Meilleures Compos TFT par Placement

Ce tableau classe les compositions TFT Set 17 par leur placement moyen, montrant quelles compos atteignent constamment les meilleures positions. Compositions à 8 champions du Set 17 : Duelliste divine (97.5% TV, 2.1 moy), N.O.V.A. (97.4% TV, 2.1 moy), Rebelle (83.6% TV, 2.9 moy). Duelliste divine/Voyageur mène avec 97.53% de win rate et 2.08 de placement moyen. N.O.V.A. suit avec 97.44% de win rate. Analyse de 61 compositions à 8 champions avec statistiques de performance en temps réel.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4FirstContested Risk
2.08
Avg Place
97.53%
Top 4 Rate
36.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.13
Avg Place
97.44%
Top 4 Rate
35.26%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.90
Avg Place
83.61%
Top 4 Rate
27.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.98
Avg Place
79.53%
Top 4 Rate
24.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.00
Avg Place
82.65%
Top 4 Rate
20.41%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.57
Avg Place
70.46%
Top 4 Rate
14.12%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.58
Avg Place
70.05%
Top 4 Rate
13.61%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.82
Avg Place
69.70%
Top 4 Rate
8.71%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.86
Avg Place
64.81%
Top 4 Rate
12.41%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
63.33%
Top 4 Rate
13.33%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.26
Avg Place
53.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.28
Avg Place
55.73%
Top 4 Rate
8.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.40
Avg Place
52.98%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.41
Avg Place
53.44%
Top 4 Rate
4.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.50
Avg Place
50.36%
Top 4 Rate
6.57%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.52
Avg Place
47.71%
Top 4 Rate
6.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
4.60
Avg Place
48.27%
Top 4 Rate
6.44%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.78
Avg Place
46.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.18%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
4.81
Avg Place
41.72%
Top 4 Rate
13.50%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.83
Avg Place
42.92%
Top 4 Rate
7.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.89
Avg Place
41.57%
Top 4 Rate
6.42%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.91
Avg Place
39.18%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.93
Avg Place
39.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.52%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.75%
Top 4 Rate
6.80%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.06
Avg Place
38.41%
Top 4 Rate
1.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.09
Avg Place
37.19%
Top 4 Rate
2.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
-
5.26
Avg Place
30.46%
Top 4 Rate
4.60%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.27
Avg Place
30.25%
Top 4 Rate
4.94%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.36
Avg Place
29.49%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.41
Avg Place
28.65%
Top 4 Rate
0.28%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.43
Avg Place
31.18%
Top 4 Rate
2.69%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.47
Avg Place
28.80%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.50
Avg Place
21.64%
Top 4 Rate
3.73%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.50
Avg Place
25.23%
Top 4 Rate
3.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.62
Avg Place
22.56%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.70
Avg Place
28.82%
Top 4 Rate
2.94%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.74
Avg Place
22.16%
Top 4 Rate
2.23%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.80
Avg Place
22.15%
Top 4 Rate
1.68%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.80
Avg Place
18.72%
Top 4 Rate
0.46%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.82
Avg Place
21.17%
Top 4 Rate
0.90%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.84
Avg Place
19.66%
Top 4 Rate
0.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.85
Avg Place
19.58%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.85
Avg Place
25.07%
Top 4 Rate
4.27%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.82%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.92
Avg Place
19.41%
Top 4 Rate
2.13%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.94
Avg Place
22.67%
Top 4 Rate
1.74%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.98
Avg Place
15.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.00
Avg Place
21.74%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.04
Avg Place
18.43%
Top 4 Rate
1.44%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.09
Avg Place
6.99%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.12
Avg Place
14.66%
Top 4 Rate
1.72%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.12
Avg Place
19.28%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.12
Avg Place
13.81%
Top 4 Rate
0.62%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.13
Avg Place
16.78%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.13
Avg Place
16.61%
Top 4 Rate
1.28%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.18
Avg Place
14.46%
Top 4 Rate
2.07%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.27
Avg Place
13.29%
Top 4 Rate
0.63%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.27
Avg Place
13.98%
Top 4 Rate
0.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.44
Avg Place
13.92%
Top 4 Rate
5.06%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.49
Avg Place
10.14%
Top 4 Rate
1.45%
First Place
Highly Contested
6.66
Avg Place
9.22%
Top 4 Rate
0.92%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 61 team compositions sorted by average placement to find the most consistent compositions for reliable top 4 finishes, based on 30.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 36.3% and average placement of 5.13 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Duelliste divine/Voyageur with Aurelion Sol as the primary carry, achieving a 97.5% win rate. Following closely is N.O.V.A./Voyageur at 97.4% win rate, and Rebelle/Meeple at 83.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Duelliste divine/Voyageur (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Aurelion Sol
  • N.O.V.A./Voyageur (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Urgot
  • Rebelle/Meeple (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Fizz

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Duelliste divine/Voyageur: 97.5% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Voyageur: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Rebelle/Meeple: 83.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Challenger/N.O.V.A. with a 2.0% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 53.4% win rate despite high contestation. Pulsar sombre/Voyageur follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.

Signaler un problème

FAQ Comps TFT Set 17

Quelle est la meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 ?

La meilleure composition TFT dans TFT Set 17 est Duelliste divine/Voyageur avec Aurelion Sol comme carry principal, avec un taux de victoire de 97.5% et un placement moyen de 2.08. Cette composition est efficace pour progresser en classé et se place régulièrement dans le top 4.

Comment jouer la composition Duelliste divine/Voyageur ?

Pour jouer Duelliste divine/Voyageur, concentrez-vous sur Aurelion Sol comme carry principal. Cherchez Aurelion Sol et les unités de soutien tôt, priorisez les objets qui synergisent avec votre carry, et visez votre pic de puissance aux niveaux 7-8. Cette composition a un taux de sélection de 0.1%, ce qui en fait une option relativement peu contestée.

Quelles compositions sont bonnes pour progresser dans TFT Set 17 ?

Pour des gains de LP constants dans TFT Set 17, Duelliste divine/Voyageur offre le meilleur placement moyen à 2.08. D'autres options fiables incluent N.O.V.A./Voyageur (2.13 avg) et Rebelle/Meeple (2.90 avg). Les compositions régulières minimisent les finitions en bas du classement et permettent une progression stable.

Quelle est la composition TFT la plus facile à jouer ?

Duelliste divine/Voyageur est une excellente option pour les joueurs cherchant une montée plus facile. Avec un taux de victoire de 97.5% mais seulement 0.1% de taux de sélection, vous êtes peu susceptible d'être contesté, ce qui rend le jeu plus facile à naviguer. Une faible contestation signifie que vous pouvez naturellement trouver vos unités sans avoir à forcer des pivots.

Quand dois-je forcer une composition vs flex dans TFT Set 17 ?

Dans TFT Set 17, Challenger/N.O.V.A. a un taux de sélection de 2.0%, ce qui signifie qu'elle est très contestée. Si vous voyez d'autres joueurs la jouer, envisagez de flexer vers des alternatives comme Duelliste divine/Voyageur. Forcez une composition quand vous obtenez des unités et objets tôt, ou quand elle n'est pas contestée. Flexez quand vous voyez 2+ joueurs en compétition pour les mêmes unités.

Quelle est la composition TFT la plus régulière dans TFT Set 17 ?

Duelliste divine/Voyageur a le meilleur placement moyen à 2.08, ce qui en fait la composition la plus régulière pour progresser. N.O.V.A./Voyageur follows at 2.13, et Rebelle/Meeple at 2.90. Un placement moyen plus bas signifie moins de finitions en bas du classement.

Le placement moyen est-il meilleur que le taux de victoire pour progresser ?

Pour des gains de LP constants, le placement moyen est souvent plus fiable que le pur taux de victoire. Une composition comme Duelliste divine/Voyageur avec un placement moyen de 2.08 minimise les grosses pertes de LP des finitions en bas du classement. Les compositions à haute variance peuvent gagner plus de lobbys mais aussi finir 8ème plus souvent. Pour progresser, la régularité bat généralement les stratégies risquées.