悖论
胜率
46.8%
场次
4,097
KDA
2.67

悖论 vs 雷姆 vs 雷姆

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
12,499
版本
6774
最后更新
2026年10月14日 UTC

悖论 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 雷姆 面临 46.8% 胜率的挑战。来自 4,097 场游戏的数据显示 悖论 平均有 1.4 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

悖论对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看悖论对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
悖论 - 此对线中46.8%胜率
悖论
46.8% 胜率
VS
雷姆 vs 悖论对线 - 53.2%胜率
雷姆
53.2% 胜率

悖论 vs 雷姆对线谁赢?

雷姆赢得悖论 vs 雷姆对线
获胜者
雷姆
比赛: 4,097
46.8%
胜率
53.2%
5.0
场均击杀
3.4
6.3
场均死亡
4.9
11.8
场均助攻
15.2
39,049
场均净资产
40,036
32,931
玩家伤害
19,646
4,842
目标伤害
4,227
88.7
补刀
72.8

悖论 vs 雷姆 对战摘要

The 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup in Deadlock is 显著的统计优势. Based on 4,097 recent matches analyzed, 雷姆 wins with a 53.2% win rate compared to 悖论's 46.8%, giving 雷姆 a 6.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in damage output, where 悖论 consistently outperforms. 雷姆 dominates this matchup statistically. 雷姆 can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while 悖论 should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

悖论 vs 雷姆 战斗分析

悖论 wins combat stats against 雷姆 in Deadlock

悖论 edges out 雷姆 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 4,097 matches analyzed, this 悖论 vs 雷姆 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 雷姆 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 雷姆's favor.

KDA比率
2.67悖论
3.76雷姆
The KDA disparity between 雷姆 and 悖论 is substantial: 3.76 versus 2.67, a commanding 1.09 point difference that reveals 雷姆's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 4,097 games shows 雷姆 consistently outfragging and outliving 悖论 in these encounters. For 悖论 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 雷姆 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 雷姆's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.0悖论
3.4雷姆
悖论 substantially outfrags 雷姆 in this matchup, averaging 5.0 kills compared to 3.4 — a difference of nearly 1.6 eliminations per match. When 悖论 faces 雷姆, the data clearly shows 悖论 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 雷姆 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 悖论 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
6.3悖论
4.9雷姆
雷姆 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 悖论, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 雷姆 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 悖论 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
32,931悖论
19,646雷姆
The damage differential between 悖论 and 雷姆 is exceptional: 32,931 compared to just 19,646. 悖论 deals 13,286 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 悖论's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 雷姆 struggles to even trade effectively. 雷姆 players should treat 悖论 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
4,842悖论
4,227雷姆
Objective damage contribution is similar between 悖论 (4,842) and 雷姆 (4,227). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

悖论 vs 雷姆 经济分析

净资产
39,049悖论
40,036雷姆
补刀
88.7悖论
72.8雷姆

雷姆 generates approximately 987 more souls than 悖论 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 雷姆 a mid-game advantage. 悖论 secures more last hits (88.7 vs 72.8), while 悖论 leads in denies (3.1 vs 2.3). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

悖论 vs 雷姆 推荐装备

悖论 build for 雷姆 matchup

悖论对战雷姆装备

This optimized build for 悖论 against 雷姆 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 53.2% win rate disadvantage against 雷姆, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 神圣屏障, 头弹破防, 元灵燃烧, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,000 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

雷姆 build for 悖论 matchup

雷姆对战悖论装备

雷姆's recommended build against 悖论 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 雷姆, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 魔毯, 幸免于难, 巫师护甲, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 48,399 souls Understanding 雷姆's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于4,097场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对悖论对战雷姆进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕悖论组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

悖论在Deadlock中对3名英雄有利,对37名英雄不利。悖论最强对位是蜃景,胜率51.4%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率38.1%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

悖论 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6774)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
38.17%9,5392.654.96.231,80438,955
47.06%8,3112.745.26.332,95639,399
40.25%5,7562.615.46.633,64839,129
47.55%4,6122.705.26.433,24139,440
38.32%4,5962.524.96.431,06639,102
48.32%4,5342.695.46.734,84439,489
48.62%4,4512.685.56.634,09840,106
38.07%4,4002.595.06.431,58139,255
45.75%4,2542.605.36.633,62839,754
46.79%4,0972.675.06.332,93139,049
44.23%3,9322.605.36.633,42139,671
43.76%3,8392.525.36.933,36238,865
45.15%3,6012.565.46.632,92439,137
39.40%3,4262.645.26.432,62839,436
43.52%3,3412.675.16.432,94938,840
46.26%3,2732.735.26.332,59939,471
45.35%2,9152.635.46.733,24939,451
42.20%2,9122.575.36.633,50039,041
48.05%2,8952.615.36.732,84039,306
47.55%2,8582.645.26.534,11139,530
49.46%2,6672.675.46.733,47339,934
47.53%2,6072.605.46.733,50639,241
41.30%2,4992.495.16.733,78239,265
45.96%2,4852.625.46.735,22039,623
50.97%2,4212.775.56.434,27140,366
42.34%2,3902.585.26.534,59539,184
41.29%2,3032.605.16.433,40438,470
49.54%2,2872.715.46.534,65640,769
45.60%2,1692.635.36.634,43539,919
50.05%2,1502.795.66.634,62840,658
46.96%1,9252.595.56.933,81039,424
49.75%1,7772.655.36.533,99439,700
49.94%1,6622.895.56.234,00940,777
41.95%1,6282.615.26.434,51538,710
44.88%1,4932.735.26.231,65039,078
49.86%1,4722.795.46.234,40639,944
51.36%1,2852.735.26.334,10840,820
42.62%1,1312.725.26.132,56139,905
46.84%9652.675.36.533,73139,785
45.10%8472.893.64.523,65035,682
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

悖论对位 - 常见问题

悖论在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

悖论最好的对阵是对抗蜃景,达到51.4%的胜率。悖论通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

悖论在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

悖论最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有38.1%的胜率。对抗此对手时,悖论应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

悖论有多少有利的对阵?

悖论在Deadlock中有3个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和37个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩悖论?

在悖论的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在悖论的对阵中关注什么属性?

在悖论对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。