Set archivé : Ces compositions proviennent du Set undefined de TFT et ne font plus partie du set actuel. Les statistiques affichées datent de la période active de ce set.

Top Compos TFT par Taux de Première Place

Ce tableau met en avant les compositions TFT Set undefined avec les taux de première place les plus élevés, parfait pour les joueurs cherchant à maximiser leurs chances de victoire. Compositions à 9 champions du Set undefined : N.O.V.A. (91.0% TV, 2.0 moy), Réplicateur (97.0% TV, 1.8 moy), Pulsar sombre (91.5% TV, 2.1 moy). N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine mène avec 91.00% de win rate et 1.98 de placement moyen. Réplicateur suit avec 96.97% de win rate. Analyse de 69 compositions à 9 champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.

Filter by Trait
Filter by Champion
Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
1.98
Avg Place
91.00%
Top 4 Rate
57.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.80
Avg Place
96.97%
Top 4 Rate
54.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
91.52%
Top 4 Rate
46.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
91.30%
Top 4 Rate
44.80%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
92.22%
Top 4 Rate
42.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.37
Avg Place
92.42%
Top 4 Rate
33.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
76.08%
Top 4 Rate
33.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.81
Avg Place
84.04%
Top 4 Rate
32.53%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.26
Avg Place
95.46%
Top 4 Rate
32.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.76
Avg Place
85.47%
Top 4 Rate
31.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.27
Avg Place
93.97%
Top 4 Rate
31.16%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.38
Avg Place
94.26%
Top 4 Rate
29.50%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
92.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.64
Avg Place
62.99%
Top 4 Rate
28.89%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.95
Avg Place
77.73%
Top 4 Rate
27.50%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.84
Avg Place
82.86%
Top 4 Rate
27.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.52
Avg Place
90.38%
Top 4 Rate
26.97%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.99
Avg Place
79.29%
Top 4 Rate
26.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.60%
Top 4 Rate
25.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.22
Avg Place
73.93%
Top 4 Rate
25.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.13
Avg Place
76.66%
Top 4 Rate
25.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.39
Avg Place
92.65%
Top 4 Rate
24.93%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.95%
Top 4 Rate
24.70%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.48
Avg Place
69.26%
Top 4 Rate
23.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
75.80%
Top 4 Rate
23.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.08
Avg Place
77.54%
Top 4 Rate
23.19%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.88
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
21.58%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.26
Avg Place
76.38%
Top 4 Rate
20.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.96
Avg Place
58.72%
Top 4 Rate
20.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.18
Avg Place
79.86%
Top 4 Rate
20.49%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.66
Avg Place
65.12%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.08%
Top 4 Rate
19.48%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.32
Avg Place
73.63%
Top 4 Rate
18.75%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.18
Avg Place
78.25%
Top 4 Rate
18.31%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.34
Avg Place
74.47%
Top 4 Rate
18.24%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
80.65%
Top 4 Rate
18.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
83.60%
Top 4 Rate
18.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.25
Avg Place
73.75%
Top 4 Rate
18.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
57.03%
Top 4 Rate
17.84%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.41
Avg Place
73.89%
Top 4 Rate
17.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.19
Avg Place
81.05%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.32
Avg Place
76.43%
Top 4 Rate
16.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.77
Avg Place
65.31%
Top 4 Rate
16.15%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.29
Avg Place
77.34%
Top 4 Rate
15.71%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
70.03%
Top 4 Rate
14.54%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.29
Avg Place
76.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.22
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
13.81%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.46
Avg Place
73.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.57%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.54
Avg Place
71.12%
Top 4 Rate
13.55%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.13
Avg Place
81.76%
Top 4 Rate
12.79%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.10
Avg Place
81.35%
Top 4 Rate
12.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.25
Avg Place
79.28%
Top 4 Rate
12.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.75
Avg Place
66.95%
Top 4 Rate
11.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.40
Avg Place
78.75%
Top 4 Rate
11.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.67
Avg Place
69.93%
Top 4 Rate
11.15%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.20
Avg Place
53.08%
Top 4 Rate
10.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
71.06%
Top 4 Rate
7.72%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.03
Avg Place
61.02%
Top 4 Rate
6.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.76
Avg Place
44.20%
Top 4 Rate
6.43%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.34
Avg Place
54.48%
Top 4 Rate
6.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.73%
Top 4 Rate
6.06%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.94
Avg Place
64.09%
Top 4 Rate
5.79%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
44.05%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.45
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.17%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.12
Avg Place
36.36%
Top 4 Rate
3.84%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.63
Avg Place
48.61%
Top 4 Rate
3.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.29
Avg Place
33.61%
Top 4 Rate
2.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.01
Avg Place
19.83%
Top 4 Rate
2.20%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.75
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
0.39%
First Place
Severely Contested

TFT Set undefined Meta Analysis

This page displays 69 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 72.8% and average placement of 3.37 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. with Milio as the primary carry, achieving a 97.0% win rate. Following closely is Rebelle/N.O.V.A. at 95.5% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Pulsar sombre at 94.3%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Milio
  • Rebelle/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Twisted Fate
  • N.O.V.A./Pulsar sombre (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Briar

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine which achieves first place in 57.7% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Réplicateur/N.O.V.A.: 97.0% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rebelle/N.O.V.A.: 95.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Pulsar sombre: 94.3% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Meeple/Tisse-destin with a 1.5% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 83.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 0.9% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.

Signaler un problème

FAQ Comps TFT Set undefined

Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set undefined ?

La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set undefined est Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. avec Milio comme carry principal, avec un taux de victoire de 97.0% et un placement moyen de 1.80. Cette composition est efficace pour progresser en classé et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.

Comment jouer la composition Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. ?

Pour jouer Réplicateur/N.O.V.A., concentrez-vous sur Milio comme carry principal. Cherchez Milio et les unités de soutien tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance aux niveaux 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de sélection de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement peu contestée.

Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour progresser dans TFT Set undefined ?

Pour des gains de LP constants dans TFT Set undefined, Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. offre le meilleur placement moyen à 1.80. D'autres options fiables incluent N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine (1.98 avg) et Pulsar sombre/Bagarreur (2.14 avg). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions en bas du classement et permettent une progression stable.

Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?

Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 97.0% mais seulement 0.1% de taux de sélection, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, ce qui rend le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans avoir à forcer des pivots.

Quand dois-je forcer une composition vs flex dans TFT Set undefined ?

Dans TFT Set undefined, Meeple/Tisse-destin a un taux de sélection de 1.5%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la jouer, envisagez de flexer vers des alternatives comme Réplicateur/N.O.V.A.. Forcez une composition quand vous obtenez des unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Flexez quand vous voyez 2+ joueurs en compétition pour les mêmes unités.

Quelle composition TFT gagne le plus souvent les lobbys dans TFT Set undefined ?

N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine atteint la première place dans 57.7% des parties, ce qui en fait la meilleure composition pour gagner les lobbys. Réplicateur/N.O.V.A. follows at 54.5% first place rate. Si votre objectif est de gagner plutôt que juste le top 4, priorisez ces compositions à fort potentiel.

Quand dois-je jouer pour la première place vs le top 4 ?

Jouez pour la première place quand vous avez une composition à fort potentiel comme N.O.V.A./Duelliste divine (57.7% de taux de première place) et que vous atteignez votre pic de puissance avec des objets optimaux. Jouez pour le top 4 quand vous êtes contesté, avez des objets sous-optimaux, ou devez préserver vos LP. En classé, des top 4 réguliers progressent souvent plus vite que de tenter le tout pour le tout pour la première place.