Chamber vs CypherMatchup
Chamber vs Cypher matchup guide: Cypher leads with a 56.7% win rate, but Chamber can still win. Learn how Chamber's 132 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 60-match dataset into ranked wins.
Chamber Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Chamber's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Cypher(43.3%)Who Wins the Chamber vs Cypher Matchup?
Chamber vs Cypher Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 60 matches reveals that Cypher holds a clear advantage over Chamber in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Chamber shows strength in one category, Cypher's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Chamber vs Cypher Matchup Summary
The Chamber vs Cypher matchup in Valorant is a heavily one-sided matchup. Based on 60 competitive matches analyzed, Cypher wins 56.7% of the time compared to Chamber's 43.3%, a 13.3 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Cypher consistently outperforms. In this Sentinel vs Sentinel matchup, Cypher has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Chamber should never take isolated fights against Cypher and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Chamber vs Cypher Fragging Analysis
Cypher claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Chamber vs Cypher matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 60 ranked games reveals Cypher consistently outperforms Chamber in direct combat scenarios. While Chamber manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Cypher in gunfights. Chamber players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Cypher dominates.
Chamber vs Cypher Attack and Defense Performance
46.7%50.0%50.0%53.3%Attack Side Breakdown
Cypher holds a meaningful attack-side advantage in the Chamber vs Cypher matchup, winning 50.0% of offensive rounds compared to 46.7% for Chamber. This 3.3 percentage point gap translates to real tactical implications that both sides should account for in their attack-side strategies.
Our analysis of 60 matches reveals Cypher's kit enables more effective site executions across multiple dimensions. Whether through superior entry tools, better post-plant utility, or stronger mid-round adaptability, Cypher consistently converts attack rounds at a higher rate. Chamber teams need to acknowledge this disadvantage and adjust accordingly — consider running more coordinated executes, prioritizing trades over individual plays, and using utility to create advantages before committing to site takes.
Entry fragging dynamics shift noticeably in Cypher's favor in this matchup. When Cypher takes the first duel on a site execute, they convert at a meaningfully higher rate than Chamber. For Chamber players, this means being more selective about entry timings — wait for utility to clear angles, ensure a teammate is positioned to trade, or look for off-angle entries that negate Cypher's advantages. Cypher can confidently take entries knowing the data supports aggressive play.
Post-plant is where Cypher's advantage becomes most pronounced. The 3.3% attack-side gap suggests Cypher excels at converting spike plants into round wins through superior defuse denial or retake resistance. Chamber should stack post-plants with multiple players when possible, communicate molly and utility timings precisely, and avoid isolated post-plant positions where Cypher's kit advantages become decisive. For Cypher, recognize your post-plant strength and play confidently for spike after successful takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Cypher demonstrates notably stronger defensive performance against Chamber, holding 53.3% of rounds versus 50.0%. This 3.3 point advantage represents meaningful tactical superiority that should influence how both agents approach CT-side play in this matchup.
Site anchor assignments should account for Cypher's defensive advantage. Cypher can confidently solo anchor sites, knowing their kit enables effective stalling and information gathering. Chamber should avoid solo anchor positions against Cypher — instead, pair with a teammate who can provide support utility, or play positions that allow quick rotates to avoid extended 1v1 holds. When attackers target Chamber's site with Cypher on the execute, expect faster site falls.
Retake scenarios meaningfully favor Cypher in this matchup. Our 60 match analysis shows Cypher converts retakes at a significantly higher rate, whether through better clearing utility, superior positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics. Chamber should never attempt solo retakes against Cypher — always wait for teammates, coordinate utility, and take the retake together. Cypher can confidently take 1vX retakes that Chamber should avoid.
Economy rounds highlight Cypher's defensive advantages. Chamber should prioritize full saves over force buys when facing Cypher, as the defensive utility gap compounds on limited economy. Cypher can play more aggressively on eco rounds, pushing for information or early picks knowing their kit provides advantages even without full utility. On full buy rounds, Chamber should ensure teammate utility covers their defensive gaps.
Overall Side Analysis
Cypher holds clear advantages on both attack (50.0%) and defense (53.3%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Chamber vs Cypher matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Cypher doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Cypher's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Cypher performs better. Chamber teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Chamber with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Chamber's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Cypher is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Cypher provides a measurable ranked advantage. Chamber players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Cypher confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Cypher wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 6.6 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Chamber isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Sentinel vs Sentinel Dynamics
Both Chamber and Cypher fill the Sentinel role in Valorant team compositions. This role mirror means teams won't face composition issues from having both agents — the question is purely which Sentinel performs better in direct competition. Our data clearly indicates Cypher is the stronger Sentinel pick when these agents face each other.
In Sentinel vs Sentinel encounters, similar ability timing and usage patterns mean both agents often use their kits in comparable ways. The winner typically comes down to which player uses their abilities more efficiently and wins the mechanical duels that follow. Cypher's statistical advantage suggests their specific Sentinel kit translates slightly better to winning these mirror encounters.
Chamber has favorable matchups against 17 agents and unfavorable matchups against 10 agents in Valorant. Chamber's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 100.0% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Breach at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49.26% | 475 | 1.29 | 141.4 | 28.9% | 47.8% | 51.2% | |
| 49.47% | 378 | 1.24 | 140.1 | 29.6% | 48.1% | 50.5% | |
| 50.54% | 277 | 1.28 | 141.9 | 30.4% | 50.5% | 50.2% | |
| 50.20% | 247 | 1.28 | 143.2 | 30.1% | 49.7% | 50.6% | |
| 53.40% | 206 | 1.27 | 139.9 | 29.1% | 47.0% | 54.8% | |
| 53.40% | 191 | 1.31 | 140.5 | 28.3% | 47.9% | 52.4% | |
| 52.22% | 180 | 1.34 | 144.8 | 29.9% | 49.5% | 51.9% | |
| 45.45% | 143 | 1.25 | 139.2 | 28.1% | 46.2% | 50.0% | |
| 51.28% | 117 | 1.21 | 135.9 | 29.4% | 47.5% | 52.7% | |
| 43.02% | 86 | 1.15 | 133.3 | 26.9% | 42.7% | 53.2% | |
| 60.00% | 70 | 1.24 | 136.0 | 30.2% | 50.3% | 51.2% | |
| 61.19% | 67 | 1.41 | 147.1 | 28.8% | 51.4% | 56.8% | |
| 43.33% | 60 | 1.16 | 131.8 | 28.7% | 46.7% | 50.0% | |
| 41.51% | 53 | 1.37 | 154.2 | 26.4% | 47.8% | 48.5% | |
| 50.00% | 48 | 1.41 | 148.8 | 31.5% | 52.3% | 51.0% | |
| 51.22% | 41 | 1.23 | 132.6 | 29.6% | 47.7% | 56.3% | |
| 50.00% | 38 | 1.39 | 150.9 | 24.9% | 49.9% | 51.9% | |
| 62.86% | 35 | 1.27 | 139.0 | 33.6% | 51.7% | 53.9% | |
| 44.12% | 34 | 1.33 | 148.6 | 24.3% | 44.3% | 51.0% | |
| 51.61% | 31 | 1.21 | 140.2 | 29.1% | 48.5% | 50.7% | |
| 38.10% | 21 | 1.20 | 129.3 | 27.3% | 51.8% | 44.1% | |
| 42.11% | 19 | 1.39 | 146.4 | 27.2% | 56.7% | 44.7% | |
| 60.00% | 15 | 1.38 | 139.6 | 27.9% | 58.5% | 48.8% | |
| 78.57% | 14 | 1.55 | 143.5 | 29.1% | 63.6% | 57.0% | |
| 33.33% | 6 | 1.24 | 149.7 | 27.5% | 37.3% | 47.0% | |
| 100.00% | 4 | 1.38 | 132.7 | 20.3% | 59.3% | 60.5% | |
| 100.00% | 3 | 1.65 | 156.7 | 18.2% | 54.5% | 65.6% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Chamber's best matchup in Valorant?
Chamber's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 100.0% win rate. Chamber excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Chamber's hardest matchup?
Chamber's hardest matchup is against Breach, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Chamber should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Chamber have?
Chamber has 17 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 10 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Chamber in difficult matchups?
When playing Chamber in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Chamber's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Chamber's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Chamber's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
