
Ashevs Lee Sin
Ashe vs Lee Sin is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.10. Ashe wins with a 60.0% win rate (+20.0%) over Lee Sin based on 5 games. Lee Sin wins the early laning phase while Ashe scales better into the late game. Below you'll find the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup.
Ashe Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Ashe performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Who Wins the Ashe vs Lee Sin Matchup?

Ashe vs Lee Sin Matchup Summary
The Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 5 recent matches analyzed, Ashe wins with a 60.0% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 40.0%, giving Ashe a 20.0 percentage point advantage. Game phase dynamics play a critical role here: Lee Sin controls the early laning stage, but Ashe outscales as the game goes longer. The matchup shifts dramatically depending on game length — Lee Sin needs to press advantages before Ashe reaches their power spikes, while Ashe should focus on safe farming and hitting key item breakpoints. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Ashe leads by 1.3s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Ashe players can confidently pick into Lee Sin and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Lee Sin away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Ashe vs Lee Sin Laning Phase Breakdown
Ashe is favored during the laning phase against Lee Sin, winning 4 out of 5 key stat categories. Ashe holds advantages in farming, damage, gold income and crowd control, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Lee Sin dominates the early game (first 15 minutes) with a commanding 100.0% win rate — a 100.0 percentage point lead over Ashe. This lopsided early game means Lee Sin can dictate the pace of the lane from level 1, controlling trades, wave state, and river priority.
Ashe is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 75.0% win rate — 50.0 points above Lee Sin. Extended games heavily favor Ashe, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
This matchup features a dramatic power shift: Lee Sin must aggressively press their early advantage and close out the game before Ashe reaches their scaling breakpoints. If Ashe survives the laning phase without falling too far behind, the matchup flips in their favor. Dragon and Rift Herald control are pivotal — the team that secures early objectives can snowball or buy time to scale.
Best Ashe Runes Against Lee Sin
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Ashe to press their advantage against Lee Sin, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Ashe matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.10. The table below shows Ashe's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Ashe build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.84% | 1,492 | 6.3 | 825 | 13,025 | 51.8% | 42.0% | |
| 50.42% | 1,321 | 6.3 | 767 | 12,430 | 50.3% | 50.5% | |
| 49.90% | 972 | 6.0 | 738 | 12,540 | 50.1% | 49.7% | |
| 49.35% | 847 | 6.3 | 795 | 12,692 | 47.5% | 50.9% | |
| 53.64% | 839 | 6.3 | 791 | 12,746 | 50.4% | 56.0% | |
| 54.38% | 673 | 6.4 | 773 | 12,497 | 50.7% | 57.3% | |
| 54.79% | 438 | 6.2 | 826 | 12,847 | 57.4% | 52.7% | |
| 55.64% | 417 | 6.4 | 845 | 13,234 | 58.2% | 53.9% | |
| 50.45% | 333 | 6.2 | 772 | 12,367 | 57.5% | 45.3% | |
| 47.66% | 321 | 6.2 | 807 | 12,517 | 50.9% | 44.2% | |
| 46.91% | 307 | 5.7 | 774 | 11,725 | 50.0% | 44.5% | |
| 55.30% | 302 | 6.2 | 770 | 12,543 | 54.5% | 55.9% | |
| 50.33% | 302 | 6.0 | 702 | 11,733 | 56.9% | 44.3% | |
| 51.76% | 284 | 6.2 | 779 | 12,576 | 54.0% | 50.0% | |
| 52.81% | 267 | 6.5 | 784 | 12,595 | 55.6% | 50.4% | |
| 48.47% | 229 | 6.6 | 777 | 12,461 | 43.6% | 52.9% | |
| 53.30% | 212 | 6.2 | 775 | 12,693 | 46.3% | 59.0% | |
| 55.56% | 207 | 6.4 | 788 | 12,461 | 57.0% | 54.2% | |
| 48.95% | 190 | 6.8 | 795 | 12,507 | 49.0% | 48.9% | |
| 45.74% | 188 | 5.8 | 771 | 12,497 | 42.6% | 47.5% | |
| 48.31% | 178 | 6.3 | 802 | 12,754 | 47.0% | 49.5% | |
| 47.24% | 127 | 4.3 | 638 | 11,168 | 47.2% | 47.3% | |
| 55.36% | 112 | 5.9 | 693 | 11,989 | 50.0% | 59.7% | |
| 46.85% | 111 | 6.2 | 776 | 12,396 | 53.9% | 40.7% | |
| 42.45% | 106 | 3.9 | 633 | 10,797 | 33.3% | 47.8% | |
| 38.38% | 99 | 6.5 | 851 | 13,221 | 38.6% | 38.2% | |
| 42.42% | 99 | 6.5 | 835 | 13,123 | 45.2% | 40.4% | |
| 60.22% | 93 | 6.3 | 682 | 12,943 | 51.4% | 65.5% | |
| 46.07% | 89 | 6.2 | 827 | 12,825 | 35.3% | 52.7% | |
| 49.35% | 77 | 5.7 | 859 | 11,505 | 31.4% | 64.3% | |
| 56.92% | 65 | 6.4 | 856 | 11,990 | 52.8% | 62.1% | |
| 47.54% | 61 | 5.5 | 677 | 11,469 | 53.3% | 41.9% | |
| 46.55% | 58 | 5.1 | 685 | 13,391 | 47.6% | 46.0% | |
| 52.27% | 44 | 4.4 | 837 | 11,192 | 37.5% | 60.7% | |
| 52.50% | 40 | 5.5 | 608 | 12,488 | 41.2% | 60.9% | |
| 32.50% | 40 | 6.5 | 800 | 13,681 | 42.9% | 26.9% | |
| 39.47% | 38 | 6.1 | 826 | 13,322 | 28.6% | 45.8% | |
| 47.22% | 36 | 6.3 | 795 | 11,062 | 38.9% | 55.6% | |
| 50.00% | 34 | 6.3 | 992 | 12,845 | 37.5% | 61.1% | |
| 50.00% | 30 | 3.1 | 604 | 10,340 | 36.4% | 57.9% | |
| 51.72% | 29 | 5.9 | 698 | 12,138 | 41.2% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 1.9 | 544 | 9,306 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 73.08% | 26 | 1.7 | 680 | 10,793 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 50.00% | 26 | 2.5 | 635 | 10,524 | 63.6% | 40.0% | |
| 50.00% | 24 | 6.2 | 685 | 13,131 | 30.0% | 64.3% | |
| 45.83% | 24 | 1.9 | 597 | 9,485 | 33.3% | 53.3% | |
| 52.17% | 23 | 3.3 | 618 | 11,094 | 71.4% | 43.8% | |
| 54.55% | 22 | 1.4 | 580 | 9,887 | 40.0% | 58.8% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 1.7 | 647 | 10,107 | 42.9% | 57.1% | |
| 33.33% | 21 | 5.5 | 717 | 10,036 | 30.8% | 37.5% | |
| 68.75% | 16 | 6.3 | 914 | 12,306 | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| 18.75% | 16 | 5.6 | 853 | 12,197 | 0.0% | 27.3% | |
| 31.25% | 16 | 1.7 | 663 | 10,317 | 25.0% | 33.3% | |
| 86.67% | 15 | 1.8 | 575 | 9,671 | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| 33.33% | 15 | 6.1 | 803 | 11,444 | 55.6% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 2.2 | 678 | 11,181 | 100.0% | 41.7% | |
| 42.86% | 14 | 1.4 | 644 | 9,541 | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| 28.57% | 14 | 5.6 | 639 | 9,069 | 11.1% | 60.0% | |
| 53.85% | 13 | 4.9 | 804 | 13,081 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 46.15% | 13 | 1.8 | 503 | 9,022 | 57.1% | 33.3% | |
| 38.46% | 13 | 2.2 | 700 | 12,268 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 58.33% | 12 | 6.9 | 900 | 13,642 | 80.0% | 42.9% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 6.0 | 821 | 11,496 | 62.5% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 12 | 2.4 | 526 | 7,880 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.1 | 769 | 12,823 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 4.9 | 661 | 10,030 | 42.9% | 0.0% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 1.9 | 720 | 10,308 | 60.0% | 83.3% | |
| 54.55% | 11 | 2.4 | 583 | 10,131 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 30.00% | 10 | 2.2 | 782 | 9,343 | 50.0% | 16.7% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 1.9 | 742 | 9,320 | 83.3% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 5.9 | 834 | 12,811 | 60.0% | 40.0% | |
| 22.22% | 9 | 5.7 | 602 | 11,799 | 33.3% | 16.7% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.9 | 977 | 14,877 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 5.4 | 833 | 12,737 | 100.0% | 28.6% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 5.4 | 642 | 9,876 | 50.0% | 80.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 2.2 | 526 | 7,419 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 9 | 1.9 | 465 | 8,930 | 20.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 9 | 3.9 | 559 | 11,364 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.1 | 901 | 14,027 | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.5 | 568 | 9,996 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 5.3 | 662 | 9,399 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 4.3 | 600 | 10,868 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.9 | 696 | 11,615 | 25.0% | 75.0% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 5.8 | 859 | 12,435 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.7 | 984 | 11,926 | 60.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.7 | 1,010 | 12,793 | 50.0% | 33.3% | |
| 85.71% | 7 | 3.8 | 636 | 10,600 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 1.5 | 680 | 9,945 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 2.5 | 607 | 9,980 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 42.86% | 7 | 6.3 | 1,128 | 14,272 | 66.7% | 25.0% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 4.8 | 727 | 12,022 | 66.7% | 75.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 3.8 | 673 | 12,501 | 50.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.3 | 738 | 10,861 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 757 | 8,934 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 5.9 | 793 | 10,433 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.0 | 1,050 | 13,184 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 16.67% | 6 | 2.7 | 736 | 8,265 | 25.0% | 0.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 5.1 | 986 | 10,988 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 6.7 | 778 | 12,711 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 6.1 | 776 | 9,140 | 75.0% | 100.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.4 | 584 | 9,893 | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 5.4 | 873 | 12,561 | 100.0% | 20.0% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 2.5 | 639 | 10,227 | 66.7% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 984 | 14,021 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 1.4 | 645 | 8,592 | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 679 | 10,684 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 5.6 | 850 | 13,467 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 40.00% | 5 | 5.2 | 674 | 10,009 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.4 | 912 | 12,452 | 0.0% | 75.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 3.9 | 676 | 12,299 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 5.9 | 806 | 10,995 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Ashe vs Lee Sin - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Ashe do against Lee Sin in League of Legends?
Ashe wins the Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup with a 60.0% win rate compared to Lee Sin's 40.0%, a 20.0 percentage point difference. This data is based on 5 recent ranked games in patch 26.10.
How does Ashe do against Lee Sin in the early game?
In the early game, Lee Sin has the advantage against Ashe with a 100.0% win rate versus 0.0%. Lee Sin players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Ashe do against Lee Sin in the late game?
In the late game, Ashe takes over the Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup with a 75.0% win rate compared to 25.0%. Ashe scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup?
Ashe wins the matchup against Lee Sin with a 60.0% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.10. The 20.0 percentage point advantage means Ashe is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 5 games analyzed.
What is the best Ashe build against Lee Sin?
The best Ashe build against Lee Sin includes optimized core items. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Ashe runes against Lee Sin?
The best Ashe runes against Lee Sin use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Ashe vs Lee Sin matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Ashe counter Lee Sin?
Yes, Ashe has a favorable matchup against Lee Sin with a 60.0% win rate. Ashe strongly counters Lee Sin in lane based on current patch 26.10 data.
How do I play Ashe against Lee Sin?
When playing Ashe against Lee Sin, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. Play safe early and scale into your power spikes where you outperform Lee Sin. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.
