Composiciones de Equipo TFT con Mayor Tasa de Victoria

Esta tabla muestra las composiciones de equipo de TFT con las tasas de victoria más altas, ayudándote a identificar las composiciones más exitosas para subir en clasificatoria. Composiciones de 9 campeones del Set 17: Contendiente (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Pícaro (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Pícaro (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Contendiente/Pícaro lidera con 97.42% de win rate y 2.25 de placement promedio. Pícaro sigue con 96.39% de win rate. Analizando 62 composiciones de 9 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Contendiente/Pícaro with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is Pícaro/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and Pícaro/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Contendiente/Pícaro (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Pícaro/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Pícaro/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Contendiente/Pícaro: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replicador/Estrella oscura with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Sentenciador/Replicador follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps de equipo TFT - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17 es Contendiente/Pícaro con Kai'Sa como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 97.4% y un promedio de posición de 2.25. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo jugar la composición Contendiente/Pícaro?

Para jugar Contendiente/Pícaro, concéntrate en construir alrededor de Kai'Sa como tu carry principal. Busca Kai'Sa y unidades de soporte temprano, prioriza objetos que sinergicen con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias consistentes de LP en TFT Set 17, Pícaro/N.O.V.A. ofrece el mejor promedio de posición con 1.99. Otras opciones confiables incluyen Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (prom. 2.06) y Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (prom. 2.08). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan las posiciones de bottom 4 y proporcionan una subida estable.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Contendiente/Pícaro es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 97.4% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo forzar una composición vs ser flexible en TFT Set 17?

En TFT Set 17, Replicador/Estrella oscura tiene una tasa de selección del 1.4%, lo que significa que es muy disputada. Si ves que otros la juegan, considera pivotar a alternativas como Contendiente/Pícaro. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos temprano, o cuando no esté disputada. Sé flexible cuando 2+ jugadores compiten por las mismas unidades.