Beste TFT-Comps nach Siegesrate
Diese Tabelle zeigt die TFT Set undefined Teamkompositionen mit den höchsten Siegesraten und hilft dir, die erfolgreichsten Comps für den Ranglistenaufstieg zu identifizieren. Top 9-Champion Set undefined Kompositionen: Replikator (97.0% WR, 1.8 Ø), Schurke (95.5% WR, 2.3 Ø), N.O.V.A. (94.3% WR, 2.4 Ø). Replikator/N.O.V.A. führt mit 96.97% Siegesrate und 1.80 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. Schurke folgt mit 95.46% Siegesrate. Analyse von 69 9-Comp Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.80 Avg Place | 96.97% Top 4 Rate | 54.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.26 Avg Place | 95.46% Top 4 Rate | 32.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.38 Avg Place | 94.26% Top 4 Rate | 29.50% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.27 Avg Place | 93.97% Top 4 Rate | 31.16% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.39 Avg Place | 92.65% Top 4 Rate | 24.93% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.37 Avg Place | 92.42% Top 4 Rate | 33.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 92.22% Top 4 Rate | 42.45% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.47 Avg Place | 92.06% Top 4 Rate | 28.97% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.14 Avg Place | 91.52% Top 4 Rate | 46.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.20 Avg Place | 91.30% Top 4 Rate | 44.80% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
1.98 Avg Place | 91.00% Top 4 Rate | 57.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.52 Avg Place | 90.38% Top 4 Rate | 26.97% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.55 Avg Place | 89.60% Top 4 Rate | 25.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.76 Avg Place | 85.47% Top 4 Rate | 31.83% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.81 Avg Place | 84.04% Top 4 Rate | 32.53% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.88 Avg Place | 83.61% Top 4 Rate | 21.58% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 83.60% Top 4 Rate | 18.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.84 Avg Place | 82.86% Top 4 Rate | 27.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 81.76% Top 4 Rate | 12.79% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 81.35% Top 4 Rate | 12.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.19 Avg Place | 81.05% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.10 Avg Place | 80.65% Top 4 Rate | 18.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
2.98 Avg Place | 79.95% Top 4 Rate | 24.70% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 79.86% Top 4 Rate | 20.49% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
2.99 Avg Place | 79.29% Top 4 Rate | 26.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 13.81% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 79.28% Top 4 Rate | 12.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.40 Avg Place | 78.75% Top 4 Rate | 11.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.18 Avg Place | 78.25% Top 4 Rate | 18.31% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
2.95 Avg Place | 77.73% Top 4 Rate | 27.50% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.08 Avg Place | 77.54% Top 4 Rate | 23.19% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.34% Top 4 Rate | 15.71% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 77.08% Top 4 Rate | 19.48% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.13 Avg Place | 76.66% Top 4 Rate | 25.21% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 76.43% Top 4 Rate | 16.25% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 76.38% Top 4 Rate | 20.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.29 Avg Place | 76.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.05% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.01 Avg Place | 76.08% Top 4 Rate | 33.63% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 75.80% Top 4 Rate | 23.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.34 Avg Place | 74.47% Top 4 Rate | 18.24% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.22 Avg Place | 73.93% Top 4 Rate | 25.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.41 Avg Place | 73.89% Top 4 Rate | 17.52% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.25 Avg Place | 73.75% Top 4 Rate | 18.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 73.63% Top 4 Rate | 18.75% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.46 Avg Place | 73.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.57% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.54 Avg Place | 71.12% Top 4 Rate | 13.55% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 71.06% Top 4 Rate | 7.72% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.55 Avg Place | 70.03% Top 4 Rate | 14.54% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.67 Avg Place | 69.93% Top 4 Rate | 11.15% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.48 Avg Place | 69.26% Top 4 Rate | 23.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 66.95% Top 4 Rate | 11.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.77 Avg Place | 65.31% Top 4 Rate | 16.15% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.66 Avg Place | 65.12% Top 4 Rate | 19.63% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.94 Avg Place | 64.09% Top 4 Rate | 5.79% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.64 Avg Place | 62.99% Top 4 Rate | 28.89% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.03 Avg Place | 61.02% Top 4 Rate | 6.66% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 58.72% Top 4 Rate | 20.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 57.03% Top 4 Rate | 17.84% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.34 Avg Place | 54.48% Top 4 Rate | 6.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.20 Avg Place | 53.08% Top 4 Rate | 10.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.73% Top 4 Rate | 6.06% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.45 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.17% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.63 Avg Place | 48.61% Top 4 Rate | 3.61% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.76 Avg Place | 44.20% Top 4 Rate | 6.43% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 44.05% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 36.36% Top 4 Rate | 3.84% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.29 Avg Place | 33.61% Top 4 Rate | 2.73% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.75 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
6.01 Avg Place | 19.83% Top 4 Rate | 2.20% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Set undefined Komps FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined?
Die beste TFT-Komposition in TFT Set undefined ist Replikator/N.O.V.A. mit Milio als primarem Carry, mit einer Siegrate von 97.0% und einer durchschnittlichen Platzierung von 1.80. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen und erreicht konstant Top 4.
Wie spiele ich die Replikator/N.O.V.A. Komposition?
Um Replikator/N.O.V.A. zu spielen, konzentriere dich darauf, Milio als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Suche fruh nach Milio und unterstutzenden Einheiten, priorisiere Items, die mit deinem Carry synergieren, und versuche deinen Powerspike bei Level 7-8 zu erreichen. Diese Komposition hat eine Spielrate von 0.1%, was sie zu einer relativ unumkampften Option macht.
Welche Kompositionen sind gut zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set undefined?
Fur konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set undefined bietet Replikator/N.O.V.A. die beste durchschnittliche Platzierung mit 1.80. Andere zuverlassige Optionen sind N.O.V.A./Göttliche Duellantin (1.98 avg) und Sternenvernichter/Raufbold (2.14 avg). Konstante Kompositionen minimieren Bottom-4-Platzierungen und ermoglichen stetiges Aufsteigen.
Was ist die einfachste TFT-Komposition zum Spielen?
Replikator/N.O.V.A. ist eine gute Option fur Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 97.0%, aber nur 0.1% Spielrate, wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkampft, was das Spiel einfacher macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten naturlich finden kannst, ohne Wechsel erzwingen zu mussen.
Wann sollte ich eine Komposition forcen vs flexen in TFT Set undefined?
In TFT Set undefined hat Meeple/Schicksalsweber eine Spielrate von 1.5%, was bedeutet, dass sie stark umkampft ist. Wenn du siehst, dass andere sie spielen, erwage Alternativen wie Replikator/N.O.V.A.. Force eine Komposition, wenn du fruhe Einheiten und Items triffst, oder wenn sie unumkampft ist. Flexe, wenn du 2+ Spieler siehst, die um dieselben Einheiten konkurrieren.
Welche Kompositionen haben die hochsten Siegraten in TFT Set undefined?
Die Top 3 Siegraten-Kompositionen sind: 1) Replikator/N.O.V.A. (97.0%), 2) Schurke/N.O.V.A. (95.5%) und 3) N.O.V.A./Sternenvernichter (94.3%). Diese reprasentieren die starksten Kompositionen fur maximale LP in Ranked-Spielen.
Warum ist die Siegrate fur TFT-Kompositionen wichtig?
Die Siegrate zeigt, wie oft eine Komposition eine Top-4-Platzierung erreicht, was in Ranked LP bringt. Kompositionen mit hoher Siegrate wie Replikator/N.O.V.A. (97.0%) performen konstant gut uber viele Spiele. Beachte jedoch auch die Spielrate - stark umkampfte Kompositionen konnen in deinen Spielen schlechter abschneiden, wenn mehrere Spieler sie forcen.