Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Skye's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Skye
41.7% WR
VS
Veto
58.3% WR
Who Wins the Skye vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 12
41.7%
Win Rate
58.3%
1.24
Avg KDA
1.19
10.8
Avg Kills
15.8
14.8
Avg Deaths
15.4
102.3
DMG/Round
139.4
26.0%
HS %
28.9%
152
Combat Score
213
49.6%
Attack WR
48.0%
52.0%
Defense WR
50.4%
Skye vs Veto Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 12 matches reveals that Skye holds a clear advantage over Veto in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Veto shows strength in one category, Skye's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Fragging Power
1.24Skye
1.19Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Skye and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.24 and 1.19 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
102.3Skye
139.4Veto
Veto delivers substantially higher damage per round (139.4 ADR) compared to Skye's 102.3 ADR. This 37.2 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Veto a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
49.6%Skye
48.0%Veto
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Skye at 49.6% and Veto at 48.0% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
52.0%Skye
50.4%Veto
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Skye posting a 52.0% win rate and Veto at 50.4%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.
The Skye vs Veto matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 12 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 58.3% of the time compared to Skye's 41.7%, a 16.7 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in damage output, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Sentinel matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Skye should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Skye vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Veto edges out Skye in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 12 matches analyzed, this Skye vs Veto matchup remains contestable for both sides. Skye shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Skye's favor.
Avg KDA
1.24Skye
1.19Veto
The KDA comparison between Skye and Veto reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Skye averaging 1.24 and Veto posting 1.19. This razor-thin margin of just 0.05 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
10.8Skye
15.8Veto
The kill differential between Veto and Skye is dramatic: 15.8 versus 10.8, representing 5.1 additional kills per game for Veto. This massive gap shows Veto consistently dominates the kill feed when these agents meet. For Skye players, this data suggests a fundamental mismatch in direct combat scenarios. Success against Veto requires reimagining your role — become the setup player, the information gatherer, the utility specialist — rather than trying to match Veto's fragging output head-to-head.
Avg Deaths
14.8Skye
15.4Veto
Skye survives longer in this matchup, dying 14.8 times per game compared to Veto's 15.4 deaths. This 0.7 death difference per match means Skye is available for more rounds, contributing to late-round scenarios and clutch situations more frequently. Veto players should examine their positioning and aggression timing — the data suggests Skye's approach to these duels results in better survivability outcomes.
DMG/Round
102.3Skye
139.4Veto
The damage differential between Veto and Skye is exceptional: 139.4 ADR compared to just 102.3. Veto deals 37.2 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Veto's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Skye struggles to even trade effectively. Skye players should treat Veto as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
26.0%Skye
28.9%Veto
Veto demonstrates notably superior headshot accuracy against Skye: 28.9% versus 26.0%. This 2.9 percentage point gap in precision means Veto ends gunfights faster, conserves more ammo, and wins more 50-50 duels where both players see each other simultaneously. Skye faces a real disadvantage in aim duels and should compensate through utility, positioning, or weapon choices that don't require headshot precision (shotguns, Odin spraying through smokes, etc.).
Skye vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Skye
49.6%
48.0%
Defense Side
Skye
52.0%
50.4%
Attack Side Breakdown
Skye demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Veto in this matchup, converting 49.6% of attacking rounds versus 48.0%. While this 1.7 point edge gives Skye slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Veto players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.
The data from 12 competitive games suggests Skye's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Veto teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.7% gap.
When taking entry duels, Skye holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Veto players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Skye can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
Skye has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 12 agents in Valorant. Skye's strongest matchup is against KAY/O with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Viper at 40.7% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Skye matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.04)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Skye's best matchup is against KAY/O, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Skye excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Skye's hardest matchup?
Skye's hardest matchup is against Viper, with only a 40.7% win rate. Against this opponent, Skye should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Skye have?
Skye has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 12 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Skye in difficult matchups?
When playing Skye in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Skye's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Skye's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Skye's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
In post-plant situations, Skye's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Veto should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.7 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.
Defense Side Breakdown
Skye shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Veto, winning 52.0% of defense rounds compared to 50.4%. This 1.7 percentage point edge suggests Skye's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Veto players to overcome.
When deciding site assignments, Skye can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.7% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Veto should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.
Skye demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Skye converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Veto should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Skye when you can wait for teammates. Skye can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.
On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.7% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Veto should be more conservative with eco aggression against Skye and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Skye can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.
Overall Side Analysis
Skye holds clear advantages on both attack (49.6%) and defense (52.0%), establishing themselves as the superior choice in the Skye vs Veto matchup regardless of map side. This consistency across both halves means Skye doesn't need to play for specific sides or rely on winning a particular half to succeed.
Skye's advantage holds across all map types and team compositions. Whether on attack-sided, defense-sided, or balanced maps, Skye performs better. Veto teams should consider compositions that can cover their weaknesses — pair Veto with strong fragging agents who can carry during their difficult matchup encounters, and ensure utility supports Veto's positioning.
For ranked climbing specifically, Skye is the objectively better pick in this matchup. If you're equally comfortable on both agents and frequently face this matchup, practicing Skye provides a measurable ranked advantage. Veto players should focus on team play, utility value, and avoiding direct Skye confrontations rather than trying to outfrag them.
The verdict is clear: Skye wins this matchup on both sides of the map. The combined 3.3 percentage point advantage across attack and defense represents a meaningful statistical edge. Veto isn't unplayable, but faces an uphill battle requiring stronger team support and more disciplined play to compete.
Initiator vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Initiator (Skye) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Skye's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Skye's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Skye advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Skye vs Veto matchup guide: Veto leads with a 58.3% win rate, but Skye can still win. Learn the combat stats and strategies to turn this 12-match dataset into ranked wins.
