Beliebteste TFT-Comps nach Auswahlrate
Diese Tabelle zeigt die am häufigsten gespielten TFT Set undefined Teamkompositionen basierend auf der Auswahlrate und aktuelle Meta-Trends und beliebte Strategien. Top 9-Champion Set undefined Kompositionen: Sternenvernichter (66.9% WR, 3.8 Ø), Schurke (79.3% WR, 3.0 Ø), Sternenvernichter (65.1% WR, 3.7 Ø). Sternenvernichter/Wanderer führt mit 66.95% Siegesrate und 3.75 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 79.29% Siegesrate. Analyse von 69 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.01 Avg Place | 19.83% Top 4 Rate | 2.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 36.36% Top 4 Rate | 3.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.75 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.76 Avg Place | 44.20% Top 4 Rate | 6.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.29 Avg Place | 33.61% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.63 Avg Place | 48.61% Top 4 Rate | 3.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.73% Top 4 Rate | 6.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 44.05% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.45 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.17% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.34 Avg Place | 54.48% Top 4 Rate | 6.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Set undefined Komps FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined ist Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit Milio als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.80. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.
Wie spiele ich die Replikator/N.O.V.A. Komposition?
Um Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Milio als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Milio und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set undefined?
Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set undefined bietet Replikator/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (1.98 avg) und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold (2.14 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?
Replikator/N.O.V.A. ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.0%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.
Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set undefined?
In TFT Set undefined hat Meeple/Schicksalsweber eine Spielrate von 1.5%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Replikator/N.O.V.A.. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.
Was ist die aktuelle TFT-Meta in TFT Set undefined?
Die TFT Set undefined-Meta wird von Meeple/Schicksalsweber mit 1.5% Spielrate dominiert, followed by Herausforderer/N.O.V.A. at 0.9%. Kompositionen mit hoher Spielrate definieren die Meta, sind aber oft umkampft. Fur unumkampfte Spiele erwage weniger populare Alternativen wie Herausforderer/Schurke (0.1% pick rate).
Sollte ich es vermeiden, populare Kompositionen in TFT zu spielen?
Nicht unbedingt. Populare Kompositionen wie Meeple/Schicksalsweber (1.5% Spielrate) sind aus gutem Grund popular - sie sind stark. Wenn jedoch mehrere Spieler dieselbe Komposition umkampfen, leidet die Platzierung aller. Scoute deine Lobby fruh. Wenn 2+ Spieler dieselbe Komposition forcen, wechsle zu Alternativen, um den Kampf um Einheiten zu vermeiden.