Zhonya's ParadoxTFT Team Comps
Team compositions using Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 16.19. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Zhonya's Paradox as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 43 viable team comps currently building Zhonya's Paradox, with an average win rate of 56.40% across all compositions. The highest performing Zhonya's Paradox comp achieves a 86.75% win rate, primarily featuring Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast traits with Sentinel as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Zhonya's Paradox is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.45 | Top 4 86.75% | First Place 37.61% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.76 | Top 4 83.15% | First Place 30.41% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.69 | Top 4 81.88% | First Place 31.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.14 | Top 4 79.33% | First Place 19.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.14 | Top 4 76.01% | First Place 25.40% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.31 | Top 4 74.03% | First Place 19.25% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 73.35% | First Place 10.74% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 72.88% | First Place 10.06% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 71.65% | First Place 10.02% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 70.85% | First Place 30.26% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.47 | Top 4 70.75% | First Place 16.81% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.50 | Top 4 70.21% | First Place 18.06% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.24 | Top 4 69.92% | First Place 32.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.42 | Top 4 68.55% | First Place 23.78% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.98% | First Place 11.04% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.66 | Top 4 67.33% | First Place 16.05% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.70 | Top 4 67.24% | First Place 7.91% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.84 | Top 4 63.94% | First Place 8.43% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.92 | Top 4 63.92% | First Place 8.09% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.94 | Top 4 63.67% | First Place 7.16% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.91 | Top 4 62.50% | First Place 11.73% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 58.99% | First Place 10.75% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.19 | Top 4 58.30% | First Place 4.46% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.36 | Top 4 54.52% | First Place 6.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 50.16% | First Place 3.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.51 | Top 4 50.01% | First Place 7.51% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.55 | Top 4 49.51% | First Place 6.49% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.57 | Top 4 47.74% | First Place 8.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.72 | Top 4 44.82% | First Place 6.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.91 | Top 4 44.42% | First Place 3.08% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.99 | Top 4 43.00% | First Place 2.94% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.95 | Top 4 41.88% | First Place 2.69% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.91 | Top 4 40.63% | First Place 2.41% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.99 | Top 4 39.68% | First Place 5.08% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.15 | Top 4 36.19% | First Place 3.02% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.14 | Top 4 35.65% | First Place 3.62% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.23 | Top 4 34.54% | First Place 1.93% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 33.87% | First Place 4.66% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.37 | Top 4 33.80% | First Place 2.30% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 32.35% | First Place 3.92% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.37 | Top 4 31.35% | First Place 2.05% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.42 | Top 4 29.97% | First Place 2.27% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.56 | Top 4 27.74% | First Place 2.21% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Zhonya's Paradox Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 18 achieves a 86.75% win rate with a 0.42% pick rate. This composition uses Brawler, Invoker, and Riftbeast traits and is picked in 0.42% of games featuring Zhonya's Paradox.
How many team comps use Zhonya's Paradox in TFT?
There are 43 viable team compositions that commonly build Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 18. Zhonya's Paradox appears in comps with an average win rate of 56.40% across 60,161 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Zhonya's Paradox most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 18 uses the Adaptor, Inferno, and Invoker traits with a 2.27% pick rate. This composition achieves a 49.51% win rate and average placement of 4.55.
What traits work well with Zhonya's Paradox in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Zhonya's Paradox in TFT Set 18 are Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast, Ravager, Vanguard, Emerald Aspect, and Apex Predator. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Zhonya's Paradox team compositions.