Archiviertes Set: Diese Comps stammen aus TFT Set undefined und sind nicht mehr Teil des aktuellen Sets. Die angezeigten Statistiken stammen aus der aktiven Zeit dieses Sets.

Beliebteste TFT-Comps nach Auswahlrate

Diese Tabelle zeigt die am häufigsten gespielten TFT Set undefined Teamkompositionen basierend auf der Auswahlrate und aktuelle Meta-Trends und beliebte Strategien. Top 9-Champion Set undefined Kompositionen: Sternenvernichter (66.9% WR, 3.8 Ø), Schurke (79.3% WR, 3.0 Ø), Sternenvernichter (65.1% WR, 3.7 Ø). Sternenvernichter/Wanderer führt mit 66.95% Siegesrate und 3.75 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 79.29% Siegesrate. Analyse von 69 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set undefined Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by popularity to show what the meta is currently playing, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Replikator/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Schurke/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Replikator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Replikator/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Schurke/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Meeple/Schicksalsweber with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Set undefined Komps FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined?

Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined ist Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit Milio als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.80. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.

Wie spiele ich die Replikator/N.O.V.A. Komposition?

Um Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Milio als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Milio und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.

Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set undefined?

Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set undefined bietet Replikator/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (1.98 avg) und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold (2.14 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.

Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?

Replikator/N.O.V.A. ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.0%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.

Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set undefined?

In TFT Set undefined hat Meeple/Schicksalsweber eine Spielrate von 1.5%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Replikator/N.O.V.A.. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.

Was ist die aktuelle TFT-Meta in TFT Set undefined?

Die TFT Set undefined-Meta wird von Meeple/Schicksalsweber mit 1.5% Spielrate dominiert, followed by Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. at 0.9%. Kompositionen mit hoher Spielrate definieren die Meta, sind aber oft umkampft. Fur unumkampfte Spiele erwage weniger populare Alternativen wie Herausforderer/Schurke (0.1% pick rate).

Sollte ich es vermeiden, populare Kompositionen in TFT zu spielen?

Nicht unbedingt. Populare Kompositionen wie Meeple/Schicksalsweber (1.5% Spielrate) sind aus gutem Grund popular - sie sind stark. Wenn jedoch mehrere Spieler dieselbe Komposition umkampfen, leidet die Platzierung aller. Scoute deine Lobby fruh. Wenn 2+ Spieler dieselbe Komposition forcen, wechsle zu Alternativen, um den Kampf um Einheiten zu vermeiden.