆

雷姆 generates approximately 835 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 雷姆 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (100.1 vs 85.1), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.7 vs 2.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 雷姆 推荐装备

悖论 build for 雷姆 matchup

悖论对战雷姆装备

This winning build for 悖论 against 雷姆 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 50.3% win rate against 雷姆, these 7 items help 悖论 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 身躯虚化, 巫师护甲, 魔力装填, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 37,199 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

雷姆 build for 悖论 matchup

雷姆对战悖论装备

雷姆's counter-build against 悖论 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 雷姆 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 魔毯, 穿幕行者, 秘术愈疗, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 31,599 souls Knowing 雷姆's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于1,204场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战雷姆进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

悖论在Deadlock中对9名英雄有利,对28名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是西尔芙,胜率53.1%。最难对位是佩吉,胜率42.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6628)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
47.47%1,5982.665.37.134,05542,312
50.68%1,5882.675.67.334,73341,975
45.51%1,5282.665.77.335,24742,332
50.04%1,5092.695.47.033,50741,800
46.61%1,4732.585.57.334,88742,477
43.97%1,4362.645.87.335,35342,303
46.51%1,4312.565.37.333,66141,813
42.53%1,2742.675.67.134,69342,661
48.74%1,2362.795.87.034,63942,145
50.31%1,2042.685.47.134,37641,963
46.16%1,1932.755.57.034,38242,221
46.76%1,1822.685.26.933,33740,916
49.68%1,1622.685.67.334,44543,110
42.13%1,0472.535.47.233,22142,469
47.87%1,0422.645.67.333,50640,841
43.86%1,0162.685.77.134,50641,479
46.13%9882.605.47.233,30142,031
47.53%9852.605.57.333,85041,552
46.25%9722.585.47.435,24243,170
48.31%9652.735.57.033,24742,271
47.69%9552.615.67.335,02442,514
45.59%9252.665.57.135,41942,025
47.34%8832.685.57.135,14643,009
43.05%8802.585.27.032,16341,938
51.37%8292.775.87.035,23243,481
50.14%7792.885.77.035,28743,177
42.90%7372.665.57.234,96941,554
45.55%7342.585.37.133,72041,467
47.25%7322.695.57.135,96343,183
49.62%7112.795.77.235,13843,461
50.15%7112.795.97.335,09843,160
53.12%6932.795.87.133,65942,680
52.68%6192.825.66.934,84743,096
44.42%5412.765.46.835,04743,683
42.53%5092.685.46.935,89142,326
46.62%5012.655.37.032,18841,218
52.81%4462.965.66.734,21243,369

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗西尔芙,达到53.1%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗佩吉,仅有42.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有9个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和28个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。