Select an opposing agent to view detailed head-to-head statistics. Compare Raze's performance in terms of win rate, KDA, damage output, headshot percentage, and attack/defense effectiveness — all based on real competitive Valorant match data.
Compare against an opponent
Raze
31.6% WR
VS
Veto
68.4% WR
Who Wins the Raze vs Veto Matchup?
Winner
Veto
Matches: 19
31.6%
Win Rate
68.4%
1.27
Avg KDA
1.25
15.7
Avg Kills
14.6
15.9
Avg Deaths
13.8
163.7
DMG/Round
134.2
19.8%
HS %
28.0%
243
Combat Score
199
39.7%
Attack WR
51.4%
48.6%
Defense WR
60.3%
Raze vs Veto Performance Breakdown
The Raze vs Veto matchup is closely contested, with each agent winning 2 of 4 key metrics across 19 analyzed games. Both agents bring competitive strengths to this duel, making individual skill and team composition crucial factors in determining round outcomes.
Fragging Power
1.27Raze
1.25Veto
Fragging capabilities are closely matched between Raze and Veto, with KDA ratios of 1.27 and 1.25 respectively. This near-parity means mechanical skill and positioning will often determine which agent comes out ahead in direct duels.
Damage Output
163.7Raze
134.2Veto
Raze delivers substantially higher damage per round (163.7 ADR) compared to Veto's 134.2 ADR. This 29.5 damage differential per round adds up significantly over a match, giving Raze a major advantage in trading scenarios and multi-kill potential during site executes or retakes.
Attack Side
39.7%Raze
51.4%Veto
On the attacking side, Veto dominates with a 51.4% win rate compared to Raze's 39.7%. This 11.7 percentage point gap indicates Veto is significantly more effective at executing onto sites, whether through superior entry fragging, better utility usage for site takes, or stronger post-plant positioning.
Defense Side
48.6%Raze
60.3%Veto
Veto excels on the defensive half with a commanding 60.3% win rate, far surpassing Raze's 48.6%. This 11.7 percentage point advantage demonstrates Veto's superior ability to anchor sites, gather information, and deny enemy executes through effective utility and positioning.
The Raze vs Veto matchup in Valorant is a dominant matchup where one agent significantly outperforms. Based on 19 competitive matches analyzed, Veto wins 68.4% of the time compared to Raze's 31.6%, a 36.8 percentage point difference. The most significant gap is in headshot accuracy, where Veto consistently outperforms. In this Duelist vs Sentinel matchup, Veto has overwhelming superiority in this agent matchup. Raze should never take isolated fights against Veto and must rely entirely on team coordination, utility, and crossfires to compete effectively.
Raze vs Veto Fragging Analysis
Raze edges out Veto in a competitive fragging comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, damage output. With only a 3-2 margin based on 19 matches analyzed, this Raze vs Veto matchup remains contestable for both sides. Veto shouldn't feel outgunned — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in Veto's favor.
Avg KDA
1.27Raze
1.25Veto
The KDA comparison between Raze and Veto reveals an exceptionally tight contest, with Raze averaging 1.27 and Veto posting 1.25. This razor-thin margin of just 0.02 demonstrates that neither agent has a systematic fragging advantage in this matchup. When facing each other in ranked games, success depends almost entirely on individual player mechanics, crosshair placement, and split-second decision making rather than any inherent agent kit advantage. Players on either side should approach these duels with confidence, knowing the statistical playing field is level.
Avg Kills
15.7Raze
14.6Veto
Raze secures approximately 1.1 more kills per match than Veto in this head-to-head (15.7 vs 14.6). Over the course of a typical 20+ round game, this translates to Raze contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates Raze's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though Veto can compensate through superior utility assistance, site anchoring, or clutch performances.
Avg Deaths
15.9Raze
13.8Veto
The death disparity between Veto and Raze is stark: 13.8 versus 15.9 deaths per game. Raze dies 2.1 more times per match on average, fundamentally impacting their ability to influence rounds. This suggests Raze either takes unfavorable fights against Veto or lacks the tools to disengage safely. Raze players must completely rethink their aggression patterns — prioritize information and utility over kills, always have an exit plan, and never take coin-flip duels against Veto.
DMG/Round
163.7Raze
134.2Veto
The damage differential between Raze and Veto is exceptional: 163.7 ADR compared to just 134.2. Raze deals 29.5 more damage per round on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests Raze's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while Veto struggles to even trade effectively. Veto players should treat Raze as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or utility-based damage.
HS %
19.8%Raze
28.0%Veto
The headshot percentage disparity between Veto and Raze is substantial: 28.0% compared to 19.8%, a 8.2 point difference. Veto consistently displays far superior aim precision in this matchup, turning potential trades into clean kills and surviving encounters that would kill less accurate players. For Raze, challenging Veto in a fair aim duel is statistically unwise. Success requires creating unfair fights — off-angles, utility combinations, multi-person pressure — where Veto's aim advantage cannot fully manifest.
Raze vs Veto Attack and Defense Performance
Attack Side
Veto
39.7%
51.4%
Defense Side
Veto
48.6%
60.3%
Attack Side Breakdown
The attack-side performance gap between Veto and Raze is dramatic: 51.4% versus 39.7%, a commanding 11.7 percentage point advantage. Veto dominates offensive scenarios in this matchup to a degree that requires Raze to fundamentally change their approach to attack-side play.
Our analysis of 19 competitive matches reveals Veto has overwhelming attack-side superiority in every measurable category. Site executions, entry success, post-plant conversion, and mid-round adaptability all massively favor Veto. This isn't a gap that Raze can overcome through practice or "playing better" — it's a structural matchup disadvantage. Raze teams must build their entire attack strategy around protecting Raze from direct Veto engagement: give Raze lurk roles, put them in trade positions rather than entry, and design executes where Raze's weaknesses are covered by teammate utility.
Under no circumstances should Raze take entry duels against Veto. The 11.7% attack gap makes entry fragging against Veto one of the lowest-percentage plays in Valorant. Raze must exclusively play support roles on attack: flash for teammates, smoke for executes, trade after entries, or create map pressure through lurks that don't involve Veto confrontation. Veto should actively hunt Raze entries, knowing the statistical advantage is overwhelming.
Raze has favorable matchups against 11 agents and unfavorable matchups against 15 agents in Valorant. Raze's strongest matchup is against Vyse with a 59.1% win rate. The most challenging matchup is Veto at 31.6% win rate. Use the table below to find specific matchup details and performance metrics.
Raze matchup win rates and combat stats in Valorant (Patch 13.02)
Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.
Raze's best matchup is against Vyse, achieving a 59.1% win rate. Raze excels in this matchup through superior fragging ability and favorable utility interactions.
What is Raze's hardest matchup?
Raze's hardest matchup is against Veto, with only a 31.6% win rate. Against this opponent, Raze should focus on team coordination and utility usage to compensate.
How many favorable matchups does Raze have?
Raze has 11 favorable matchups (50%+ win rate) and 15 unfavorable matchups in Valorant. Understanding these matchup dynamics helps you make better agent picks and adapt your playstyle.
How should I play Raze in difficult matchups?
When playing Raze in difficult matchups, prioritize team coordination, utility usage, and crossfires. Avoid isolated 1v1 duels against unfavorable opponents and look for opportunities to use Raze's abilities to create advantages. Adjust your positioning based on whether you're on attack or defense.
What stats matter most in Raze's matchups?
Key stats to analyze in Raze's matchups include win rate, KDA ratio, average damage per round, and attack/defense win rates. High damage matchups favor aggressive play, while low KDA matchups suggest playing more supportively and relying on team trades.
MetaBot Desktop
Get MetaBot on your gaming PC
The desktop app is Windows-only — send yourself the link and install it next time you sit down to play.
Raze's post-plant conversion rate against Veto is catastrophic. The data shows Raze fails to hold spike plants at a dramatically higher rate than Veto. Never leave Raze alone post-plant — they need constant teammate support, crossfire setups, and utility coordination to have any chance of winning these scenarios. Consider not planting at all if Raze is the only survivor. Veto should play extremely confidently in post-plants, knowing Raze struggles to convert even favorable positions.
Defense Side Breakdown
The defensive disparity between Veto and Raze is substantial: 60.3% versus 48.6%, a 11.7 point chasm. Veto absolutely dominates CT side in this matchup — their site holds are significantly harder to break, their retake contributions more impactful, and their defensive utility more effective at every level.
Raze cannot be trusted with traditional site anchor responsibilities against Veto. The 11.7% defensive gap is too large to overcome through positioning or individual skill. Teams must protect Raze: pair them with multiple teammates, give them off-site lurk positions, or have them rotate immediately when Veto's presence is identified on their site. Veto should aggressively anchor the most difficult sites on any map, knowing their defensive capability is overwhelming.
Raze should avoid retake scenarios against Veto entirely when possible. The data from 19 matches shows Raze's retake conversion rate against Veto is dramatically lower than average. If Raze must retake, require 3+ player numbers advantage and full utility coordination. Veto should play post-plant positions knowing Raze lacks the capability to effectively contest them. In clutch scenarios, Veto wins at overwhelming rates.
Economy decisions for Raze must account for their defensive inadequacy. Force buying against Veto is essentially throwing away credits — the defensive gap makes partial buys nearly unwinnable. Raze should always advocate for full saves, building toward rounds where team utility can compensate for their individual defensive weakness. Veto can confidently force and half-buy, knowing their defensive advantages persist across all economy states.
Overall Side Analysis
Veto demonstrates commanding superiority on both attack (51.4%) and defense (60.3%), comprehensively outperforming Raze across all phases of the game. Based on our analysis of 19 competitive matches, this is one of the more one-sided agent matchups in Valorant, with Veto holding advantages at every stage.
Map selection and team composition cannot fix Raze's disadvantage in this matchup. Veto outperforms across all map types and team structures. If you're playing Raze into Veto, your team composition needs to compensate heavily: strong fragging agents to carry Raze's weight, utility-heavy supports to cover their positioning, and coordination to avoid leaving Raze in isolated Veto encounters.
For ranked climbing, avoid playing Raze when you expect to face Veto frequently. The 23.4 combined percentage point disadvantage across both sides is too large to overcome through individual skill improvement. If Veto is meta in your rank bracket, strongly consider adding them to your agent pool or playing agents that have more neutral matchups.
Final verdict: Veto decisively wins the Raze vs Veto matchup. This isn't a skill check or a "play better" situation — Veto has systematic advantages that manifest across thousands of games. Raze players facing Veto should adjust expectations, play more supportively, and recognize that direct confrontations are statistically unfavorable at every stage of the game.
Duelist vs Sentinel Dynamics
The Duelist (Raze) vs Sentinel (Veto) dynamic creates asymmetric encounters where each agent brings fundamentally different tools to engagements. Raze's Duelist abilities serve different purposes than Veto's Sentinel kit, meaning direct fights often feature non-equivalent utility exchanges.
Understanding how Duelist abilities interact with Sentinel counterplay is essential for maximizing your agent's potential. Raze's Duelist toolkit may excel at certain aspects while Veto's Sentinel kit counters others. The Veto advantage suggests their role's capabilities translate better to winning these cross-role encounters on average.
52.2%
51.1%
55.4%
51.8%
54.8%
53.0%
56.6%
49.4%
53.9%
50.6%
54.1%
52.7%
50.6%
56.3%
53.5%
55.0%
60.2%
48.2%
48.6%
45.0%
53.3%
41.7%
46.2%
67.0%
50.0%
Raze vs Veto matchup guide: Veto leads with a 68.4% win rate, but Raze can still win. Learn how Raze's 164 ADR creates opportunities to turn this 19-match dataset into ranked wins.
