Raze vs VetoMatchup
Raze vs Veto head-to-head analysis. Raze holds a 50.0% win rate in this competitive matchup. With 4 games analyzed, discover the key stats—KDA, damage per round, and side-specific performance—that separate winners from losers.
Raze Matchup Breakdown
Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Veto(50.0%)Who Wins the Raze vs Veto Matchup?
Raze vs Veto Performance Breakdown
Analysis of 4 matches reveals that Veto holds a clear advantage over Raze in this head-to-head matchup, winning 3 out of 4 critical performance metrics. While Raze shows strength in one category, Veto's overall statistical edge across fragging, damage, and side-specific win rates gives them the upper hand in most engagements.
Raze vs Veto Matchup Summary
The Raze vs Veto matchup in Valorant is an extremely balanced duel where aim and game sense determine the winner. Based on 4 competitive matches analyzed, Raze wins 50.0% of the time compared to Veto's 50.0%, a 0.0 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Neither Raze nor Veto has a clear statistical advantage. Victory comes down to individual mechanical skill, utility usage timing, and reading your opponent's positioning. Focus on winning your aim duels and making smart rotations.
Raze vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Veto claims 4 out of 5 fragging metrics in the Raze vs Veto matchup, establishing clear mechanical superiority with advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. Our analysis of 4 ranked games reveals Veto consistently outperforms Raze in direct combat scenarios. While Raze manages to win the remaining metric, the overall picture favors Veto in gunfights. Raze players should play around their one strength while minimizing exposure in areas where Veto dominates.
Raze vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
46.2%55.6%44.4%53.8%Attack Side Breakdown
Veto significantly outperforms Raze on attack side, achieving a 55.6% round win rate versus 46.2%. This 9.4 point disparity reveals Veto as the clearly superior offensive agent in this head-to-head, with advantages that Raze cannot easily overcome through individual skill alone.
Based on 4 matches analyzed, Veto dominates attack-side scenarios through multiple vectors. Entry success rate, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all favor Veto significantly. Raze teams must make structural adjustments to their attack approach: rely less on Raze for key fragging roles, design executes that minimize Raze's direct engagement with Veto, and consider how team composition can cover Raze's offensive weaknesses. Simply "playing better" isn't enough to overcome a 9.4% gap.
Raze should avoid entry fragging roles against Veto whenever possible. The data clearly shows Veto wins a disproportionate share of first contacts on attack. Raze players should volunteer for support roles — flashing for teammates, trading entries, or lurking to create map pressure without direct Veto confrontation. If forced to entry, wait for maximum utility support and ensure a trade is guaranteed. Veto can and should take aggressive entries, knowing statistical backing supports confident play.
Post-plant scenarios heavily favor Veto in this matchup. Raze struggles to convert spike plants into round wins at the same rate, whether due to weaker defuse denial, inferior retake resistance, or less effective post-plant positioning. Raze teams should never leave Raze alone in post-plant — always have teammates nearby for crossfires and trades. Consider giving the spike to a different player when possible. Veto should recognize their post-plant dominance and play for spike aggressively after site takes.
Defense Side Breakdown
Veto substantially outclasses Raze on defense, achieving 53.8% round wins compared to 44.4%. This 9.4 percentage point gap indicates Veto excels at core defensive tasks — anchoring sites, gathering information, stalling executes, and contributing to retakes — at a level Raze cannot match.
Raze should never solo anchor against Veto. The 9.4% defensive gap makes isolated site holds extremely unfavorable for Raze. Instead, pair Raze with a teammate, give them off-site positions that allow early rotates, or have them play supportive roles that don't require extended site holds. Veto should actively anchor difficult sites, knowing their defensive capabilities significantly exceed Raze's.
Retake dynamics heavily favor Veto. When Raze needs to retake against Veto, success requires overwhelming numbers and utility coordination — never attempt equal-number retakes and absolutely avoid solo retakes. Veto should play post-plant positions confidently, knowing Raze struggles to clear them effectively. In clutch scenarios, Veto has a significant statistical edge that Raze cannot overcome through individual skill alone.
Economy management becomes critical for Raze in this matchup. Force buying against Veto is mathematically unfavorable — the defensive gap compounds when utility is limited. Raze should advocate for full saves, ensuring full buy rounds have maximum utility to compensate for their defensive disadvantages. Veto can confidently force buy, knowing their defensive kit provides advantages that partially compensate for economic disadvantages.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (55.6%) and defense (53.8%), comprehensively outperforming Raze across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 4 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Veto holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Raze's disadvantage in this matchup. Veto outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Raze into Veto, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Raze's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Raze in isolated Veto encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Raze when you expect to face Veto frequently. The 18.8 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Veto is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Veto decisively wins the Raze vs Veto matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Veto has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Raze players facing Veto should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Veto advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
Raze has favorable matchups against 16 agents and unfavorable matchups against 6 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Phoenix with a 77.8% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Tejo at 33.3% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | DMG/Rnd | HS % | Atk WR | Def WR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.00% | 140 | 1.34 | 157.7 | 20.1% | 46.7% | 53.8% | |
| 55.00% | 80 | 1.25 | 149.1 | 19.4% | 48.4% | 55.5% | |
| 54.55% | 77 | 1.25 | 152.7 | 20.4% | 49.5% | 54.7% | |
| 61.29% | 62 | 1.41 | 163.0 | 20.9% | 48.9% | 56.7% | |
| 52.73% | 55 | 1.38 | 162.8 | 20.4% | 45.1% | 57.0% | |
| 42.59% | 54 | 1.27 | 153.1 | 20.2% | 44.7% | 50.0% | |
| 53.33% | 45 | 1.25 | 154.6 | 20.3% | 49.9% | 51.9% | |
| 42.50% | 40 | 1.26 | 151.3 | 21.0% | 47.5% | 49.8% | |
| 45.71% | 35 | 1.24 | 145.5 | 18.9% | 46.2% | 55.3% | |
| 48.00% | 25 | 1.22 | 149.2 | 21.3% | 48.9% | 48.9% | |
| 60.00% | 25 | 1.49 | 174.0 | 22.2% | 53.5% | 54.8% | |
| 42.86% | 21 | 1.20 | 155.1 | 22.3% | 43.6% | 48.5% | |
| 73.33% | 15 | 1.50 | 169.7 | 19.0% | 61.7% | 56.9% | |
| 69.23% | 13 | 1.18 | 140.9 | 18.2% | 51.0% | 54.9% | |
| 77.78% | 9 | 1.59 | 184.5 | 17.3% | 50.5% | 67.5% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.26 | 137.9 | 15.8% | 38.2% | 68.1% | |
| 62.50% | 8 | 1.24 | 153.1 | 21.5% | 43.5% | 56.2% | |
| 71.43% | 7 | 1.35 | 150.4 | 16.0% | 61.3% | 54.5% | |
| 50.00% | 6 | 1.31 | 155.1 | 20.6% | 39.1% | 54.9% | |
| 50.00% | 4 | 1.12 | 151.0 | 18.0% | 46.2% | 44.4% | |
| 66.67% | 3 | 1.72 | 203.1 | 25.5% | 50.0% | 44.8% | |
| 33.33% | 3 | 0.88 | 113.4 | 19.4% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Raze's best matchup in Valorant?
Raze's best matchup is against Phoenix, achieving a 77.8% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Tejo, with only a 33.3% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 16 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 6 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
