Skye vs Raze matchup in Valorant
Win Rate
48.3%
Matches
145
KDA
1.45
ADR
125

Skye vs RazeMatchups

Initiator
Patch12.11
Matches532,086
RegionAll Regions
RankAll Ranks
PlatformAll Platforms
ModeCompetitive
Last UpdatedJun 19, 2026
MethodologyData Methodology

Skye vs Raze is a skill matchup with near-even win rates (48.3% vs 51.7%). Based on 145 matches, see which agent wins in KDA, damage output, attack rounds, and defense rounds to find your edge.

Metabot Logo
MetaBot Desktop
Live In-Game Overlays
Join Our Discord
Bug reports, feature requests & developer chat
Join Discord

Skye Matchup Breakdown

Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Skye's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.

Compare against an opponent
Skye - 48.3% win rate in this matchup
Skye
48.3% WR
VS
Raze vs Skye matchup - 51.7% win rate
Raze
51.7% WR

Who Wins the Skye vs Raze Matchup?

Raze wins the Skye vs Raze matchup
Winner
Raze
Matches: 145
48.3%
Win Rate
51.7%
1.45
Avg KDA
1.28
14.0
Avg Kills
16.5
14.6
Avg Deaths
16.0
124.8
DMG/Round
156.1
29.9%
HS %
20.3%
189
Combat Score
233
44.9%
Attack WR
45.9%
54.1%
Defense WR
55.1%

Skye vs Raze Performance Breakdown

Skye vs Raze matchup breakdown - overall performance winner

Analysis of 145 matches reveals that Raze holds a clear advantage over Skye in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Skye shows strength in one category, Raze's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.

Fragging Power
1.45Skye
1.28Raze
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Skye and Raze, with KDA ratios of 1.45 and 1.28 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
124.8Skye
156.1Raze
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (156.1 ADR) compared to Skye's 124.8 ADR. This 31.4 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
44.9%Skye
45.9%Raze
Attack-side performance is balanced between these agents, with Skye at 44.9% and Raze at 45.9% win rates. Success on attack will depend more on team strategy and map control than individual agent selection.
Defense Side
54.1%Skye
55.1%Raze
Both agents perform similarly on defense, with Skye posting a 54.1% win rate and Raze at 55.1%. Defensive success in this matchup comes down to crosshair placement, utility timing, and team communication rather than agent-specific advantages.

Skye vs Raze Matchup Summary

The Skye vs Raze matchup in Valorant is a moderately favorable matchup. Based on 145 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 51.7% of the time compared to Skye's 48.3%, a 3.4 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Skye consistently outperforms. In this Initiator vs Duelist matchup, Raze has meaningful advantages in this agent head-to-head. Skye players should avoid isolated duels when possible and rely on team utility and trading to overcome the statistical disadvantage.

Skye vs Raze Fragging Analysis

Skye wins fragging stats against Raze in Valorant

Skye edges out Raze in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, headshot accuracy. With only a 3-2 margin based on 145 matches analyzed, this Skye vs Raze matchup remains contestable for both sides. Raze shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Raze's favor.

Avg KDA
1.45Skye
1.28Raze
Skye holds a slight KDA edge in this matchup, recording 1.45 compared to Raze's 1.28. While this 0.18 point difference indicates Skye tends to come out ahead in engagements, the gap remains small enough that skilled Raze players can overcome it through superior positioning, utility timing, or simply winning crucial aim duels. The data suggests Skye's kit may offer marginally better tools for securing kills while staying alive, but Raze players shouldn't feel disadvantaged when taking fights in this matchup.
Avg Kills
14.0Skye
16.5Raze
Raze substantially outfrags Skye in this matchup, averaging 16.5 kills compared to 14.0 — a difference of nearly 2.5 eliminations per match. When Raze faces Skye, the data clearly shows Raze finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. Skye players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging Raze in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
Avg Deaths
14.6Skye
16.0Raze
Skye demonstrates markedly better survivability against Raze, recording 14.6 deaths per game versus 16.0. Dying nearly 1.4 fewer times per match gives Skye significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in clutch rounds, and more economic stability from staying alive. Raze players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
DMG/Round
124.8Skye
156.1Raze
The damage differential between Raze and Skye is exceptional: 156.1 ADR compared to just 124.8. Raze deals 31.4 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Skye struggles to even trade effectively. Skye players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
29.9%Skye
20.3%Raze
The headshot percentage disparity between Skye and Raze is substantial: 29.9% compared to 20.3%, a 9.6 point difference. Skye consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Skye in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Skye's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.

Skye vs Raze Attack and Defense Performance

Attack Side
Raze
Skye44.9%
Raze45.9%
Defense Side
Raze
Skye54.1%
Raze55.1%

Attack Side Breakdown

Raze demonstrates a modest attack-side advantage over Skye in this matchup, converting 45.9% of attacking rounds versus 44.9%. While this 1.0 point edge gives Raze slightly better site-taking capability, the gap remains narrow enough that skilled Skye players can overcome it through superior execution and team play.

The data from 145 competitive games suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for attack-side scenarios. This could manifest as slightly more effective entry utility, better post-plant stalling, or superior mid-round adaptability. However, Skye teams shouldn't dramatically alter their attacking approach — instead, focus on tightening execute timing, coordinating utility chains more precisely, and ensuring trades are happening when entries fail. Small improvements in team coordination can easily overcome a 1.0% gap.

When taking entry duels, Raze holds a slight statistical advantage but nothing that should change fundamental approach. Skye players should still take confident entries when they have good information or utility support. The key adjustment is ensuring you're not taking unnecessary 50-50 duels — look for angles where you have an advantage through utility, information, or teammate support. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on entries, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

In post-plant situations, Raze's slight advantage likely stems from better utility for denying defuses or controlling retake angles. Skye should compensate by being more deliberate about post-plant positioning — take spots that offer escape routes or trade potential rather than hero plays. Stack post-plants with teammates when possible, and use utility efficiently to maximize delay time. The 1.0 point gap can be neutralized through smart post-plant fundamentals.

Defense Side Breakdown

Raze shows slightly better defensive capabilities than Skye, winning 55.1% of defense rounds compared to 54.1%. This 1.0 percentage point edge suggests Raze's kit provides marginally better tools for CT-side play, though the gap remains small enough for skilled Skye players to overcome.

When deciding site assignments, Raze can slightly more confidently take solo anchor roles. Their 1.0% defensive advantage likely stems from better stalling utility, superior information gathering, or more effective site-holding positions. Skye should consider pairing with a teammate on their site rather than solo anchoring, or taking positions that allow early rotates rather than committing to extended holds. The advantage is small but worth considering in close games.

Raze demonstrates marginally better retake capability in this matchup. Whether through superior clearing utility, better post-plant positioning, or stronger clutch mechanics, Raze converts retakes at a slightly higher rate. Skye should focus on retaking with numbers — don't take hero 1v1 retakes against Raze when you can wait for teammates. Raze can be slightly more confident in isolated retake situations, knowing the statistics marginally favor them.

On eco and force buy rounds, the 1.0% gap becomes more pronounced as utility advantages compound. Skye should be more conservative with eco aggression against Raze and prioritize saving for full buys where team utility can compensate for individual disadvantages. Raze can play slightly more aggressively on force buys, knowing their defensive kit provides small but meaningful advantages even with limited economy.

Overall Side Analysis

Raze maintains a consistent but slim advantage across both sides of the map in this matchup, with 45.9% attack win rate and 55.1% defense win rate. While Raze is statistically favored regardless of map side, the margins are close enough that Skye remains highly competitive and can win games through strong individual performance.

Map choice and team composition have minimal impact on this specific matchup outcome. Both agents perform similarly across attack-sided, defense-sided, and balanced maps. Pick based on personal comfort, team needs, and broader composition considerations rather than Skye vs Raze specific factors. The slight Raze advantage doesn't change based on external factors.

For ranked climbing, don't overthink this matchup. The statistical differences are small enough that individual skill, team coordination, and game sense remain the primary factors determining outcomes. Focus on improving your fundamentals on either agent rather than trying to gain edges through matchup knowledge. Both Skye and Raze are viable ranked picks with minimal matchup disadvantage.

Bottom line: this is one of the more balanced agent matchups in Valorant. Raze has a slight statistical edge, but Skye is absolutely viable and can win through skill. If you're comfortable on Skye, don't switch to Raze just for this matchup — the difference is too small to justify changing your agent pool.

Initiator vs Duelist Dynamics

The Initiator (Skye) vs Duelist (Raze) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Skye's Initiator abilities serve different purposes than Raze's Duelist kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.

Understanding how Initiator abilities interact with Duelist counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Skye's Initiator toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Raze's Duelist kit counters others. The Raze advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.

Skye has favorable matchups against 14 agents and unfavorable matchups against 13 agents in Valorant. Skye's strongest matchup is against Harbor with a 66.7% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 28.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.

Skye matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 12.11)
Opponent
Win Rate
Matches
KDA
DMG/Rnd
HS %
Atk WR
Def WR
47.49%2591.44125.529.6%47.0%52.5%
48.28%1451.45124.829.9%44.9%54.1%
45.45%1431.36120.828.8%43.6%52.8%
51.15%1311.49130.727.9%47.6%51.3%
51.89%1061.50129.128.8%48.0%52.3%
49.49%991.53129.030.2%45.6%56.2%
53.16%791.35116.627.2%46.2%53.0%
50.67%751.35117.130.9%46.5%53.3%
53.70%541.55128.029.8%52.3%50.7%
58.33%481.50132.726.8%47.4%55.7%
41.67%481.50128.729.9%48.1%48.5%
46.67%301.62133.229.7%52.4%50.2%
48.15%271.33116.429.1%47.5%52.5%
33.33%241.30121.529.5%41.6%49.0%
57.14%211.33119.829.0%42.5%53.9%
60.00%201.45124.928.5%46.4%54.1%
52.94%171.50125.923.8%48.3%55.0%
46.67%151.30118.429.4%53.4%50.0%
57.14%141.64129.424.1%45.3%58.1%
41.67%121.35119.025.7%43.2%52.8%
44.44%91.78148.734.5%46.0%57.0%
55.56%91.45117.425.5%46.8%52.8%
37.50%81.45134.930.5%47.3%35.9%
28.57%71.1899.624.6%44.4%52.6%
57.14%71.53143.732.9%41.5%57.5%
66.67%32.00136.018.1%51.9%71.4%
66.67%31.06108.120.0%46.4%54.5%

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Skye's best matchup in Valorant?

Skye's best matchup is against Harbor, achieving a 66.7% win rate. Skye excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.

What is Skye's hardest matchup?

Skye's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 28.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Skye should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.

How many favorable matchups does Skye have?

Skye has 14 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 13 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.

How should I play Skye in difficult matchups?

When playing Skye in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Skye's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.

What stats matter most in Skye's matchups?

Key stats to analyze in Skye's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.

See Also: Other Initiators