破败之王对阵 无极剑圣
破败之王 vs 无极剑圣在LoL版本26.7中是a decisive对线。无极剑圣以52.8%胜率(+5.7%)击败破败之王，基于212场比赛。破败之王 wins the early laning phase while 无极剑圣 scales better into the late game.下方您将找到破败之王 vs 无极剑圣对线的最佳破败之王出装、符文、对线统计和策略。
破败之王 Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how 破败之王 performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
无极剑圣(47.2%)Who Wins the 破败之王 vs 无极剑圣 Matchup?
破败之王对战无极剑圣对决摘要
破败之王对战无极剑圣在英雄联盟排位赛中是中等程度的对决。根据212场近期比赛的分析，无极剑圣以52.8%的胜率获胜，相比破败之王的47.2%，给予无极剑圣 5.7个百分点的优势。 游戏阶段动态在此起着关键作用：破败之王控制早期对线阶段，但无极剑圣在游戏进行时成长更好。对决会根据游戏时长发生戏剧性变化——破败之王需要在无极剑圣达到强势期之前压制优势，而无极剑圣应专注于安全发育和达到关键装备节点。 最显著的统计差距在控制技能方面，破败之王领先0.3s CC/min——这一差异严重影响换血和小规模团战的结果。 虽然无极剑圣略占优势，但破败之王绝对可以通过聪明的换血模式和波浪管理赢得这条线。专注于围绕你的冷却时间进行游戏，只在必要时放弃补刀，并利用无极剑圣的失误。 理解这些对决动态对于英雄选择决策和面对该线上对手时的游戏内策略至关重要。
破败之王对战无极剑圣对线阶段分析
无极剑圣在对线阶段对阵破败之王时更有优势，赢得5个关键统计类别中的3个。无极剑圣在补刀, 伤害 和 金币收入方面有优势，使其成为这场对决中更强的对线者。
Best 破败之王 Build Against 无极剑圣
铁板靴是对抗无极剑圣的最佳鞋子选择，提供破败之王在这场对决中最需要的移动速度和属性。 破败之王对抗无极剑圣表现最好的核心装备是收集者, 不朽盾弓 和 海妖杀手。这一组合给破败之王提供了对决所需的伤害、生存和功能的有效平衡。 这套出装在74场比赛中有48.6%胜率。虽然整体对决可能困难，但这一装备路径给破败之王对抗无极剑圣最好的机会。 可能需要根据队伍阵容和游戏状态进行调整，但这套出装为破败之王对战无极剑圣对决提供了最强的基础。
Early Game vs Late Game
破败之王50.9%无极剑圣49.1%破败之王42.9%无极剑圣57.1%前期（前15分钟）是破败之王和无极剑圣之间的抛硬币，破败之王以微弱的50.9%胜率优势领先（+1.8%）。个人技术和打野位置在早期对线阶段比英雄优势更重要。
无极剑圣在后期（25分钟以上）远远更强，拥有57.1%胜率——比破败之王高14.3点。长时间游戏强烈有利于无极剑圣，其技能组和成长使其成为团战和目标控制中的主导力量。
力量动态随着游戏进行而变化——破败之王早期有优势，但无极剑圣逐渐接管。然而，差距足够小，任何英雄都可以在任何阶段用正确的操作获胜。专注于在有优势时利用它们，而不是等待特定的游戏阶段。
Best 破败之王 Runes Against 无极剑圣
精密
启迪
精密和启迪符文设置给破败之王在这场困难对决中与无极剑圣竞争的最佳工具，用最优符文协同来弥补统计劣势。
英雄联盟26.7版本破败之王对线数据。下表显示破败之王对阵当前版本每个英雄的胜率、经济差和表现统计。点击任意英雄名称可查看详细对位分析，包括破败之王最佳出装、符文、对线数据和该对线的前期与后期分析。
对手 | 胜率 | 场次 | CS/分钟 | 伤害/分 | 金币/局 | 前期胜率 | 后期胜率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.37% | 268 | 1.0 | 746 | 13,711 | 50.4% | 50.3% | |
| 56.15% | 244 | 1.0 | 669 | 13,499 | 61.5% | 50.8% | |
| 47.17% | 212 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,265 | 50.9% | 42.9% | |
| 48.54% | 206 | 1.0 | 698 | 13,180 | 43.8% | 52.7% | |
| 49.50% | 200 | 1.0 | 729 | 13,527 | 47.4% | 51.5% | |
| 51.70% | 176 | 1.0 | 725 | 13,544 | 44.7% | 57.0% | |
| 44.76% | 143 | 1.0 | 724 | 13,695 | 40.3% | 48.1% | |
| 46.15% | 130 | 0.9 | 689 | 13,667 | 46.5% | 45.8% | |
| 51.16% | 129 | 1.0 | 709 | 13,774 | 52.5% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 117 | 0.9 | 851 | 13,419 | 44.4% | 47.6% | |
| 42.99% | 107 | 1.0 | 803 | 14,192 | 51.0% | 36.2% | |
| 53.85% | 104 | 1.1 | 726 | 14,204 | 58.7% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 102 | 1.0 | 771 | 13,707 | 58.2% | 46.8% | |
| 45.26% | 95 | 1.1 | 627 | 12,907 | 44.7% | 45.8% | |
| 39.56% | 91 | 1.1 | 722 | 13,061 | 31.1% | 47.8% | |
| 46.07% | 89 | 1.0 | 691 | 14,492 | 51.4% | 42.3% | |
| 46.59% | 88 | 1.4 | 734 | 13,729 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 48.28% | 87 | 1.0 | 755 | 14,349 | 36.4% | 55.6% | |
| 53.49% | 86 | 1.1 | 692 | 14,143 | 54.8% | 52.3% | |
| 53.57% | 84 | 1.0 | 716 | 13,490 | 65.2% | 39.5% | |
| 45.12% | 82 | 0.9 | 643 | 12,936 | 45.8% | 44.1% | |
| 57.50% | 80 | 1.1 | 752 | 14,714 | 44.1% | 67.4% | |
| 47.44% | 78 | 1.1 | 796 | 14,302 | 44.8% | 49.0% | |
| 47.37% | 76 | 1.0 | 700 | 12,925 | 41.9% | 54.5% | |
| 43.84% | 73 | 1.0 | 719 | 13,933 | 45.5% | 42.5% | |
| 48.61% | 72 | 0.9 | 672 | 13,343 | 42.4% | 53.9% | |
| 47.89% | 71 | 0.9 | 734 | 13,019 | 46.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.94% | 68 | 1.1 | 695 | 13,280 | 46.9% | 58.3% | |
| 53.73% | 67 | 1.2 | 726 | 13,641 | 53.9% | 53.7% | |
| 50.00% | 66 | 1.0 | 749 | 13,207 | 59.3% | 43.6% | |
| 50.00% | 62 | 1.2 | 728 | 14,056 | 51.9% | 48.6% | |
| 35.59% | 59 | 1.0 | 686 | 13,920 | 39.1% | 33.3% | |
| 50.00% | 56 | 1.6 | 822 | 14,364 | 56.5% | 45.5% | |
| 49.09% | 55 | 1.2 | 745 | 12,871 | 56.7% | 40.0% | |
| 34.62% | 52 | 0.9 | 708 | 12,054 | 26.7% | 45.5% | |
| 35.42% | 48 | 0.9 | 706 | 13,733 | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
| 39.58% | 48 | 0.9 | 663 | 12,824 | 45.0% | 35.7% | |
| 38.30% | 47 | 1.0 | 690 | 12,837 | 45.8% | 30.4% | |
| 48.78% | 41 | 0.9 | 637 | 14,508 | 28.6% | 59.3% | |
| 43.90% | 41 | 1.1 | 667 | 13,353 | 36.8% | 50.0% | |
| 55.26% | 38 | 1.2 | 864 | 14,161 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 35 | 0.9 | 745 | 14,035 | 60.0% | 55.0% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 0.9 | 650 | 12,317 | 53.9% | 40.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.1 | 711 | 13,313 | 52.4% | 30.8% | |
| 52.94% | 34 | 0.8 | 737 | 13,294 | 46.7% | 57.9% | |
| 61.76% | 34 | 1.0 | 745 | 13,998 | 65.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 1.0 | 804 | 13,647 | 37.5% | 61.1% | |
| 36.36% | 33 | 0.9 | 544 | 12,701 | 47.4% | 21.4% | |
| 31.25% | 32 | 2.2 | 735 | 12,671 | 38.9% | 21.4% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 0.9 | 696 | 13,501 | 55.6% | 58.3% | |
| 56.67% | 30 | 1.3 | 744 | 13,712 | 53.9% | 58.8% | |
| 35.71% | 28 | 1.4 | 731 | 12,698 | 41.2% | 27.3% | |
| 57.69% | 26 | 1.7 | 747 | 12,818 | 54.5% | 60.0% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 0.9 | 828 | 11,582 | 50.0% | 72.7% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 0.9 | 668 | 11,715 | 54.5% | 38.5% | |
| 50.00% | 20 | 2.2 | 717 | 11,812 | 54.5% | 44.4% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 1.0 | 594 | 12,580 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.82% | 17 | 1.8 | 886 | 17,627 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 25.00% | 16 | 0.8 | 549 | 11,752 | 10.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 3.2 | 801 | 15,495 | 100.0% | 45.5% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 1.5 | 633 | 11,945 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 1.1 | 816 | 15,518 | 66.7% | 50.0% | |
| 76.92% | 13 | 1.4 | 664 | 13,732 | 75.0% | 80.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 1.7 | 955 | 15,977 | 50.0% | 28.6% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.6 | 714 | 12,027 | 80.0% | 20.0% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 713 | 13,266 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 88.89% | 9 | 5.3 | 886 | 10,825 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 6.1 | 565 | 10,371 | 25.0% | 40.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 5.7 | 770 | 12,616 | 100.0% | 60.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 0.8 | 654 | 13,560 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.2 | 839 | 13,096 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 1.3 | 726 | 14,547 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 0.8 | 588 | 11,811 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.7 | 565 | 14,931 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 5.9 | 749 | 14,009 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 2.9 | 700 | 12,301 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 5.1 | 696 | 11,636 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.7 | 927 | 10,158 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 1.6 | 575 | 14,572 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 4.6 | 774 | 14,689 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.9 | 650 | 10,915 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.3 | 992 | 16,599 | 100.0% | 33.3% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 819 | 15,120 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 2.4 | 914 | 16,579 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
破败之王 vs 无极剑圣 - 常见问题
在英雄联盟中，破败之王对无极剑圣表现如何？
无极剑圣以52.8%的胜率赢得破败之王 vs 无极剑圣的对决，而破败之王为47.2%，相差5.7个百分点。该数据基于26.7版本的212场近期排位赛。
在前期，破败之王对无极剑圣表现如何？
在前期，破败之王对无极剑圣占有优势，胜率为50.9%对49.1%。破败之王玩家应该在前15分钟通过积极换血和控线来扩大线上优势。
在后期，破败之王对无极剑圣表现如何？
在后期，无极剑圣以57.1%对42.9%的胜率主导破败之王 vs 无极剑圣的对决。无极剑圣在25分钟后的团战和目标争夺中成长更强。
谁赢得破败之王 vs 无极剑圣的对决？
无极剑圣在英雄联盟26.7版本中以52.8%的胜率赢得对破败之王的对决。5.7个百分点的优势意味着根据212场分析的比赛，无极剑圣在这个线上对决中significantly占优。
对抗无极剑圣的最佳破败之王出装是什么？
对抗无极剑圣的最佳破败之王出装包括收集者, 不朽盾弓, 海妖杀手 with 铁板靴。This build achieves a 48.6% win rate in the matchup. 查看上方的对决分析了解完整的出装路线和顺序。
对抗无极剑圣的最佳破败之王符文是什么？
对抗无极剑圣的最佳破败之王符文使用精密主系和启迪副系。This rune setup achieves a 55.8% win rate in the 破败之王 vs 无极剑圣 matchup. 查看上方对决比较中的完整符文分析。
破败之王克制无极剑圣吗？
不，破败之王对抗无极剑圣时表现吃力，胜率仅为47.2%。无极剑圣在这个对决中占优。破败之王玩家应该专注于安全补刀，避免长时间换血以减少无极剑圣的领先优势。
如何用破败之王对战无极剑圣？
当破败之王对战无极剑圣时，谨慎游戏并避开无极剑圣的强势期。Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since 无极剑圣 has the statistical advantage at most stages. 使用上方的对决专用出装和符文来优化你的机会。