- Avg Place
- 4.42
- 1st Place
- 13.43%
- Top 4 Rate
- 50.51%
Blossom Emblem TFT Team Comps
Spatula
Needlessly Large Rod- Set
- 18
- Matches
- 565,576
- Tier
- All Tiers
- Rank
- All Ranks
- Last Updated
- Oct 7, 2026 UTC
- Methodology
- Data Methodology
- Author
- Dakota Chinnick
Team compositions using Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 16.20. View comps where carry units equip this item for maximum effectiveness.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Blossom Emblem as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 35 viable team comps currently building Blossom Emblem, with an average win rate of 54.11% across all compositions. The highest performing Blossom Emblem comp achieves a 85.82% win rate, primarily featuring Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast traits with Elder Dragon as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Blossom Emblem is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
Avg Place 2.45 | Top 4 85.82% | First Place 37.34% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 2.83 | Top 4 82.19% | First Place 29.11% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.10 | Top 4 76.33% | First Place 26.64% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.16 | Top 4 75.64% | First Place 21.87% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 75.27% | First Place 19.49% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.23 | Top 4 74.13% | First Place 20.28% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.39 | Top 4 73.75% | First Place 15.30% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.17 | Top 4 72.79% | First Place 29.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.45 | Top 4 71.90% | First Place 18.03% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.51 | Top 4 70.58% | First Place 11.86% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.44 | Top 4 70.04% | First Place 19.60% | Low Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.64 | Top 4 69.19% | First Place 10.96% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.28 | Top 4 69.03% | First Place 31.99% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.68 | Top 4 67.25% | First Place 9.98% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 60.80% | First Place 10.95% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 3.97 | Top 4 59.73% | First Place 9.64% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.46 | Top 4 51.82% | First Place 6.48% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.54 | Top 4 50.26% | First Place 3.82% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.56 | Top 4 49.35% | First Place 6.04% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.58 | Top 4 48.07% | First Place 7.32% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.64 | Top 4 47.50% | First Place 7.49% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.75 | Top 4 46.53% | First Place 4.51% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.70 | Top 4 44.94% | First Place 7.18% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.84 | Top 4 42.45% | First Place 3.75% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 4.89 | Top 4 41.80% | First Place 4.88% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.15 | Top 4 39.65% | First Place 4.48% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.16 | Top 4 37.00% | First Place 3.57% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.29 | Top 4 35.19% | First Place 4.81% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.35 | Top 4 33.24% | First Place 3.33% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.31 | Top 4 33.02% | First Place 2.59% | Severe Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.43 | Top 4 31.44% | First Place 2.27% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.51 | Top 4 29.07% | First Place 2.68% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.70 | Top 4 27.56% | First Place 3.55% | Moderate Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.59 | Top 4 27.29% | First Place 1.97% | High Contested Risk | |||
Avg Place 5.86 | Top 4 23.12% | First Place 0.89% | High Contested Risk | |||
Get the Winning Edge
Real-time overlays, automatic match tracking, and exclusive tools — everything you need to climb, free on your PC.
- In-game overlays
- Automatic match tracking
- Desktop-exclusive tools
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Blossom Emblem Team Comps - Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best team comp for Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 18?
The best team comp featuring Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 18 achieves a 85.82% win rate with a 0.24% pick rate. This composition uses Brawler, Invoker, and Riftbeast traits and is picked in 0.24% of games featuring Blossom Emblem.
How many team comps use Blossom Emblem in TFT?
There are 35 viable team compositions that commonly build Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 18. Blossom Emblem appears in comps with an average win rate of 54.11% across 53,856 total matches analyzed.
Which comp uses Blossom Emblem most often in TFT?
The most popular comp for Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 18 uses the Adaptor, Inferno, and Invoker traits with a 3.01% pick rate. This composition achieves a 49.35% win rate and average placement of 4.56.
What traits work well with Blossom Emblem in TFT?
The best traits that synergize with Blossom Emblem in TFT Set 18 are Brawler, Invoker, Riftbeast, Ravager, Vanguard, Emerald Aspect, and Apex Predator. These trait combinations appear in the highest win rate Blossom Emblem team compositions.