Couteau Incandescentvs Cotte de mailles
Couteau Incandescent a l'avantage contre Cotte De Mailles, gagnant 57.1% de leurs rencontres basé sur 35 matchs analysés. Couteau Incandescent met la pression sur Cotte De Mailles dans la backline, mais les 9,348 soins de Cotte De Mailles maintiennent les alliés en combat plus longtemps. En jouant Couteau Incandescent contre Cotte De Mailles, profitez de votre avantage tôt et capitalisez sur votre production de dégâts supérieur.
Couteau Incandescent Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for Couteau Incandescent. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
Cotte De Mailles(57.1%)
Who Wins the Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte De Mailles Matchup?
Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte De Mailles Matchup Analysis
The Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte De Mailles matchup is decisively one-sided based on 35 match sample. Couteau Incandescent dominates with a 57.1% win rate while Cotte De Mailles manages only 42.9%, a commanding 14.3% advantage. This represents one of the more lopsided hero matchups in Marvel Rivals, and players should strongly consider team composition when facing this scenario. Couteau Incandescent can threaten Cotte De Mailles with dive pressure, disrupting healing output and creating chaos in the backline. Cotte De Mailles absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 7.81, a massive +4.17 advantage over Couteau Incandescent. This indicates Cotte De Mailles consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. The largest difference appears in healing numbers, with Cotte De Mailles providing 8,453 more healing per match. This sustain advantage often determines which team wins prolonged engagements. When playing Couteau Incandescent into Cotte De Mailles, you can play aggressively with confidence. Your 57.1% win rate in this matchup means the statistics strongly favor you in direct engagements. Look to force fights and capitalize on your advantage. As a Vanguard, Couteau Incandescent's performance against Cotte De Mailles depends on your team following up on engagements. Coordinate your dives and ensure backline support before committing.
Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte De Mailles Combat Statistics
Cotte De Mailles holds a clear combat advantage over Couteau Incandescent, winning 3 of 4 statistical categories (KDA, Deaths and Assists). This indicates a meaningful performance gap in direct confrontations.
Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte De Mailles Impact Comparison
Couteau Incandescent6,058Cotte De Mailles5,703Couteau Incandescent895Cotte De Mailles9,348Despite being a Vanguard, Couteau Incandescent deals impressive damage averaging 6,058 per match. This unexpected damage output makes Couteau Incandescent a threat that Cotte De Mailles cannot ignore.
As a Strategist, Cotte De Mailles contributes 9,348 average healing per match, sustaining their team through Couteau Incandescent's pressure and enabling extended team fights.
Vanguard vs Strategist Role Matchup
Couteau Incandescent pressures Cotte De Mailles effectively with a 57.1% win rate. Your dive potential threatens the backline and your durability absorbs poke. Coordinate with your team to collapse when you engage.
Données complètes d'affrontement pour Couteau Incandescent dans Marvel Rivals (saison Season 2). Parcourez tous les affrontements de héros triés par taux de victoire, filtrez par rôle ou recherchez des adversaires spécifiques.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62.3% | 199 | 4.17 | 18.2 | 6.0 | 4,864 | 134 | |
| 58.5% | 135 | 3.78 | 18.1 | 6.4 | 5,057 | 28 | |
| 51.5% | 134 | 3.69 | 17.2 | 6.5 | 4,194 | 45 | |
| 52.7% | 131 | 3.71 | 17.5 | 6.5 | 5,939 | 271 | |
| 55.7% | 106 | 3.85 | 17.6 | 6.4 | 4,469 | 139 | |
| 36.3% | 102 | 3.61 | 17.9 | 6.6 | 10,021 | 763 | |
| 59.4% | 96 | 3.94 | 18.0 | 6.3 | 4,324 | 48 | |
| 50.5% | 95 | 3.81 | 17.6 | 6.1 | 5,377 | 63 | |
| 42.9% | 91 | 3.81 | 17.1 | 6.2 | 5,394 | 391 | |
| 43.8% | 89 | 3.34 | 18.4 | 7.2 | 11,239 | 434 | |
| 54.0% | 87 | 3.21 | 16.3 | 6.9 | 4,833 | 72 | |
| 47.5% | 80 | 3.85 | 17.9 | 6.5 | 6,252 | 454 | |
| 60.0% | 75 | 4.04 | 19.4 | 6.5 | 5,445 | 197 | |
| 60.3% | 73 | 4.09 | 18.3 | 6.0 | 5,144 | 32 | |
| 58.0% | 69 | 4.50 | 18.6 | 5.8 | 6,040 | 120 | |
| 56.9% | 65 | 4.03 | 19.1 | 6.5 | 6,463 | 204 | |
| 54.1% | 61 | 4.30 | 18.8 | 5.9 | 5,281 | 155 | |
| 44.6% | 56 | 3.53 | 17.9 | 6.8 | 11,429 | 1,413 | |
| 45.5% | 55 | 3.84 | 18.8 | 6.5 | 5,330 | 26 | |
| 63.0% | 54 | 4.27 | 17.5 | 5.8 | 4,981 | 345 | |
| 42.6% | 54 | 3.92 | 18.6 | 6.4 | 9,427 | 414 | |
| 50.0% | 50 | 4.16 | 18.3 | 6.0 | 4,406 | 13 | |
| 53.2% | 47 | 4.05 | 17.9 | 6.3 | 4,571 | 36 | |
| 58.7% | 46 | 4.43 | 19.5 | 6.0 | 7,300 | 419 | |
| 51.1% | 45 | 4.35 | 18.4 | 5.6 | 4,432 | 19 | |
| 46.7% | 45 | 3.51 | 18.5 | 7.0 | 8,415 | 30 | |
| 47.7% | 44 | 3.59 | 18.1 | 6.8 | 8,774 | 64 | |
| 67.4% | 43 | 4.31 | 18.8 | 5.9 | 5,952 | 425 | |
| 38.1% | 42 | 3.01 | 17.9 | 7.8 | 11,754 | 168 | |
| 46.3% | 41 | 3.70 | 17.1 | 6.3 | 5,888 | 0 | |
| 70.0% | 40 | 3.61 | 17.9 | 6.7 | 4,590 | 6 | |
| 43.6% | 39 | 4.04 | 18.7 | 6.4 | 8,218 | 60 | |
| 42.1% | 38 | 4.29 | 19.1 | 5.8 | 5,388 | 0 | |
| 57.1% | 35 | 3.64 | 16.1 | 6.2 | 6,058 | 895 | |
| 42.9% | 35 | 4.36 | 19.1 | 5.9 | 8,093 | 616 | |
| 72.7% | 33 | 4.65 | 20.5 | 5.9 | 4,733 | 0 | |
| 63.0% | 27 | 4.32 | 19.1 | 5.7 | 10,676 | 469 | |
| 42.3% | 26 | 3.58 | 18.7 | 6.8 | 10,532 | 127 | |
| 64.0% | 25 | 3.98 | 17.4 | 5.6 | 5,304 | 40 | |
| 72.0% | 25 | 4.65 | 19.4 | 5.8 | 4,296 | 59 | |
| 62.5% | 24 | 4.08 | 18.5 | 6.4 | 5,473 | 27 | |
| 65.2% | 23 | 4.80 | 18.8 | 5.1 | 9,095 | 0 | |
| 68.4% | 19 | 4.01 | 19.5 | 6.5 | 7,802 | 0 | |
| 76.9% | 13 | 4.96 | 19.9 | 5.6 | 5,043 | 0 | |
| 57.1% | 7 | 3.89 | 20.0 | 6.7 | 8,882 | 0 | |
| 71.4% | 7 | 6.23 | 23.3 | 5.0 | 7,399 | 0 |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
FAQ Couteau Incandescent vs Cotte de mailles
Quels sont les meilleurs affrontements de Couteau Incandescent dans Marvel Rivals ?
Couteau Incandescent performe le mieux contre elsa bloodstone, Hero 10572, moon knight. L'affrontement le plus fort est contre Ceinture du géant avec un taux de victoire de 76.9%.
Quels sont les pires affrontements de Couteau Incandescent dans Marvel Rivals ?
Couteau Incandescent a du mal contre invisible woman, Bouclier de Doran, cloak & dagger. Le contre le plus difficile est invisible woman avec seulement un taux de victoire de 36.3%.
Comment gagner plus d'affrontements avec Couteau Incandescent ?
En tant que Vanguard, Couteau Incandescent gagne 33 affrontements sur 49 (>50% taux de victoire). Concentrez-vous sur cibler les affrontements favorables et travaillez avec votre équipe pour gérer les adversaires difficiles.
Comment Couteau Incandescent performe-t-il contre différents rôles ?
En tant que Vanguard, la performance d'affrontement de Couteau Incandescent varie selon le rôle de l'adversaire. Utilisez les filtres de rôle dans le tableau ci-dessus pour comparer les taux de victoire contre les Duellistes, Avant-gardes et Stratèges.