White Foxvs cloak & dagger
L'affrontement White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger est très serré, avec White Fox obtenant un taux de victoire de 48.0% sur 25 parties. Le duel de supports revient à Cloak & Dagger—Cloak & Dagger fournit 10,544 soins contre 9,256 pour White Fox, déterminant souvent quelle équipe tient le plus longtemps. Dans cet affrontement équilibré, les joueurs de White Fox devraient se concentrer sur la coordination d'équipe et le timing des capacités pour un impact maximum contre Cloak & Dagger.
White Fox Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for White Fox. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
Cloak & Dagger(48.0%)
Who Wins the White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Matchup?
White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Matchup Analysis
In the White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger matchup, we see a meaningful advantage emerge from 25 matches of data. Cloak & Dagger wins 52.0% of confrontations against White Fox's 48.0%, a 4.0% gap that indicates a noticeable skill-independent advantage. Players should consider this matchup differential when drafting or engaging. As a Strategist mirror matchup between White Fox and Cloak & Dagger, this comes down to mechanical skill and ability usage timing. Cloak & Dagger has proven slightly more effective in these head-to-head encounters. White Fox absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 12.39, a massive +1.65 advantage over Cloak & Dagger. This indicates White Fox consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. The most significant statistical disparity is in damage output, where White Fox averages 2,034 more damage per match, translating to faster eliminations and more team fight presence. White Fox is slightly unfavored against Cloak & Dagger. While not a hard counter, you should play more cautiously, look for favorable trades, and lean on team support when possible. As a Strategist, White Fox's matchup against Cloak & Dagger is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Combat Statistics
White Fox holds a clear combat advantage over Cloak & Dagger, winning 3 of 4 statistical categories (KDA, Kills and Deaths). This indicates a meaningful performance gap in direct confrontations.
White Fox vs Cloak & Dagger Impact Comparison
White Fox5,503Cloak & Dagger3,469White Fox9,256Cloak & Dagger10,544Interestingly, Strategist White Fox leads damage with 5,503 average, suggesting strong offensive capabilities or sustained poke patterns against Cloak & Dagger.
In this Strategist matchup, Cloak & Dagger significantly outpaces White Fox with 1,288 more healing per match. This sustain advantage allows Cloak & Dagger's team to win attrition fights and extended engagements.
Strategist vs Strategist Role Matchup
In this Strategist mirror matchup, Cloak & Dagger has demonstrated a 52.0% win rate advantage. Mirror matchups are the purest test of hero mastery - success comes down to ability timing, positioning, and understanding your hero's specific strengths. Study Cloak & Dagger's common patterns to improve your mirror match performance.
Données complètes d'affrontement pour White Fox dans Marvel Rivals (saison Season 2). Parcourez tous les affrontements de héros triés par taux de victoire, filtrez par rôle ou recherchez des adversaires spécifiques.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48.6% | 72 | 11.69 | 21.4 | 4.9 | 4,730 | 8,776 | |
| 50.0% | 66 | 10.53 | 21.1 | 5.0 | 4,876 | 8,465 | |
| 32.3% | 62 | 9.14 | 19.3 | 6.0 | 4,580 | 7,965 | |
| 44.0% | 50 | 11.51 | 20.8 | 4.6 | 4,766 | 7,740 | |
| 36.0% | 50 | 10.61 | 21.5 | 5.3 | 4,804 | 8,938 | |
| 46.9% | 49 | 9.79 | 19.7 | 5.3 | 4,591 | 7,890 | |
| 51.0% | 49 | 11.95 | 22.2 | 4.9 | 4,847 | 8,731 | |
| 29.8% | 47 | 11.49 | 21.6 | 4.9 | 5,317 | 9,126 | |
| 30.4% | 46 | 10.71 | 22.7 | 5.5 | 5,248 | 9,598 | |
| 57.1% | 42 | 11.02 | 23.7 | 5.9 | 5,626 | 9,991 | |
| 33.3% | 42 | 8.92 | 20.9 | 6.0 | 4,854 | 8,556 | |
| 59.0% | 39 | 11.13 | 21.1 | 5.0 | 4,591 | 8,903 | |
| 28.9% | 38 | 10.95 | 22.8 | 5.6 | 5,290 | 8,991 | |
| 51.4% | 35 | 10.70 | 23.5 | 5.7 | 4,793 | 8,811 | |
| 38.2% | 34 | 12.08 | 24.5 | 5.2 | 6,270 | 10,293 | |
| 45.2% | 31 | 11.46 | 20.8 | 4.6 | 4,773 | 7,858 | |
| 48.4% | 31 | 9.68 | 21.8 | 5.8 | 4,743 | 8,109 | |
| 39.3% | 28 | 10.71 | 23.3 | 5.4 | 4,982 | 8,291 | |
| 25.9% | 27 | 11.37 | 21.5 | 5.0 | 5,720 | 10,198 | |
| 51.8% | 27 | 14.07 | 22.9 | 4.0 | 5,725 | 9,329 | |
| 30.8% | 26 | 9.37 | 18.9 | 5.9 | 4,672 | 8,588 | |
| 48.0% | 25 | 12.39 | 24.2 | 5.0 | 5,503 | 9,256 | |
| 41.7% | 24 | 12.01 | 26.6 | 5.7 | 6,167 | 9,418 | |
| 60.9% | 23 | 11.97 | 23.8 | 5.1 | 4,813 | 9,615 | |
| 43.5% | 23 | 11.80 | 23.4 | 5.2 | 5,573 | 8,758 | |
| 59.1% | 22 | 11.27 | 23.3 | 5.3 | 5,235 | 9,424 | |
| 27.3% | 22 | 10.08 | 18.4 | 5.1 | 3,982 | 7,759 | |
| 45.5% | 22 | 10.08 | 22.0 | 6.1 | 5,783 | 10,278 | |
| 42.9% | 21 | 8.95 | 20.9 | 6.2 | 4,872 | 8,646 | |
| 55.0% | 20 | 12.14 | 24.5 | 5.3 | 6,074 | 10,071 | |
| 50.0% | 20 | 10.10 | 20.8 | 5.3 | 4,655 | 7,691 | |
| 47.4% | 19 | 10.42 | 20.3 | 5.6 | 3,832 | 8,098 | |
| 38.9% | 18 | 8.47 | 18.6 | 5.7 | 4,414 | 6,763 | |
| 61.1% | 18 | 13.72 | 26.7 | 4.8 | 5,164 | 8,822 | |
| 41.2% | 17 | 10.89 | 24.6 | 5.8 | 4,810 | 8,552 | |
| 52.9% | 17 | 10.54 | 20.4 | 5.1 | 3,785 | 8,639 | |
| 43.8% | 16 | 8.12 | 16.9 | 6.1 | 4,096 | 8,490 | |
| 50.0% | 16 | 9.85 | 20.8 | 5.8 | 5,087 | 9,055 | |
| 33.3% | 15 | 9.18 | 22.9 | 6.6 | 5,103 | 8,666 | |
| 42.9% | 14 | 12.11 | 23.9 | 5.1 | 5,280 | 8,328 | |
| 61.5% | 13 | 13.01 | 25.6 | 5.2 | 5,811 | 10,103 | |
| 54.5% | 11 | 11.63 | 23.2 | 5.2 | 5,145 | 9,249 | |
| 40.0% | 10 | 7.46 | 14.4 | 6.1 | 3,661 | 6,641 | |
| 12.5% | 8 | 13.50 | 27.4 | 5.0 | 6,695 | 9,729 | |
| 0.0% | 7 | 10.74 | 19.4 | 5.0 | 3,419 | 9,170 | |
| 42.9% | 7 | 10.02 | 20.9 | 6.1 | 3,856 | 8,461 | |
| 50.0% | 6 | 9.29 | 24.5 | 6.3 | 4,934 | 8,590 |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
FAQ White Fox vs cloak & dagger
Quels sont les meilleurs affrontements de White Fox dans Marvel Rivals ?
White Fox performe le mieux contre iron man, Lame de Doran, Devil Dinosaur. L'affrontement le plus fort est contre Ceinture du géant avec un taux de victoire de 61.5%.
Quels sont les pires affrontements de White Fox dans Marvel Rivals ?
White Fox a du mal contre moon knight, storm, Bouclier de Doran. Le contre le plus difficile est hawkeye avec seulement un taux de victoire de 42.9%.
Comment gagner plus d'affrontements avec White Fox ?
En tant que Strategist, White Fox gagne 16 affrontements sur 50 (>50% taux de victoire). Concentrez-vous sur cibler les affrontements favorables et travaillez avec votre équipe pour gérer les adversaires difficiles.
Comment White Fox performe-t-il contre différents rôles ?
En tant que Strategist, la performance d'affrontement de White Fox varie selon le rôle de l'adversaire. Utilisez les filtres de rôle dans le tableau ci-dessus pour comparer les taux de victoire contre les Duellistes, Avant-gardes et Stratèges.