Composiciones de Equipo TFT con Mayor Tasa de Primer Lugar
Esta tabla destaca las composiciones de equipo de TFT con las tasas de primer lugar más altas, perfecta para jugadores que buscan maximizar sus posibilidades de ganar partidas. Composiciones de 8 campeones del Set 16: World Ender (65.8% WR, 3.2 avg), Bruiser (78.4% WR, 2.9 avg), Juggernaut (79.5% WR, 3.0 avg). World Ender/Darkin lidera con 65.75% de win rate y 3.22 de placement promedio. Bruiser sigue con 78.45% de win rate. Analizando 70 composiciones de 8 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Traits | Avg | Win | First | Pick | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
        | 3.22 Avg Place | 65.75% Win Rate | 35.62% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
        | 2.95 Avg Place | 78.45% Win Rate | 27.59% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 2.95 Avg Place | 79.46% Win Rate | 26.49% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 3.52 Avg Place | 68.12% Win Rate | 26.09% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 2.58 Avg Place | 87.05% Win Rate | 25.90% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.02 Avg Place | 79.15% Win Rate | 23.99% First Place | 0.59% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 2.87 Avg Place | 88.24% Win Rate | 22.06% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 3.43 Avg Place | 71.67% Win Rate | 20.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 3.65 Avg Place | 73.24% Win Rate | 19.72% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.16 Avg Place | 80.04% Win Rate | 19.55% First Place | 0.53% Pick Rate | ||||
    | 4.18 Avg Place | 52.00% Win Rate | 18.00% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
     | 3.44 Avg Place | 72.88% Win Rate | 17.51% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.23 Avg Place | 76.81% Win Rate | 17.39% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.20 Avg Place | 52.14% Win Rate | 17.09% First Place | 0.13% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.56 Avg Place | 70.74% Win Rate | 15.93% First Place | 0.29% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.26 Avg Place | 76.37% Win Rate | 15.75% First Place | 0.32% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.40 Avg Place | 48.33% Win Rate | 15.00% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.52 Avg Place | 46.18% Win Rate | 14.37% First Place | 0.36% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.92 Avg Place | 59.06% Win Rate | 14.04% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.35 Avg Place | 51.06% Win Rate | 13.83% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.62 Avg Place | 39.62% Win Rate | 13.21% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.52 Avg Place | 50.00% Win Rate | 13.04% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.46 Avg Place | 41.79% Win Rate | 12.69% First Place | 0.15% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.00 Avg Place | 28.57% Win Rate | 12.24% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 3.68 Avg Place | 69.95% Win Rate | 11.40% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.48 Avg Place | 47.83% Win Rate | 10.87% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 3.62 Avg Place | 68.09% Win Rate | 10.64% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.25 Avg Place | 50.91% Win Rate | 9.09% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.61 Avg Place | 21.43% Win Rate | 8.93% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.24 Avg Place | 32.35% Win Rate | 8.82% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.44 Avg Place | 50.55% Win Rate | 8.79% First Place | 0.20% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 5.22 Avg Place | 30.43% Win Rate | 8.70% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.28 Avg Place | 58.23% Win Rate | 8.23% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.64 Avg Place | 46.12% Win Rate | 8.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.65 Avg Place | 45.35% Win Rate | 8.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
- | 4.91 Avg Place | 42.67% Win Rate | 7.41% First Place | 2.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.54 Avg Place | 48.72% Win Rate | 7.18% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.82 Avg Place | 47.62% Win Rate | 7.14% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.69 Avg Place | 41.51% Win Rate | 6.60% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.61 Avg Place | 54.10% Win Rate | 6.56% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 4.63 Avg Place | 41.30% Win Rate | 6.52% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.76 Avg Place | 41.84% Win Rate | 6.12% First Place | 0.21% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.83 Avg Place | 43.41% Win Rate | 5.85% First Place | 0.22% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.26 Avg Place | 35.72% Win Rate | 5.71% First Place | 0.90% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.48 Avg Place | 51.58% Win Rate | 5.26% First Place | 0.10% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.45 Avg Place | 23.44% Win Rate | 4.69% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.01 Avg Place | 34.82% Win Rate | 4.46% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.69 Avg Place | 20.41% Win Rate | 4.08% First Place | 0.05% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.23 Avg Place | 30.81% Win Rate | 4.07% First Place | 0.19% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.33 Avg Place | 46.15% Win Rate | 3.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.78 Avg Place | 46.27% Win Rate | 3.73% First Place | 0.35% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.64 Avg Place | 24.14% Win Rate | 3.45% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.52 Avg Place | 24.84% Win Rate | 3.27% First Place | 0.17% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.99 Avg Place | 18.07% Win Rate | 3.01% First Place | 0.18% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.16 Avg Place | 40.71% Win Rate | 2.65% First Place | 0.12% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 4.95 Avg Place | 47.50% Win Rate | 2.50% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.22 Avg Place | 34.21% Win Rate | 2.19% First Place | 0.25% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.11 Avg Place | 37.04% Win Rate | 1.85% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 6.11 Avg Place | 19.64% Win Rate | 1.79% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
   | 6.57 Avg Place | 13.85% Win Rate | 1.54% First Place | 0.07% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.15 Avg Place | 40.57% Win Rate | 1.42% First Place | 0.23% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.27 Avg Place | 34.11% Win Rate | 0.78% First Place | 0.14% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.95 Avg Place | 20.00% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.08% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.52 Avg Place | 3.85% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.51 Avg Place | 28.30% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 5.53 Avg Place | 26.32% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 5.69 Avg Place | 22.99% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.09% Pick Rate | ||||
 | 6.04 Avg Place | 16.98% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
  | 4.17 Avg Place | 62.07% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
| 4.87 Avg Place | 35.19% Win Rate | 0.00% First Place | 0.06% Pick Rate | ||||
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
Comps de equipo TFT - Set 16 FAQ
¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16?
La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 16 es Bruiser/Caretaker con Bard como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 88.2% y un promedio de posición de 2.87. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango y consistentemente queda en el top 4.
¿Cómo jugar la composición Bruiser/Caretaker?
Para jugar Bruiser/Caretaker, concéntrate en construir alrededor de Bard como tu carry principal. Busca Bard y unidades de soporte temprano, prioriza objetos que sinergicen con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada.
¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 16?
Para ganancias consistentes de LP en TFT Set 16, Caretaker/Defender ofrece el mejor promedio de posición con 2.58. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Bruiser/Caretaker (prom. 2.87) y Bruiser/Caretaker (prom. 2.95). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan las posiciones de bottom 4 y proporcionan una subida estable.
¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?
Bruiser/Caretaker es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 88.2% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.
¿Cuándo forzar una composición vs ser flexible en TFT Set 16?
En TFT Set 16, Defender/Yordle tiene una tasa de selección del 2.1%, lo que significa que es muy disputada. Si ves que otros la juegan, considera pivotar a alternativas como Bruiser/Caretaker. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos temprano, o cuando no esté disputada. Sé flexible cuando 2+ jugadores compiten por las mismas unidades.
¿Qué composición de TFT gana más lobbies en TFT Set 16?
World Ender/Darkin logra el primer lugar en el 35.6% de las partidas, haciéndola la mejor composición para ganar lobbies. Bruiser/Caretaker sigue con 27.6% de tasa de primer lugar. Si tu objetivo es ganar en lugar de solo top 4, prioriza estas composiciones de alto potencial.
¿Cuándo jugar por el primer lugar vs top 4?
Juega por el primero cuando tengas una composición de alto potencial como World Ender/Darkin (35.6% tasa de primero) y alcances tu pico de poder con objetos óptimos. Juega por el top 4 cuando estés disputado, tengas objetos subóptimos, o necesites preservar LP. En clasificatorias, top 4 consistentes suelen subir más rápido que apostar por el primero.