Höchste Siegrate TFT Team-Kompositionen
Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Siegraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Rangaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 8-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: N.O.V.A. (89.3% WR, 2.6 avg), Schurke (88.5% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (85.4% WR, 2.9 avg). N.O.V.A./Raufbold führt mit 89.29% Siegesrate und 2.64 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 88.52% Siegesrate. Analyse von 55 8-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.64 Avg Place | 89.29% Top 4 Rate | 29.93% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 88.52% Top 4 Rate | 13.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.93 Avg Place | 85.42% Top 4 Rate | 21.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.80 Avg Place | 83.41% Top 4 Rate | 28.29% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.09 Avg Place | 79.75% Top 4 Rate | 23.42% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 77.84% Top 4 Rate | 23.07% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 75.47% Top 4 Rate | 26.42% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.24 Avg Place | 73.79% Top 4 Rate | 24.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 72.63% Top 4 Rate | 10.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.28 Avg Place | 72.42% Top 4 Rate | 23.74% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.42 Avg Place | 72.20% Top 4 Rate | 14.72% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 71.68% Top 4 Rate | 12.35% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 67.76% Top 4 Rate | 9.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.81 Avg Place | 66.78% Top 4 Rate | 7.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 66.51% Top 4 Rate | 18.18% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 65.07% Top 4 Rate | 10.93% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.76 Avg Place | 64.15% Top 4 Rate | 14.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.87 Avg Place | 59.68% Top 4 Rate | 17.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.07 Avg Place | 59.04% Top 4 Rate | 14.62% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.25 Avg Place | 55.33% Top 4 Rate | 6.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
- | 4.31 Avg Place | 53.25% Top 4 Rate | 7.53% First Place | Moderately Contested | |||
4.46 Avg Place | 50.20% Top 4 Rate | 8.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.53 Avg Place | 50.20% Top 4 Rate | 8.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.62 Avg Place | 47.83% Top 4 Rate | 6.14% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 5.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.71 Avg Place | 46.43% Top 4 Rate | 4.30% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 42.69% Top 4 Rate | 2.31% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.90 Avg Place | 41.42% Top 4 Rate | 8.41% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.99 Avg Place | 40.92% Top 4 Rate | 6.52% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.18 Avg Place | 39.48% Top 4 Rate | 3.24% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.96 Avg Place | 39.34% Top 4 Rate | 4.58% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 38.00% Top 4 Rate | 2.50% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.03 Avg Place | 37.43% Top 4 Rate | 6.27% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 33.60% Top 4 Rate | 2.02% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.51 Avg Place | 32.68% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.32 Avg Place | 32.17% Top 4 Rate | 1.61% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 30.13% Top 4 Rate | 3.40% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 29.74% Top 4 Rate | 5.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.76 Avg Place | 28.44% Top 4 Rate | 0.46% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.46 Avg Place | 28.13% Top 4 Rate | 5.10% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 27.63% Top 4 Rate | 2.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.38 Avg Place | 27.54% Top 4 Rate | 1.93% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.56 Avg Place | 26.46% Top 4 Rate | 1.06% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 26.45% Top 4 Rate | 1.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 26.06% Top 4 Rate | 1.77% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.72 Avg Place | 25.43% Top 4 Rate | 0.99% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.56 Avg Place | 25.24% Top 4 Rate | 2.59% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 24.81% Top 4 Rate | 2.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.63 Avg Place | 24.61% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 22.28% Top 4 Rate | 1.04% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 21.69% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.98 Avg Place | 19.34% Top 4 Rate | 1.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
6.15 Avg Place | 18.99% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.06 Avg Place | 18.79% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.22 Avg Place | 14.31% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist N.O.V.A./Raufbold mit Viktor als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.64. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.
Wie spielt man die N.O.V.A./Raufbold-Komposition?
Um N.O.V.A./Raufbold zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Viktor als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Viktor und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?
Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet N.O.V.A./Raufbold die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 2.64. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind Partytiger/Scharfschütze (Ø 2.80) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.91). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?
N.O.V.A./Raufbold ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.
Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?
In TFT Set 17 hat Schurke/Meeple eine Pickrate von 3.3%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie N.O.V.A./Raufbold zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.