Meilleur placement moyen des compositions TFT Double Up

Ce tableau classe les compositions d'équipe TFT Double Up par leur placement moyen, montrant quelles compos atteignent régulièrement les meilleurs placements. Top compositions Double Up à 8 champions Set 17 : N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler mène avec 74.19% de win rate et 3.37 de placement moyen. N.O.V.A. suit avec 67.65% de win rate. Analyse de 68 compositions Double Up à 8 champions avec des statistiques de performance en temps réel.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.

Signaler un problème

Compos TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

Quelle est la meilleure compo TFT Double Up dans TFT Set 17 ?

La meilleure compo TFT Double Up dans TFT Set 17 est N.O.V.A./Brawler avec Viktor comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 74.2% et un placement moyen de 3.37. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang avec un partenaire.

Comment jouer la compo N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up ?

Pour jouer N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up, coordonnez-vous avec votre partenaire. Concentrez-vous sur Viktor comme carry principal. Cette compo a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée. Coordonnez les assistances et les objets partagés avec votre partenaire.

Quelles compos Double Up sont bonnes pour monter en TFT Set 17 ?

Pour des gains de LP réguliers en TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler offre le meilleur placement moyen à 3.37. D'autres options fiables incluent Replicator/N.O.V.A. (moy. 3.51) et Rogue/N.O.V.A. (moy. 3.51). Coordonnez-vous avec votre partenaire pour éviter de vous contester.

Quelle est la compo TFT Double Up la plus facile à jouer ?

N.O.V.A./Brawler est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 74.2% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.

Mon partenaire et moi devrions-nous jouer la même compo en Double Up ?

En TFT Set 17 Double Up, il est généralement préférable de jouer des compos différentes pour éviter de contester les unités. Rogue/N.O.V.A. est la plus populaire avec 2.1% de taux de pick. Envisagez que votre partenaire joue N.O.V.A./Brawler comme option complémentaire.