Cloak & Daggervs White Fox
El enfrentamiento Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox es muy reñido, con Cloak & Dagger obteniendo una tasa de victoria del 52.0% en 25 partidas. Duelo de soportes va para Cloak & Dagger—Cloak & Dagger proporciona 10,544 de curación versus 9,256 de White Fox, a menudo determinando qué equipo aguanta más. En este enfrentamiento parejo, los jugadores de Cloak & Dagger deben enfocarse en la coordinación de equipo y sincronizar habilidades para máximo impacto contra White Fox.
Cloak & Dagger Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for Cloak & Dagger. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
White Fox(52.0%)
Who Wins the Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Matchup?
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Matchup Analysis
In the Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox matchup, we see a meaningful advantage emerge from 25 matches of data. Cloak & Dagger wins 52.0% of confrontations against White Fox's 48.0%, a 4.0% gap that indicates a noticeable skill-independent advantage. Players should consider this matchup differential when drafting or engaging. As a Strategist mirror matchup between Cloak & Dagger and White Fox, this comes down to mechanical skill and ability usage timing. Cloak & Dagger has proven slightly more effective in these head-to-head encounters. White Fox absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 12.39, a massive +1.65 advantage over Cloak & Dagger. This indicates White Fox consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. The most significant statistical disparity is in damage output, where White Fox averages 2,034 more damage per match, translating to faster eliminations and more team fight presence. Cloak & Dagger has a slight edge against White Fox. While the statistics favor you marginally, focus on fundamentals and don't take unnecessary risks. Small advantages compound over time. As a Strategist, Cloak & Dagger's matchup against White Fox is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Combat Statistics
White Fox holds a clear combat advantage over Cloak & Dagger, winning 3 of 4 statistical categories (KDA, Kills and Deaths). This indicates a meaningful performance gap in direct confrontations.
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Impact Comparison
Cloak & Dagger3,469White Fox5,503Cloak & Dagger10,544White Fox9,256Interestingly, Strategist White Fox leads damage with 5,503 average, suggesting strong offensive capabilities or sustained poke patterns against Cloak & Dagger.
In this Strategist matchup, Cloak & Dagger significantly outpaces White Fox with 1,288 more healing per match. This sustain advantage allows Cloak & Dagger's team to win attrition fights and extended engagements.
Strategist vs Strategist Role Matchup
In this Strategist mirror matchup, Cloak & Dagger has demonstrated a 52.0% win rate advantage. Mirror matchups are the purest test of hero mastery - success comes down to ability timing, positioning, and understanding your hero's specific strengths. Study Cloak & Dagger's common patterns to improve your mirror match performance.
Datos completos de enfrentamientos para Cloak & Dagger en Marvel Rivals (temporada Season 2). Explora todos los enfrentamientos de héroes ordenados por tasa de victoria, filtra por rol, o busca oponentes específicos.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.1% | 281 | 14.89 | 19.0 | 4.0 | 4,263 | 13,294 | |
| 50.9% | 230 | 8.78 | 16.5 | 5.5 | 6,968 | 22,362 | |
| 54.0% | 198 | 11.97 | 17.9 | 4.9 | 4,337 | 13,312 | |
| 54.6% | 194 | 14.82 | 18.2 | 4.1 | 4,087 | 14,540 | |
| 47.1% | 191 | 12.51 | 18.8 | 4.6 | 4,779 | 14,277 | |
| 50.8% | 189 | 13.86 | 19.2 | 4.6 | 3,434 | 10,661 | |
| 53.0% | 164 | 12.35 | 18.0 | 4.8 | 4,895 | 16,397 | |
| 55.3% | 152 | 14.31 | 18.1 | 4.2 | 3,902 | 12,792 | |
| 56.7% | 141 | 7.82 | 16.9 | 6.2 | 8,074 | 24,723 | |
| 47.1% | 138 | 12.84 | 19.4 | 4.8 | 4,701 | 13,633 | |
| 49.6% | 127 | 16.05 | 20.2 | 4.2 | 4,111 | 12,190 | |
| 52.6% | 116 | 11.80 | 18.7 | 4.9 | 5,630 | 16,801 | |
| 61.3% | 111 | 12.33 | 18.8 | 4.9 | 4,715 | 14,967 | |
| 57.9% | 107 | 15.50 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 3,979 | 12,028 | |
| 58.5% | 106 | 12.03 | 17.2 | 4.6 | 5,049 | 18,217 | |
| 65.1% | 106 | 12.19 | 18.3 | 4.8 | 4,986 | 15,874 | |
| 44.2% | 104 | 8.54 | 15.7 | 5.8 | 6,403 | 25,463 | |
| 54.8% | 104 | 11.85 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 6,770 | 17,607 | |
| 45.1% | 102 | 13.33 | 19.1 | 4.7 | 3,946 | 11,576 | |
| 62.9% | 97 | 10.44 | 16.4 | 4.9 | 5,610 | 18,076 | |
| 61.9% | 97 | 10.04 | 17.9 | 5.5 | 6,721 | 22,729 | |
| 58.1% | 93 | 10.99 | 18.5 | 5.0 | 4,654 | 16,558 | |
| 47.2% | 89 | 9.52 | 17.5 | 5.8 | 6,931 | 25,821 | |
| 50.6% | 85 | 10.69 | 18.0 | 5.2 | 4,299 | 12,552 | |
| 61.1% | 72 | 10.82 | 18.8 | 5.2 | 7,071 | 20,566 | |
| 43.7% | 71 | 11.06 | 17.1 | 5.1 | 3,864 | 12,632 | |
| 44.3% | 70 | 10.94 | 18.5 | 5.1 | 4,694 | 14,013 | |
| 54.4% | 68 | 10.75 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 5,630 | 18,927 | |
| 50.0% | 68 | 13.90 | 20.0 | 4.4 | 3,422 | 9,425 | |
| 45.5% | 66 | 12.64 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 4,647 | 13,952 | |
| 60.0% | 65 | 11.90 | 20.2 | 5.2 | 5,574 | 17,034 | |
| 51.6% | 62 | 9.15 | 18.1 | 5.7 | 7,001 | 20,813 | |
| 65.0% | 60 | 14.65 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 3,846 | 13,994 | |
| 47.5% | 59 | 12.54 | 19.5 | 4.8 | 4,425 | 11,524 | |
| 57.4% | 54 | 12.13 | 18.2 | 4.5 | 4,678 | 11,426 | |
| 50.9% | 53 | 13.65 | 19.9 | 4.5 | 6,665 | 18,943 | |
| 51.0% | 51 | 7.69 | 14.8 | 5.9 | 6,125 | 21,842 | |
| 58.0% | 50 | 11.28 | 18.4 | 5.2 | 5,573 | 15,297 | |
| 42.0% | 50 | 11.72 | 18.8 | 5.1 | 5,110 | 15,983 | |
| 52.3% | 44 | 8.12 | 14.7 | 5.4 | 5,846 | 18,236 | |
| 69.8% | 43 | 15.98 | 21.5 | 4.4 | 3,928 | 11,452 | |
| 59.5% | 42 | 17.55 | 18.8 | 3.7 | 4,410 | 14,455 | |
| 51.3% | 39 | 11.87 | 18.3 | 4.9 | 4,026 | 14,244 | |
| 54.0% | 37 | 10.25 | 20.1 | 5.8 | 6,247 | 19,650 | |
| 38.9% | 36 | 9.49 | 17.3 | 5.9 | 3,162 | 9,390 | |
| 55.6% | 27 | 13.56 | 18.9 | 4.3 | 5,891 | 18,628 | |
| 52.0% | 25 | 10.74 | 20.5 | 6.0 | 3,469 | 10,544 | |
| 52.0% | 25 | 10.73 | 20.7 | 5.8 | 4,390 | 10,891 | |
| 73.9% | 23 | 17.13 | 18.6 | 3.7 | 4,116 | 15,501 |
¡Ayúdanos a mantener la precisión! Si notas estadísticas incorrectas, datos faltantes o cualquier problema, tu retroalimentación mejora directamente la calidad de nuestros datos para toda la comunidad.
FAQ de Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox
¿Cuáles son los mejores enfrentamientos de Cloak & Dagger en Marvel Rivals?
Cloak & Dagger rinde mejor contra Elsa Bloodstone, Hero 10572, invisible woman. El enfrentamiento más fuerte es contra Manto de anulación de magia con una tasa de victoria del 73.9%.
¿Cuáles son los peores enfrentamientos de Cloak & Dagger en Marvel Rivals?
Cloak & Dagger tiene dificultades contra jeff the land shark, Vara innecesariamente grande, squirrel girl. El contador más difícil es Black Cat con solo una tasa de victoria del 38.9%.
¿Cómo gano más enfrentamientos con Cloak & Dagger?
Como Strategist, Cloak & Dagger gana 39 de 52 enfrentamientos (>50% de tasa de victoria). Enfócate en apuntar a enfrentamientos favorables y trabaja con tu equipo para manejar oponentes difíciles.
¿Cómo rinde Cloak & Dagger contra diferentes roles?
Como Strategist, el rendimiento de enfrentamientos de Cloak & Dagger varía según el rol del oponente. Usa los filtros de rol en la tabla de arriba para comparar tasas de victoria contra Duelistas, Vanguardias y Estrategas.