Smoldervs Cassiopeia
Smolder vs Cassiopeia is a decisive matchup in LoL patch 26.7. Smolder wins with a 71.4% win rate (+42.9%) over Cassiopeia based on 7 games. Smolder holds the advantage in both the early and late game. Below you'll find the best Smolder build, runes, laning stats, and strategies for the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Smolder Matchup Breakdown
Use the dropdown to select an opponent and see a detailed breakdown of how Smolder performs against them. You'll get head-to-head win rates, laning stats, the best build and runes for the matchup, and early vs late game analysis — all based on real ranked data.
Cassiopeia(71.4%)Who Wins the Smolder vs Cassiopeia Matchup?
Smolder vs Cassiopeia Matchup Summary
The Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup is a decisive matchup in League of Legends ranked play. Based on 7 recent matches analyzed, Smolder wins with a 71.4% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 28.6%, giving Smolder a 42.9 percentage point advantage. Smolder dominates at every stage — from early laning through late game team fights. This consistent advantage makes it difficult for Cassiopeia players to find favorable windows, so team-dependent strategies and avoiding solo confrontations are essential. The most significant statistical gap is in crowd control, where Cassiopeia leads by 0.9s CC/min — a difference that heavily influences the outcome of trades and skirmishes. Smolder players can confidently pick into Cassiopeia and play aggressively from level 1. Look to establish lane dominance early through favorable trades and zone Cassiopeia away from CS whenever possible. Understanding these matchup dynamics is essential for champion select decisions and in-game strategy when facing this lane opponent.
Smolder vs Cassiopeia Laning Phase Breakdown
Smolder is favored during the laning phase against Cassiopeia, winning 3 out of 5 key stat categories. Smolder holds advantages in farming, damage and gold income, making them the stronger laner in this matchup.
Best Smolder Build Against Cassiopeia
Crimson Lucidity is the optimal boots choice against Cassiopeia, providing the mobility and stats Smolder needs most in this matchup. The top-performing core items for Smolder against Cassiopeia are Essence Reaver, Spear of Shojin and Rapid Firecannon. This combination gives Smolder an effective balance of damage, survivability, and utility for the matchup. This build performs exceptionally well, achieving a 100.0% win rate across 1 games — well above average and making it the top item path against Cassiopeia. Adjustments may be needed based on team compositions and game state, but this build provides the strongest foundation for the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup.
Early Game vs Late Game
Smolder50.0%Cassiopeia50.0%Smolder100.0%Cassiopeia0.0%The early game (first 15 minutes) is a toss-up between Smolder and Cassiopeia, with Smolder holding a razor-thin 50.0% win rate edge (+0.0%). Individual skill and jungle proximity will matter more than champion advantage in the early laning phase.
Smolder is far superior in the late game (25+ minutes), boasting a 100.0% win rate — 100.0 points above Cassiopeia. Extended games heavily favor Smolder, whose kit and scaling make them a dominant force in team fights and objective control.
Smolder holds the advantage at every stage of the game, making this a consistently favorable matchup from lane through late game team fights. Cassiopeia players should look for outplays, team-dependent strategies, and picks rather than relying on scaling to win this matchup.
Best Smolder Runes Against Cassiopeia
Precision
Inspiration
Running Precision primary with Inspiration secondary allows Smolder to press their advantage against Cassiopeia, amplifying the strengths that make this a favorable matchup.
Smolder matchup data for League of Legends patch 26.7. The table below shows Smolder's win rate, gold difference, and performance stats against every champion in the current meta. Click any champion name to see a detailed head-to-head breakdown including the best Smolder build, runes, laning stats, and early vs late game analysis for that specific matchup.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | CS/min | DMG/min | Gold/game | Early WR | Late WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52.62% | 534 | 7.1 | 992 | 14,046 | 56.0% | 50.5% | |
| 47.30% | 482 | 7.1 | 976 | 13,628 | 51.9% | 43.8% | |
| 45.36% | 463 | 7.2 | 956 | 13,713 | 47.0% | 44.0% | |
| 52.44% | 450 | 6.9 | 993 | 14,215 | 56.3% | 50.3% | |
| 50.92% | 436 | 7.1 | 994 | 14,159 | 48.2% | 52.6% | |
| 51.72% | 319 | 7.3 | 1,036 | 14,133 | 42.0% | 59.1% | |
| 52.73% | 256 | 7.3 | 1,097 | 14,389 | 54.8% | 51.1% | |
| 54.63% | 227 | 7.0 | 1,013 | 14,121 | 53.1% | 55.8% | |
| 54.21% | 214 | 7.2 | 1,021 | 13,926 | 51.0% | 56.8% | |
| 47.18% | 195 | 6.9 | 960 | 14,143 | 48.7% | 46.2% | |
| 48.95% | 143 | 6.9 | 980 | 13,302 | 51.4% | 46.6% | |
| 51.47% | 136 | 7.3 | 1,029 | 14,300 | 50.0% | 52.6% | |
| 54.48% | 134 | 7.1 | 950 | 13,663 | 50.9% | 57.1% | |
| 45.31% | 128 | 7.3 | 955 | 13,731 | 50.0% | 40.6% | |
| 51.59% | 126 | 6.9 | 1,010 | 14,095 | 41.8% | 59.1% | |
| 50.85% | 118 | 6.9 | 941 | 13,441 | 43.8% | 55.7% | |
| 50.43% | 115 | 7.2 | 1,046 | 13,867 | 48.1% | 52.5% | |
| 46.30% | 108 | 7.8 | 1,065 | 13,693 | 45.6% | 46.8% | |
| 54.46% | 101 | 7.3 | 1,112 | 15,010 | 62.5% | 49.2% | |
| 55.81% | 86 | 7.2 | 981 | 14,565 | 51.4% | 58.8% | |
| 51.95% | 77 | 7.4 | 993 | 13,586 | 50.0% | 54.0% | |
| 48.00% | 75 | 7.4 | 976 | 13,746 | 50.0% | 46.3% | |
| 50.00% | 68 | 7.0 | 897 | 13,084 | 39.3% | 57.5% | |
| 57.35% | 68 | 7.3 | 978 | 14,711 | 42.1% | 63.3% | |
| 43.10% | 58 | 7.4 | 1,047 | 13,679 | 56.0% | 33.3% | |
| 56.90% | 58 | 7.0 | 968 | 14,398 | 65.0% | 52.6% | |
| 56.60% | 53 | 7.1 | 999 | 14,080 | 45.8% | 65.5% | |
| 65.38% | 52 | 7.3 | 1,096 | 14,858 | 65.0% | 65.6% | |
| 60.42% | 48 | 7.1 | 1,063 | 13,560 | 54.5% | 65.4% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 7.2 | 1,301 | 14,841 | 66.7% | 38.1% | |
| 50.00% | 42 | 6.7 | 780 | 12,280 | 41.2% | 56.0% | |
| 60.53% | 38 | 7.3 | 1,033 | 14,214 | 46.7% | 69.6% | |
| 34.21% | 38 | 7.6 | 1,115 | 15,419 | 38.5% | 32.0% | |
| 34.62% | 26 | 7.1 | 1,136 | 12,458 | 36.4% | 33.3% | |
| 42.31% | 26 | 7.2 | 1,011 | 13,331 | 66.7% | 29.4% | |
| 47.62% | 21 | 7.2 | 972 | 15,830 | 60.0% | 43.8% | |
| 52.38% | 21 | 7.5 | 958 | 12,399 | 50.0% | 55.6% | |
| 66.67% | 18 | 7.1 | 929 | 12,163 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 55.56% | 18 | 7.2 | 1,032 | 13,043 | 62.5% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 18 | 7.5 | 1,201 | 14,302 | 40.0% | 53.9% | |
| 70.59% | 17 | 7.2 | 755 | 10,876 | 55.6% | 87.5% | |
| 52.94% | 17 | 7.0 | 1,133 | 16,242 | 50.0% | 53.9% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 7.5 | 850 | 13,446 | 0.0% | 63.6% | |
| 43.75% | 16 | 6.6 | 997 | 14,016 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 40.00% | 15 | 7.0 | 1,114 | 12,840 | 40.0% | 40.0% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 6.7 | 865 | 13,598 | 20.0% | 80.0% | |
| 46.67% | 15 | 7.9 | 946 | 12,895 | 44.4% | 50.0% | |
| 57.14% | 14 | 6.6 | 1,284 | 12,603 | 50.0% | 62.5% | |
| 50.00% | 14 | 7.3 | 860 | 12,605 | 57.1% | 42.9% | |
| 61.54% | 13 | 7.2 | 828 | 13,365 | 80.0% | 50.0% | |
| 23.08% | 13 | 7.4 | 981 | 13,847 | 25.0% | 22.2% | |
| 30.77% | 13 | 7.0 | 817 | 12,405 | 0.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 7.2 | 875 | 13,165 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 7.0 | 1,161 | 10,970 | 66.7% | 66.7% | |
| 66.67% | 12 | 7.1 | 889 | 14,471 | 75.0% | 62.5% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 7.4 | 1,363 | 13,527 | 16.7% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 12 | 6.5 | 720 | 11,125 | 33.3% | 33.3% | |
| 27.27% | 11 | 6.6 | 1,128 | 13,784 | 33.3% | 25.0% | |
| 81.82% | 11 | 8.1 | 1,047 | 13,715 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 36.36% | 11 | 7.5 | 977 | 11,225 | 25.0% | 42.9% | |
| 72.73% | 11 | 7.3 | 1,237 | 15,324 | 75.0% | 71.4% | |
| 50.00% | 10 | 8.2 | 940 | 13,852 | 75.0% | 33.3% | |
| 70.00% | 10 | 7.0 | 1,084 | 15,758 | 100.0% | 62.5% | |
| 60.00% | 10 | 6.9 | 1,316 | 12,805 | 83.3% | 25.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 7.4 | 1,171 | 14,080 | 50.0% | 60.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 6.8 | 973 | 12,682 | 33.3% | 50.0% | |
| 100.00% | 9 | 7.9 | 1,031 | 13,078 | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| 55.56% | 9 | 6.3 | 796 | 10,731 | 33.3% | 100.0% | |
| 44.44% | 9 | 7.4 | 1,015 | 13,309 | 25.0% | 60.0% | |
| 75.00% | 8 | 6.8 | 1,093 | 11,746 | 83.3% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 8.4 | 1,332 | 11,265 | 40.0% | 66.7% | |
| 25.00% | 8 | 6.9 | 851 | 11,512 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 6.8 | 785 | 12,861 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 50.00% | 8 | 6.8 | 804 | 10,653 | 33.3% | 60.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.2 | 985 | 14,265 | 100.0% | 25.0% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 6.3 | 1,002 | 13,829 | 100.0% | 16.7% | |
| 28.57% | 7 | 8.1 | 843 | 12,081 | 0.0% | 40.0% | |
| 57.14% | 7 | 7.5 | 1,065 | 16,642 | 0.0% | 66.7% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 7.5 | 1,114 | 15,154 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 83.33% | 6 | 7.2 | 1,088 | 15,496 | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.0 | 937 | 14,440 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| 66.67% | 6 | 7.0 | 1,194 | 12,231 | 75.0% | 50.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 6.3 | 574 | 10,403 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 7.1 | 1,022 | 15,031 | 0.0% | 33.3% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 1,167 | 14,481 | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 6.9 | 1,062 | 14,583 | 100.0% | 50.0% | |
| 60.00% | 5 | 7.6 | 1,402 | 14,307 | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 956 | 11,937 | 66.7% | 100.0% | |
| 20.00% | 5 | 7.0 | 1,233 | 17,257 | 0.0% | 20.0% | |
| 80.00% | 5 | 7.1 | 1,127 | 15,057 | 100.0% | 66.7% | |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Smolder vs Cassiopeia - Frequently Asked Questions
How does Smolder do against Cassiopeia in League of Legends?
Smolder wins the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 71.4% win rate compared to Cassiopeia's 28.6%, a 42.9 percentage point difference. This data is based on 7 recent ranked games in patch 26.7.
How does Smolder do against Cassiopeia in the early game?
In the early game, Smolder has the advantage against Cassiopeia with a 50.0% win rate versus 50.0%. Smolder players should look to press their lane advantage through aggressive trades and wave control during the first 15 minutes.
How does Smolder do against Cassiopeia in the late game?
In the late game, Smolder takes over the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup with a 100.0% win rate compared to 0.0%. Smolder scales better into team fights and objective contests after 25 minutes.
Who wins the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup?
Smolder wins the matchup against Cassiopeia with a 71.4% win rate in League of Legends patch 26.7. The 42.9 percentage point advantage means Smolder is significantly favored in this lane matchup based on 7 games analyzed.
What is the best Smolder build against Cassiopeia?
The best Smolder build against Cassiopeia includes Essence Reaver, Spear of Shojin, Rapid Firecannon with Crimson Lucidity. This build achieves a 100.0% win rate in the matchup. Check the matchup breakdown above for the full item path and build order.
What are the best Smolder runes against Cassiopeia?
The best Smolder runes against Cassiopeia use the Precision primary tree with Inspiration secondary. This rune setup achieves a 100.0% win rate in the Smolder vs Cassiopeia matchup. See the full rune breakdown in the matchup comparison above.
Does Smolder counter Cassiopeia?
Yes, Smolder has a favorable matchup against Cassiopeia with a 71.4% win rate. Smolder strongly counters Cassiopeia in lane based on current patch 26.7 data.
How do I play Smolder against Cassiopeia?
When playing Smolder against Cassiopeia, leverage your statistical advantages by trading aggressively during favorable windows. You have early game priority — look for kills and zone control before first recall. Build the recommended items and runes for this specific matchup for the best results.