Lee Sinvs Ashe
Lee Sin vs Ashe is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Ashe wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Lee Sin based on 5 games. Lee Sin wins the early laning phase while Ashe scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Lee Sin build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup.
Lee Sin Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Lee Sin performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Ashe(40.0%)Who Wins the Lee Sin vs Ashe Matchup?
Lee Sin vs Ashe Matchup Summary
The Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Ashe wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 40.0%, giving Ashe a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Lee Sin controls the early laning stage, but Ashe outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Lee Sin needs to press advantages before Ashe reaches their power spikes, while Ashe should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Ashe leads by 1.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ashe has a strong advantage in this matchup. Lee Sin players should play defensively, prioritize safe farming under tower, and look for opportunities created by jungle pressure or Ashe overextending. Avoid prolonged trades and wait for team fights where positioning and coordination matter more. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Lee Sin vs Ashe Laning Phase Breakdown
Ashe is favored during the laning phase against Lee Sin, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Ashe holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Lee Sin100.0%Ashe0.0%Lee Sin25.0%Ashe75.0%Lee Sin dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Ashe. This lopsided early game means Lee Sin can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ashe is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Lee Sin. Extended games heavily favor Ashe, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Lee Sin must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ashe reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ashe survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Lee Sin Runes Against Ashe
Precision
Domination
The Precision and Domination rune setup gives Lee Sin the best tools to compete against Ashe in this difficult matchup, compensating for the statistical disadvantages with optimal rune synergies.
Lee Sin matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Lee Sin's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Lee Sin build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51.05% | 239 | 0.9 | 656 | 12,551 | 50.9% | 51.2% | |
| 48.21% | 224 | 0.8 | 656 | 12,544 | 47.1% | 49.2% | |
| 48.37% | 215 | 0.9 | 671 | 12,632 | 50.0% | 47.1% | |
| 48.58% | 212 | 0.9 | 697 | 12,352 | 50.0% | 47.6% | |
| 57.89% | 190 | 0.8 | 621 | 12,431 | 64.1% | 52.0% | |
| 42.93% | 184 | 0.8 | 612 | 12,263 | 43.0% | 42.9% | |
| 49.37% | 158 | 0.8 | 636 | 11,935 | 47.0% | 51.1% | |
| 44.22% | 147 | 0.9 | 634 | 12,879 | 46.0% | 42.9% | |
| 48.15% | 135 | 0.9 | 633 | 11,741 | 45.5% | 50.7% | |
| 47.93% | 121 | 0.8 | 647 | 12,482 | 55.1% | 43.1% | |
| 42.20% | 109 | 0.8 | 703 | 11,845 | 48.1% | 36.8% | |
| 43.27% | 104 | 0.9 | 633 | 12,914 | 46.3% | 41.3% | |
| 47.57% | 103 | 0.9 | 635 | 12,612 | 47.7% | 47.5% | |
| 51.46% | 103 | 0.8 | 669 | 12,202 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 62.77% | 94 | 0.8 | 671 | 13,092 | 69.0% | 57.7% | |
| 42.22% | 90 | 0.9 | 617 | 11,823 | 36.4% | 47.8% | |
| 42.53% | 87 | 1.2 | 625 | 12,309 | 36.4% | 46.3% | |
| 40.70% | 86 | 0.9 | 689 | 12,435 | 42.2% | 39.0% | |
| 49.41% | 85 | 0.9 | 662 | 12,491 | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| 53.75% | 80 | 1.0 | 675 | 11,939 | 60.0% | 47.5% | |
| 40.79% | 76 | 1.0 | 623 | 11,969 | 39.5% | 42.1% | |
| 49.33% | 75 | 0.8 | 705 | 11,649 | 54.0% | 44.7% | |
| 49.32% | 73 | 1.0 | 717 | 12,909 | 55.6% | 43.2% | |
| 61.64% | 73 | 1.1 | 724 | 13,083 | 70.0% | 55.8% | |
| 41.67% | 72 | 1.2 | 623 | 11,907 | 38.7% | 43.9% | |
| 45.71% | 70 | 0.9 | 648 | 12,233 | 51.4% | 39.4% | |
| 41.43% | 70 | 0.8 | 642 | 11,662 | 43.2% | 39.4% | |
| 50.00% | 66 | 1.4 | 663 | 11,994 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 49.23% | 65 | 0.8 | 680 | 12,840 | 48.1% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 60 | 0.9 | 647 | 12,881 | 56.5% | 51.4% | |
| 45.76% | 59 | 0.8 | 723 | 12,131 | 61.5% | 33.3% | |
| 48.28% | 58 | 0.9 | 717 | 12,082 | 53.9% | 43.8% | |
| 59.62% | 52 | 0.9 | 713 | 12,322 | 70.8% | 50.0% | |
| 45.83% | 48 | 1.2 | 681 | 11,855 | 53.9% | 36.4% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 1.5 | 706 | 12,981 | 38.9% | 60.0% | |
| 51.16% | 43 | 0.8 | 656 | 14,196 | 38.5% | 56.7% | |
| 34.15% | 41 | 1.0 | 540 | 12,736 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
| 45.95% | 37 | 2.0 | 682 | 12,851 | 50.0% | 44.0% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 0.8 | 595 | 10,743 | 61.1% | 47.4% | |
| 54.05% | 37 | 0.9 | 671 | 12,038 | 50.0% | 57.1% | |
| 55.56% | 36 | 0.6 | 700 | 11,944 | 55.0% | 56.3% | |
| 41.18% | 34 | 0.8 | 621 | 13,343 | 38.5% | 42.9% | |
| 51.52% | 33 | 0.9 | 759 | 13,464 | 58.3% | 47.6% | |
| 55.17% | 29 | 1.5 | 661 | 12,344 | 68.8% | 38.5% | |
| 60.71% | 28 | 0.8 | 666 | 12,008 | 53.3% | 69.2% | |
| 32.00% | 25 | 2.1 | 635 | 11,914 | 37.5% | 29.4% | |
| 66.67% | 24 | 0.8 | 697 | 12,043 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 62.50% | 24 | 0.8 | 632 | 11,590 | 44.4% | 73.3% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 1.5 | 735 | 11,005 | 53.9% | 50.0% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.1 | 692 | 11,806 | 41.7% | 70.0% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 0.9 | 657 | 11,068 | 40.0% | 63.6% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 3.0 | 770 | 14,264 | 100.0% | 29.4% | |
| 36.84% | 19 | 2.5 | 694 | 10,537 | 30.0% | 44.4% | |
| 31.58% | 19 | 1.0 | 712 | 14,686 | 50.0% | 26.7% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 2.4 | 689 | 13,073 | 62.5% | 27.3% | |
| 61.11% | 18 | 1.1 | 633 | 11,169 | 54.5% | 71.4% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 2.7 | 693 | 10,621 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 2.6 | 775 | 10,524 | 70.0% | 25.0% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.4 | 685 | 10,933 | 36.4% | 83.3% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 1.4 | 671 | 12,898 | 44.4% | 62.5% | |
| 41.18% | 17 | 1.1 | 607 | 12,337 | 85.7% | 10.0% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 2.1 | 731 | 11,460 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.4 | 616 | 10,781 | 30.0% | 33.3% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 1.7 | 702 | 13,953 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.1 | 730 | 12,959 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 1.4 | 615 | 11,867 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 1.6 | 580 | 9,444 | 60.0% | 71.4% | |
| 41.67% | 12 | 1.9 | 646 | 12,492 | 40.0% | 42.9% | |
| 45.45% | 11 | 2.3 | 521 | 9,983 | 42.9% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.6 | 586 | 12,279 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 0.7 | 664 | 11,788 | 40.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 1.5 | 558 | 11,903 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 4.0 | 745 | 11,622 | 40.0% | 60.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 1.9 | 801 | 13,737 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 4.9 | 694 | 12,201 | 66.7% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 5.1 | 851 | 11,795 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 6.1 | 902 | 13,830 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 1.8 | 493 | 9,839 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 4.2 | 718 | 12,240 | 25.0% | 50.0% | |
| 37.50% | 8 | 2.8 | 527 | 11,402 | 60.0% | 0.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 1.1 | 626 | 10,563 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 563 | 10,183 | 66.7% | 0.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 4.5 | 646 | 5,938 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 5.4 | 971 | 13,826 | 50.0% | 40.0% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 3.8 | 623 | 9,725 | 25.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.8 | 1,011 | 13,150 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.9 | 613 | 12,768 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 1.8 | 619 | 8,971 | 0.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.6 | 479 | 10,003 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 0.00% | 6 | 5.5 | 732 | 13,757 | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 6.1 | 893 | 12,899 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 3.6 | 745 | 9,384 | 33.3% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.3 | 1,027 | 15,715 | 100.0% | 40.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.6 | 865 | 11,984 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.2 | 829 | 14,021 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 1.0 | 539 | 13,065 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 1.9 | 674 | 11,275 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 3.8 | 653 | 5,277 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 3.6 | 897 | 12,706 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 467 | 8,465 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 6.1 | 1,071 | 11,689 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 3.4 | 398 | 8,834 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Lee Sin vs Ashe - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Lee Sin do against Ashe in League of Legends?
Ashe wins the Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Lee Sin do against Ashe in the early game?
In the early game, Lee Sin has the advantage against Ashe with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Lee Sin players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Lee Sin do against Ashe in the late game?
In the late game, Ashe takes over the Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Ashe scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup?
Ashe wins the matchup against Lee Sin with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Ashe is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Lee Sin build against Ashe?
The best Lee Sin build against Ashe includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Lee Sin runes against Ashe?
The best Lee Sin runes against Ashe use the Precision primary tree with Domination secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Lee Sin vs Ashe matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Lee Sin counter Ashe?
No, Lee Sin struggles against Ashe with only a 40.0% win rate. Ashe has the advantage in this matchup. Lee Sin players should focus on safe farming and avoiding extended trades to minimize Ashe's lead.
How do I play Lee Sin against Ashe?
When playing Lee Sin against Ashe, play cautiously and avoid Ashe's power spikes. Look for jungle assistance and team-dependent plays since Ashe has the statistical advantage at most stages. Use the matchup-specific build and runes above to optimize your chances.