Composiciones de Equipo TFT con Mayor Tasa de Victoria

Esta tabla muestra las composiciones de equipo de TFT con las tasas de victoria más altas, ayudándote a identificar las composiciones más exitosas para subir en clasificatoria. Composiciones de 9 campeones del Set 17: Replicador (97.0% WR, 1.8 avg), Pícaro (95.5% WR, 2.3 avg), N.O.V.A. (94.3% WR, 2.4 avg). Replicador/N.O.V.A. lidera con 96.97% de win rate y 1.80 de placement promedio. Pícaro sigue con 95.46% de win rate. Analizando 69 composiciones de 9 campeones con estadísticas de rendimiento en tiempo real.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Replicador/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Pícaro/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Estrella oscura at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Replicador/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Estrella oscura (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Duelista divino which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Replicador/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Pícaro/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Estrella oscura: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Meeple/Tejedestinos with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Contendiente/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.

Reportar un problema

Comps de equipo TFT - Set 17 FAQ

¿Cuál es la mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17?

La mejor composición de TFT en TFT Set 17 es Replicador/N.O.V.A. con Milio como carry principal, logrando una tasa de victoria del 97.0% y un promedio de posición de 1.80. Esta composición es efectiva para subir de rango y consistentemente queda en el top 4.

¿Cómo jugar la composición Replicador/N.O.V.A.?

Para jugar Replicador/N.O.V.A., concéntrate en construir alrededor de Milio como tu carry principal. Busca Milio y unidades de soporte temprano, prioriza objetos que sinergicen con tu carry, y apunta a alcanzar tu pico de poder en nivel 7-8. Esta composición tiene una tasa de selección del 0.1%, haciéndola una opción relativamente no disputada.

¿Qué composiciones son buenas para subir en TFT Set 17?

Para ganancias consistentes de LP en TFT Set 17, Replicador/N.O.V.A. ofrece el mejor promedio de posición con 1.80. Otras opciones confiables incluyen N.O.V.A./Duelista divino (prom. 1.98) y Estrella oscura/Luchador (prom. 2.14). Las composiciones consistentes minimizan las posiciones de bottom 4 y proporcionan una subida estable.

¿Cuál es la composición de TFT más fácil de jugar?

Replicador/N.O.V.A. es una gran opción para jugadores que buscan una subida más fácil. Con una tasa de victoria del 97.0% pero solo 0.1% de tasa de selección, es poco probable que te disputen, haciendo el juego más fácil de navegar. Baja competencia significa que puedes encontrar naturalmente tus unidades sin forzar pivotes.

¿Cuándo forzar una composición vs ser flexible en TFT Set 17?

En TFT Set 17, Meeple/Tejedestinos tiene una tasa de selección del 1.5%, lo que significa que es muy disputada. Si ves que otros la juegan, considera pivotar a alternativas como Replicador/N.O.V.A.. Fuerza una composición cuando encuentres unidades y objetos temprano, o cuando no esté disputada. Sé flexible cuando 2+ jugadores compiten por las mismas unidades.

¿Qué composiciones tienen las tasas de victoria más altas en TFT Set 17?

Las 3 composiciones con mejor tasa de victoria son: 1) Replicador/N.O.V.A. (97.0%), 2) Pícaro/N.O.V.A. (95.5%), y 3) N.O.V.A./Estrella oscura (94.3%). Estas representan las composiciones más fuertes para maximizar LP en partidas clasificatorias.

¿Por qué importa la tasa de victoria para las composiciones de TFT?

La tasa de victoria muestra qué tan seguido una composición logra top 4, lo que da LP en clasificatorias. Composiciones con alta tasa de victoria como Replicador/N.O.V.A. (97.0%) rinden consistentemente bien en muchas partidas. Sin embargo, también considera la tasa de selección—composiciones muy disputadas pueden rendir mal en tus partidas si varios jugadores las fuerzan.