破败之王对阵 远古恐惧
破败之王 vs 远古恐惧在LoL版本26.11中是a decisive对线。远古恐惧以56.7%胜率(+13.3%)击败破败之王，基于60场比赛。破败之王 wins the early laning phase while 远古恐惧 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到破败之王 vs 远古恐惧对线的最佳破败之王出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
破败之王对线分析
使用下拉菜单选择对手，查看破败之王对阵他们的详细分析。您将获得正面对决胜率、对线数据、该对线的最佳出装和符文，以及前期vs后期分析——所有数据均基于真实排位数据。
破败之王 vs 远古恐惧对线谁赢？
破败之王对战远古恐惧对决摘要
破败之王对战远古恐惧在英雄联盟排位赛中是决定性的对决。根据60场近期比赛的分析，远古恐惧以56.7%的胜率获胜，相比破败之王的43.3%，给予远古恐惧 13.3个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：破败之王控制早期对线阶段，但远古恐惧在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——破败之王需要在远古恐惧达到强势期之前压制优势，而远古恐惧应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，远古恐惧领先0.7s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 远古恐惧在这场对决中有强大优势。破败之王玩家应该防守性地游戏，优先在塔下安全发育，并寻找由打野压力或远古恐惧过度前压创造的机会。避免长时间换血，等待团战，那里的位置和协调更重要。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
破败之王对战远古恐惧对线阶段分析
破败之王在对线阶段对阵远古恐惧时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的4个。破败之王在补刀, 伤害, 金币收入 和 续航方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 破败之王 Build Against 远古恐惧
水银之靴是对抗远古恐惧的最佳鞋子选择，提供破败之王在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 破败之王对抗远古恐惧表现最好的核心装备是收集者, 海妖杀手 和 凡性的提醒。这一组合给破败之王提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装表现出色，在5场比赛中达到80.0%胜率——远高于平均水平，使其成为对抗远古恐惧的最佳装备路径。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为破败之王对战远古恐惧对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
破败之王51.9%
远古恐惧48.1%破败之王36.4%远古恐惧63.6%在早期对线阶段（前15分钟），破败之王有显著的51.9%胜率，超过远古恐惧 3.7个百分点。破败之王玩家应该通过激进换血、兵线优先权和早期与打野的协调来压制这一优势。
远古恐惧在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有63.6%胜率——比破败之王高27.3点。长时间游戏强烈有利于远古恐惧，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
这场对决有戏剧性的力量转变：破败之王必须积极压制早期优势并在远古恐惧达到成长节点之前结束游戏。如果远古恐惧在不太落后的情况下度过对线阶段，对决将倾向于他们。龙和峡谷先锋控制至关重要——确保早期目标的队伍可以滚雪球或争取时间成长。
Best 破败之王 Runes Against 远古恐惧
精密
启迪
精密和启迪符文设置给破败之王在这场困难对决中与远古恐惧竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.11版本破败之王对线数据。下表显示破败之王对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括破败之王最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46.96% | 428 | 1.0 | 702 | 13,267 | 50.8% | 43.9% | |
| 49.01% | 404 | 1.0 | 717 | 13,405 | 46.2% | 51.4% | |
| 45.08% | 315 | 0.9 | 704 | 12,924 | 40.8% | 48.8% | |
| 53.53% | 312 | 1.0 | 762 | 13,858 | 50.4% | 55.6% | |
| 54.03% | 298 | 1.1 | 770 | 13,545 | 53.9% | 54.2% | |
| 53.65% | 274 | 1.0 | 724 | 13,918 | 52.1% | 54.8% | |
| 54.34% | 265 | 1.0 | 645 | 13,420 | 47.1% | 60.6% | |
| 54.79% | 261 | 1.0 | 710 | 13,188 | 58.3% | 52.0% | |
| 46.48% | 256 | 1.0 | 743 | 13,957 | 40.4% | 50.7% | |
| 45.21% | 188 | 1.0 | 691 | 13,579 | 42.9% | 46.6% | |
| 52.17% | 184 | 0.9 | 723 | 13,989 | 46.3% | 56.7% | |
| 45.71% | 175 | 1.1 | 769 | 12,765 | 48.3% | 43.0% | |
| 51.25% | 160 | 1.1 | 736 | 13,481 | 50.0% | 52.0% | |
| 56.77% | 155 | 0.9 | 728 | 13,499 | 57.3% | 56.3% | |
| 47.97% | 148 | 0.9 | 638 | 12,827 | 50.0% | 46.3% | |
| 44.90% | 147 | 1.0 | 691 | 13,217 | 45.7% | 44.2% | |
| 58.87% | 141 | 1.0 | 739 | 13,661 | 56.7% | 60.5% | |
| 52.90% | 138 | 1.0 | 696 | 13,404 | 51.7% | 53.8% | |
| 48.84% | 129 | 0.9 | 735 | 12,731 | 40.3% | 56.7% | |
| 44.26% | 122 | 1.1 | 694 | 13,407 | 47.4% | 41.5% | |
| 43.40% | 106 | 1.0 | 685 | 12,836 | 43.2% | 43.5% | |
| 46.67% | 105 | 0.9 | 719 | 13,905 | 51.4% | 44.1% | |
| 48.04% | 102 | 1.0 | 672 | 12,676 | 44.9% | 50.9% | |
| 47.52% | 101 | 1.1 | 751 | 13,344 | 53.5% | 43.1% | |
| 50.50% | 101 | 0.9 | 676 | 13,116 | 47.7% | 52.6% | |
| 49.50% | 101 | 1.1 | 732 | 13,845 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 100 | 1.1 | 738 | 13,026 | 51.0% | 49.0% | |
| 42.22% | 90 | 0.9 | 644 | 12,301 | 39.1% | 45.5% | |
| 52.87% | 87 | 0.8 | 614 | 12,792 | 51.2% | 54.4% | |
| 48.24% | 85 | 0.9 | 706 | 12,774 | 51.2% | 45.2% | |
| 45.88% | 85 | 1.1 | 639 | 12,921 | 39.0% | 52.3% | |
| 42.25% | 71 | 1.1 | 855 | 13,541 | 36.7% | 46.3% | |
| 47.69% | 65 | 0.9 | 671 | 12,982 | 42.1% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 64 | 1.1 | 685 | 13,013 | 42.4% | 58.1% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.1 | 690 | 13,268 | 51.9% | 36.4% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 1.1 | 676 | 12,784 | 69.2% | 44.4% | |
| 52.00% | 50 | 1.4 | 740 | 13,515 | 43.5% | 59.3% | |
| 47.92% | 48 | 1.4 | 729 | 13,372 | 61.1% | 40.0% | |
| 43.48% | 46 | 0.8 | 595 | 12,358 | 36.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 46 | 1.5 | 742 | 13,550 | 45.5% | 54.2% | |
| 52.17% | 46 | 1.1 | 617 | 12,493 | 35.0% | 65.4% | |
| 34.88% | 43 | 1.4 | 624 | 13,153 | 37.5% | 33.3% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 1.0 | 741 | 13,773 | 52.9% | 44.0% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 1.5 | 894 | 13,418 | 38.9% | 54.2% | |
| 47.62% | 42 | 1.1 | 717 | 13,481 | 50.0% | 46.7% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 0.9 | 609 | 13,036 | 47.6% | 58.8% | |
| 52.63% | 38 | 1.1 | 696 | 14,063 | 62.5% | 45.5% | |
| 58.82% | 34 | 1.3 | 786 | 13,856 | 72.7% | 52.2% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 1.2 | 610 | 13,461 | 40.0% | 34.8% | |
| 45.45% | 33 | 0.8 | 631 | 11,062 | 44.4% | 46.7% | |
| 37.50% | 32 | 1.6 | 618 | 12,486 | 50.0% | 27.8% | |
| 58.62% | 29 | 0.9 | 653 | 14,116 | 66.7% | 55.0% | |
| 70.37% | 27 | 1.6 | 722 | 14,530 | 70.0% | 70.6% | |
| 48.15% | 27 | 1.3 | 631 | 12,256 | 53.9% | 42.9% | |
| 46.15% | 26 | 1.2 | 706 | 10,899 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 1.1 | 737 | 13,951 | 36.4% | 61.5% | |
| 41.67% | 24 | 0.9 | 758 | 14,131 | 54.5% | 30.8% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 1.3 | 922 | 14,253 | 63.6% | 61.5% | |
| 78.26% | 23 | 1.3 | 739 | 13,001 | 87.5% | 57.1% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.2 | 829 | 16,236 | 60.0% | 50.0% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.6 | 753 | 12,028 | 50.0% | 30.8% | |
| 26.32% | 19 | 2.0 | 730 | 13,362 | 37.5% | 18.2% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 0.9 | 595 | 13,043 | 71.4% | 54.5% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 0.8 | 841 | 15,031 | 25.0% | 62.5% | |
| 20.00% | 15 | 2.1 | 701 | 16,067 | 50.0% | 15.4% | |
| 92.31% | 13 | 1.1 | 746 | 12,083 | 85.7% | 100.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 3.5 | 713 | 11,301 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 12 | 1.5 | 719 | 14,666 | 80.0% | 28.6% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 803 | 13,506 | 66.7% | 22.2% | |
| 63.64% | 11 | 5.4 | 857 | 12,821 | 83.3% | 40.0% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 0.9 | 722 | 13,378 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 0.8 | 479 | 11,444 | 20.0% | 66.7% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 1.2 | 898 | 13,326 | 71.4% | 66.7% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 2.6 | 875 | 15,938 | 66.7% | 83.3% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 3.7 | 778 | 13,077 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 1.1 | 864 | 15,166 | 75.0% | 25.0% | |
| 100.00% | 7 | 1.1 | 761 | 12,670 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.8 | 1,327 | 17,413 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.0 | 868 | 12,812 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.4 | 1,335 | 15,041 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 4.2 | 813 | 17,441 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 100.00% | 6 | 5.3 | 984 | 12,737 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.2 | 931 | 15,313 | 0.0% | 60.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.3 | 597 | 9,576 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.7 | 707 | 11,791 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.0 | 843 | 13,787 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.9 | 931 | 15,127 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 0.9 | 671 | 12,062 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.1 | 578 | 11,677 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
破败之王 vs 远古恐惧 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，破败之王对远古恐惧表现如何？
远古恐惧以56.7%的胜率赢得破败之王 vs 远古恐惧的对决，而破败之王为43.3%，相差13.3个百分点。该数据基于26.11版本的60场近期排位赛。
在前期，破败之王对远古恐惧表现如何？
在前期，破败之王对远古恐惧占有优势，胜率为51.9%对48.1%。破败之王玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，破败之王对远古恐惧表现如何？
在后期，远古恐惧以63.6%对36.4%的胜率主导破败之王 vs 远古恐惧的对决。远古恐惧在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得破败之王 vs 远古恐惧的对决？
远古恐惧在英雄联盟26.11版本中以56.7%的胜率赢得对破败之王的对决。13.3个百分点的优势意味着根据60场分析的比赛，远古恐惧在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗远古恐惧的最佳破败之王出装是什么？
对抗远古恐惧的最佳破败之王出装包括收集者, 海妖杀手, 凡性的提醒 with 水银之靴。This build achieves a 80.0% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗远古恐惧的最佳破败之王符文是什么？
对抗远古恐惧的最佳破败之王符文使用精密主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 47.6% win rate in the 破败之王 vs 远古恐惧 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
破败之王克制远古恐惧吗？
不，破败之王对抗远古恐惧时表现吃力，胜率仅为43.3%。远古恐惧在这个对决中占优。破败之王玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少远古恐惧的领先优势。
如何用破败之王对战远古恐惧？
当破败之王对战远古恐惧时，谨慎游戏并避开远古恐惧的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 远古恐惧 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。