Compositions TFT Double Up avec le meilleur taux de victoire

Ce tableau présente les compositions d'équipe TFT Double Up avec les meilleurs taux de victoire, vous aidant vous et votre partenaire à identifier les meilleures compos pour monter en rang. Top compositions Double Up à 9 champions Set 17 : N.O.V.A. (97.9% WR, 2.2 avg), Replicator (88.7% WR, 2.7 avg), Rogue (88.6% WR, 2.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler mène avec 97.87% de win rate et 2.19 de placement moyen. Replicator suit avec 88.68% de win rate. Analyse de 88 compositions Double Up à 9 champions avec des statistiques de performance en temps réel.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.19
Avg Place
97.87%
Top 4 Rate
34.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.72
Avg Place
88.68%
Top 4 Rate
22.64%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
88.61%
Top 4 Rate
24.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.46
Avg Place
87.18%
Top 4 Rate
28.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.80
Avg Place
83.67%
Top 4 Rate
26.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.83
Avg Place
82.81%
Top 4 Rate
26.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.80
Avg Place
63.41%
Top 4 Rate
17.07%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.93
Avg Place
82.61%
Top 4 Rate
28.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.78
Avg Place
82.42%
Top 4 Rate
26.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
78.57%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.12
Avg Place
80.23%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
80.00%
Top 4 Rate
23.08%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.94
Avg Place
81.48%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
81.20%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.21
Avg Place
76.32%
Top 4 Rate
21.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.72
Avg Place
59.80%
Top 4 Rate
14.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
73.51%
Top 4 Rate
18.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.17
Avg Place
76.74%
Top 4 Rate
21.86%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.68
Avg Place
65.81%
Top 4 Rate
18.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.27
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
18.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.47
Avg Place
67.94%
Top 4 Rate
23.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.21
Avg Place
71.43%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.99
Avg Place
82.93%
Top 4 Rate
21.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.63
Avg Place
63.89%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.86%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.46%
Top 4 Rate
18.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.24
Avg Place
52.94%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.79
Avg Place
57.34%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
68.61%
Top 4 Rate
23.36%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
87.50%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.59
Avg Place
68.25%
Top 4 Rate
20.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.61
Avg Place
66.07%
Top 4 Rate
21.43%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.49
Avg Place
67.44%
Top 4 Rate
23.26%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.47
Avg Place
71.88%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Low Contested
2.97
Avg Place
80.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.59
Avg Place
64.43%
Top 4 Rate
27.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.71
Avg Place
62.22%
Top 4 Rate
24.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.98
Avg Place
59.52%
Top 4 Rate
13.10%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.04
Avg Place
54.35%
Top 4 Rate
13.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.56
Avg Place
65.93%
Top 4 Rate
20.88%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.38%
Top 4 Rate
19.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.26
Avg Place
70.37%
Top 4 Rate
20.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.04
Avg Place
75.94%
Top 4 Rate
21.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.85
Avg Place
65.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.98
Avg Place
58.49%
Top 4 Rate
16.60%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.69
Avg Place
64.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.31%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.38
Avg Place
72.73%
Top 4 Rate
22.73%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.19
Avg Place
55.93%
Top 4 Rate
15.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.89%
Top 4 Rate
22.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.53
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
18.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.83
Avg Place
39.66%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.46
Avg Place
68.10%
Top 4 Rate
27.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
15.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.15
Avg Place
53.27%
Top 4 Rate
14.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.65
Avg Place
64.65%
Top 4 Rate
17.32%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.95%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.33
Avg Place
71.05%
Top 4 Rate
14.04%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.60
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.23
Avg Place
29.55%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.81
Avg Place
59.74%
Top 4 Rate
12.99%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.63
Avg Place
59.26%
Top 4 Rate
22.22%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.38
Avg Place
54.17%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.38
Avg Place
45.59%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.54
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.06
Avg Place
58.68%
Top 4 Rate
16.77%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.04
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
12.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.35
Avg Place
55.00%
Top 4 Rate
15.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
54.55%
Top 4 Rate
36.36%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
60.27%
Top 4 Rate
15.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.13
Avg Place
52.08%
Top 4 Rate
14.58%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.40
Avg Place
50.94%
Top 4 Rate
7.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.93
Avg Place
57.94%
Top 4 Rate
15.89%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.31
Avg Place
50.72%
Top 4 Rate
12.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.67
Avg Place
53.85%
Top 4 Rate
2.56%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.97
Avg Place
59.78%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
47.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.84%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.38
Avg Place
50.85%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
48.80%
Top 4 Rate
13.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
33.33%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.06%
Top 4 Rate
22.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.47
Avg Place
50.53%
Top 4 Rate
12.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.68
Avg Place
44.30%
Top 4 Rate
10.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.78
Avg Place
43.84%
Top 4 Rate
6.85%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.78
Avg Place
36.96%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.96
Avg Place
36.97%
Top 4 Rate
11.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.27%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.06
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 88 team compositions sorted by win rate to help you find the strongest compositions for climbing ranked, based on 11.3K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 63.1% and average placement of 3.76 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 97.9% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 88.7% win rate, and Rogue/N.O.V.A. at 88.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Pantheon
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Rogue/Meeple which achieves first place in 36.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 97.9% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 88.7% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rogue/N.O.V.A.: 88.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/Rogue with a 1.3% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 80.7% win rate despite high contestation. Replicator/Dark Star follows at 1.3% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.

Signaler un problème

Compos TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ

Quelle est la meilleure compo TFT Double Up dans TFT Set 17 ?

La meilleure compo TFT Double Up dans TFT Set 17 est N.O.V.A./Brawler avec Viktor comme carry principal, atteignant un taux de victoire de 97.9% et un placement moyen de 2.19. Cette composition est efficace pour monter en rang avec un partenaire.

Comment jouer la compo N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up ?

Pour jouer N.O.V.A./Brawler en Double Up, coordonnez-vous avec votre partenaire. Concentrez-vous sur Viktor comme carry principal. Cette compo a un taux de pick de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement non contestée. Coordonnez les assistances et les objets partagés avec votre partenaire.

Quelles compos Double Up sont bonnes pour monter en TFT Set 17 ?

Pour des gains de LP réguliers en TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler offre le meilleur placement moyen à 2.19. D'autres options fiables incluent Replicator/N.O.V.A. (moy. 2.46) et Dark Star/Brawler (moy. 2.52). Coordonnez-vous avec votre partenaire pour éviter de vous contester.

Quelle est la compo TFT Double Up la plus facile à jouer ?

N.O.V.A./Brawler est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 97.9% mais seulement 0.1% de pick rate, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, rendant le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans forcer les pivots.

Mon partenaire et moi devrions-nous jouer la même compo en Double Up ?

En TFT Set 17 Double Up, il est généralement préférable de jouer des compos différentes pour éviter de contester les unités. Challenger/Rogue est la plus populaire avec 1.3% de taux de pick. Envisagez que votre partenaire joue N.O.V.A./Brawler comme option complémentaire.