Höchste Siegrate TFT Team-Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Team-Kompositionen mit den höchsten Siegraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Rangaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 8-Champion Set 17 Kompositionen: Schurke (89.3% WR, 2.9 avg), N.O.V.A. (89.0% WR, 2.6 avg), N.O.V.A. (87.9% WR, 2.7 avg). Schurke/N.O.V.A. führt mit 89.30% Siegesrate und 2.91 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. N.O.V.A. folgt mit 89.00% Siegesrate. Analyse von 54 8-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.91
Avg Place
89.30%
Top 4 Rate
15.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.64
Avg Place
89.00%
Top 4 Rate
27.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.68
Avg Place
87.92%
Top 4 Rate
25.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.92
Avg Place
82.80%
Top 4 Rate
24.01%
First Place
Low Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.53%
Top 4 Rate
22.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.17
Avg Place
77.46%
Top 4 Rate
24.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.45
Avg Place
74.75%
Top 4 Rate
15.03%
First Place
Low Contested
3.52
Avg Place
74.58%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
74.02%
Top 4 Rate
25.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
72.98%
Top 4 Rate
22.46%
First Place
Low Contested
3.45
Avg Place
72.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.76%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.52
Avg Place
72.20%
Top 4 Rate
12.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.30
Avg Place
71.20%
Top 4 Rate
23.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
68.58%
Top 4 Rate
11.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
67.05%
Top 4 Rate
8.24%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.78
Avg Place
64.84%
Top 4 Rate
14.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.92
Avg Place
61.30%
Top 4 Rate
16.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.52%
Top 4 Rate
14.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.15
Avg Place
56.39%
Top 4 Rate
11.11%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
55.44%
Top 4 Rate
12.09%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.33
Avg Place
54.68%
Top 4 Rate
6.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.40
Avg Place
54.00%
Top 4 Rate
10.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.65
Avg Place
48.65%
Top 4 Rate
4.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
47.68%
Top 4 Rate
7.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
45.99%
Top 4 Rate
5.61%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.62
Avg Place
45.77%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.84
Avg Place
44.95%
Top 4 Rate
3.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.70
Avg Place
44.66%
Top 4 Rate
7.57%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.93
Avg Place
41.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.98
Avg Place
39.64%
Top 4 Rate
7.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.11
Avg Place
38.66%
Top 4 Rate
1.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
38.30%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.05
Avg Place
37.81%
Top 4 Rate
5.60%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.01
Avg Place
35.93%
Top 4 Rate
7.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.29
Avg Place
31.73%
Top 4 Rate
4.80%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.38
Avg Place
29.93%
Top 4 Rate
4.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.75%
Top 4 Rate
3.94%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.42
Avg Place
29.59%
Top 4 Rate
3.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.48
Avg Place
29.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.11%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.41
Avg Place
28.68%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.51
Avg Place
28.18%
Top 4 Rate
1.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.56
Avg Place
27.43%
Top 4 Rate
5.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.60
Avg Place
27.22%
Top 4 Rate
1.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
26.85%
Top 4 Rate
1.68%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.68
Avg Place
25.40%
Top 4 Rate
1.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.72
Avg Place
25.12%
Top 4 Rate
1.40%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.69
Avg Place
24.40%
Top 4 Rate
0.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.02
Avg Place
21.36%
Top 4 Rate
0.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.74
Avg Place
21.02%
Top 4 Rate
1.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.94
Avg Place
20.90%
Top 4 Rate
2.43%
First Place
Low Contested
5.93
Avg Place
20.10%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.18
Avg Place
17.28%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.26
Avg Place
13.42%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 54 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 72.2K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 47.7% and average placement of 4.61 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Schurke/N.O.V.A. with Jax as the primary carry, achieving a 89.3% win rate. Following closely is N.O.V.A./Raufbold at 89.0% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Raufbold at 87.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Miss Fortune

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Raufbold which achieves first place in 27.6% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, N.O.V.A./Raufbold offers the best average placement at 2.64.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 89.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold: 89.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Raufbold: 87.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Schurke/Meeple with a 3.3% pick rate, though its 46.0% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Replikator/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Team Komps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set 17 ist Schurke/N.O.V.A. mit Jax als Hauptcarry, mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 2.91. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Klettern und platziert sich konstant in den Top 4.

Wie spielt man die Schurke/N.O.V.A.-Komposition?

Um Schurke/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, um Jax als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche früh nach Jax und unterstützenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und ziele auf deinen Power Spike bei Level 7-8. Diese Komposition hat eine Pickrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Klettern in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 bietet N.O.V.A./Raufbold die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 2.64. Andere zuverlässige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Raufbold (Ø 2.68) und Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Ø 2.91). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermöglichen stetiges Klettern.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zu spielen?

Schurke/N.O.V.A. ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 89.3% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Wann sollte man eine Komposition forcieren vs. flexibel sein in TFT Set 17?

In TFT Set 17 hat Schurke/Meeple eine Pickrate von 3.3%, was bedeutet, sie ist stark umkämpft. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwäge, zu Alternativen wie Schurke/N.O.V.A. zu wechseln. Forciere eine Komposition, wenn du früh Einheiten und Items triffst oder wenn sie nicht umkämpft ist. Sei flexibel, wenn 2+ Spieler um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.