Höchste Siegrate TFT Team-Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Siegraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Rangaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 8-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: N.O.V.A. (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), Schurke (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg). N.O.V.A./Raufbold führt mit 89.29% Siegesrate und 2.64 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 88.52% Siegesrate. Analyse von 55 8-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.64
Avg Place
89.29%
Top 4 Rate
29.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.91
Avg Place
88.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
85.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.41%
Top 4 Rate
28.29%
First Place
Low Contested
3.09
Avg Place
79.75%
Top 4 Rate
23.42%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
77.84%
Top 4 Rate
23.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
75.47%
Top 4 Rate
26.42%
First Place
Low Contested
3.24
Avg Place
73.79%
Top 4 Rate
24.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
72.63%
Top 4 Rate
10.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.28
Avg Place
72.42%
Top 4 Rate
23.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.42
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
14.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.68%
Top 4 Rate
12.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
67.76%
Top 4 Rate
9.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
66.78%
Top 4 Rate
7.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.76
Avg Place
66.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
65.07%
Top 4 Rate
10.93%
First Place
Low Contested
3.76
Avg Place
64.15%
Top 4 Rate
14.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.87
Avg Place
59.68%
Top 4 Rate
17.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.04%
Top 4 Rate
14.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.25
Avg Place
55.33%
Top 4 Rate
6.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
-
4.31
Avg Place
53.25%
Top 4 Rate
7.53%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.46
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.53
Avg Place
50.20%
Top 4 Rate
8.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.62
Avg Place
47.83%
Top 4 Rate
6.14%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
5.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
46.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
42.69%
Top 4 Rate
2.31%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.90
Avg Place
41.42%
Top 4 Rate
8.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.99
Avg Place
40.92%
Top 4 Rate
6.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.18
Avg Place
39.48%
Top 4 Rate
3.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.96
Avg Place
39.34%
Top 4 Rate
4.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
38.00%
Top 4 Rate
2.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.03
Avg Place
37.43%
Top 4 Rate
6.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.34
Avg Place
33.60%
Top 4 Rate
2.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
32.68%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.32
Avg Place
32.17%
Top 4 Rate
1.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.34
Avg Place
30.13%
Top 4 Rate
3.40%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
29.74%
Top 4 Rate
5.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.76
Avg Place
28.44%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.46
Avg Place
28.13%
Top 4 Rate
5.10%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.48
Avg Place
27.63%
Top 4 Rate
2.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
27.54%
Top 4 Rate
1.93%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.56
Avg Place
26.46%
Top 4 Rate
1.06%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.61
Avg Place
26.45%
Top 4 Rate
1.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.55
Avg Place
26.06%
Top 4 Rate
1.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.43%
Top 4 Rate
0.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
25.24%
Top 4 Rate
2.59%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.61
Avg Place
24.81%
Top 4 Rate
2.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
24.61%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
22.28%
Top 4 Rate
1.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
21.69%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.98
Avg Place
19.34%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.15
Avg Place
18.99%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.79%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Low Contested
6.22
Avg Place
14.31%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 55 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 53.8K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.0% and average placement of 4.65 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Raufbold with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 88.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Raufbold at 85.4%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 88.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold: 85.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Schurke/Meeple with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replikator/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist N.O.V.A./Raufbold mit Viktor als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.64. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.

Wie spielt man die N.O.V.A./Raufbold-Komposition?

Um N.O.V.A./Raufbold zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Viktor als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Viktor und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet N.O.V.A./Raufbold die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 2.64. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind Partytiger/Scharfschütze (Ø 2.80) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.91). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?

N.O.V.A./Raufbold ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Schurke/Meeple eine Pickrate von 3.3%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie N.O.V.A./Raufbold zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.