Cloak & Daggervs White Fox
L'affrontement Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox est très serré, avec Cloak & Dagger obtenant un taux de victoire de 52.0% sur 25 parties. Le duel de supports revient à Cloak & Dagger—Cloak & Dagger fournit 10,544 soins contre 9,256 pour White Fox, déterminant souvent quelle équipe tient le plus longtemps. Dans cet affrontement équilibré, les joueurs de Cloak & Dagger devraient se concentrer sur la coordination d'équipe et le timing des capacités pour un impact maximum contre White Fox.
Cloak & Dagger Matchup Breakdown
Select an opponent from the dropdown to see detailed matchup statistics for Cloak & Dagger. Compare win rates, KDA, damage dealt, and more to understand each head-to-head matchup.
White Fox(52.0%)
Who Wins the Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Matchup?
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Matchup Analysis
In the Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox matchup, we see a meaningful advantage emerge from 25 matches of data. Cloak & Dagger wins 52.0% of confrontations against White Fox's 48.0%, a 4.0% gap that indicates a noticeable skill-independent advantage. Players should consider this matchup differential when drafting or engaging. As a Strategist mirror matchup between Cloak & Dagger and White Fox, this comes down to mechanical skill and ability usage timing. Cloak & Dagger has proven slightly more effective in these head-to-head encounters. White Fox absolutely dominates the KDA statistics with 12.39, a massive +1.65 advantage over Cloak & Dagger. This indicates White Fox consistently outperforms in kill participation while maintaining superior survival rates. The most significant statistical disparity is in damage output, where White Fox averages 2,034 more damage per match, translating to faster eliminations and more team fight presence. Cloak & Dagger has a slight edge against White Fox. While the statistics favor you marginally, focus on fundamentals and don't take unnecessary risks. Small advantages compound over time. As a Strategist, Cloak & Dagger's matchup against White Fox is heavily influenced by team protection. Stay positioned near allies who can peel, and communicate when you're being pressured.
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Combat Statistics
White Fox holds a clear combat advantage over Cloak & Dagger, winning 3 of 4 statistical categories (KDA, Kills and Deaths). This indicates a meaningful performance gap in direct confrontations.
Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox Impact Comparison
Cloak & Dagger3,469White Fox5,503Cloak & Dagger10,544White Fox9,256Interestingly, Strategist White Fox leads damage with 5,503 average, suggesting strong offensive capabilities or sustained poke patterns against Cloak & Dagger.
In this Strategist matchup, Cloak & Dagger significantly outpaces White Fox with 1,288 more healing per match. This sustain advantage allows Cloak & Dagger's team to win attrition fights and extended engagements.
Strategist vs Strategist Role Matchup
In this Strategist mirror matchup, Cloak & Dagger has demonstrated a 52.0% win rate advantage. Mirror matchups are the purest test of hero mastery - success comes down to ability timing, positioning, and understanding your hero's specific strengths. Study Cloak & Dagger's common patterns to improve your mirror match performance.
Données complètes d'affrontement pour Cloak & Dagger dans Marvel Rivals (saison Season 2). Parcourez tous les affrontements de héros triés par taux de victoire, filtrez par rôle ou recherchez des adversaires spécifiques.
Opponent | Win Rate | Matches | KDA | Kills | Deaths | Damage | Healing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.1% | 281 | 14.89 | 19.0 | 4.0 | 4,263 | 13,294 | |
| 50.9% | 230 | 8.78 | 16.5 | 5.5 | 6,968 | 22,362 | |
| 54.0% | 198 | 11.97 | 17.9 | 4.9 | 4,337 | 13,312 | |
| 54.6% | 194 | 14.82 | 18.2 | 4.1 | 4,087 | 14,540 | |
| 47.1% | 191 | 12.51 | 18.8 | 4.6 | 4,779 | 14,277 | |
| 50.8% | 189 | 13.86 | 19.2 | 4.6 | 3,434 | 10,661 | |
| 53.0% | 164 | 12.35 | 18.0 | 4.8 | 4,895 | 16,397 | |
| 55.3% | 152 | 14.31 | 18.1 | 4.2 | 3,902 | 12,792 | |
| 56.7% | 141 | 7.82 | 16.9 | 6.2 | 8,074 | 24,723 | |
| 47.1% | 138 | 12.84 | 19.4 | 4.8 | 4,701 | 13,633 | |
| 49.6% | 127 | 16.05 | 20.2 | 4.2 | 4,111 | 12,190 | |
| 52.6% | 116 | 11.80 | 18.7 | 4.9 | 5,630 | 16,801 | |
| 61.3% | 111 | 12.33 | 18.8 | 4.9 | 4,715 | 14,967 | |
| 57.9% | 107 | 15.50 | 19.6 | 4.1 | 3,979 | 12,028 | |
| 58.5% | 106 | 12.03 | 17.2 | 4.6 | 5,049 | 18,217 | |
| 65.1% | 106 | 12.19 | 18.3 | 4.8 | 4,986 | 15,874 | |
| 44.2% | 104 | 8.54 | 15.7 | 5.8 | 6,403 | 25,463 | |
| 54.8% | 104 | 11.85 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 6,770 | 17,607 | |
| 45.1% | 102 | 13.33 | 19.1 | 4.7 | 3,946 | 11,576 | |
| 62.9% | 97 | 10.44 | 16.4 | 4.9 | 5,610 | 18,076 | |
| 61.9% | 97 | 10.04 | 17.9 | 5.5 | 6,721 | 22,729 | |
| 58.1% | 93 | 10.99 | 18.5 | 5.0 | 4,654 | 16,558 | |
| 47.2% | 89 | 9.52 | 17.5 | 5.8 | 6,931 | 25,821 | |
| 50.6% | 85 | 10.69 | 18.0 | 5.2 | 4,299 | 12,552 | |
| 61.1% | 72 | 10.82 | 18.8 | 5.2 | 7,071 | 20,566 | |
| 43.7% | 71 | 11.06 | 17.1 | 5.1 | 3,864 | 12,632 | |
| 44.3% | 70 | 10.94 | 18.5 | 5.1 | 4,694 | 14,013 | |
| 54.4% | 68 | 10.75 | 18.3 | 5.3 | 5,630 | 18,927 | |
| 50.0% | 68 | 13.90 | 20.0 | 4.4 | 3,422 | 9,425 | |
| 45.5% | 66 | 12.64 | 17.5 | 4.5 | 4,647 | 13,952 | |
| 60.0% | 65 | 11.90 | 20.2 | 5.2 | 5,574 | 17,034 | |
| 51.6% | 62 | 9.15 | 18.1 | 5.7 | 7,001 | 20,813 | |
| 65.0% | 60 | 14.65 | 18.5 | 4.2 | 3,846 | 13,994 | |
| 47.5% | 59 | 12.54 | 19.5 | 4.8 | 4,425 | 11,524 | |
| 57.4% | 54 | 12.13 | 18.2 | 4.5 | 4,678 | 11,426 | |
| 50.9% | 53 | 13.65 | 19.9 | 4.5 | 6,665 | 18,943 | |
| 51.0% | 51 | 7.69 | 14.8 | 5.9 | 6,125 | 21,842 | |
| 58.0% | 50 | 11.28 | 18.4 | 5.2 | 5,573 | 15,297 | |
| 42.0% | 50 | 11.72 | 18.8 | 5.1 | 5,110 | 15,983 | |
| 52.3% | 44 | 8.12 | 14.7 | 5.4 | 5,846 | 18,236 | |
| 69.8% | 43 | 15.98 | 21.5 | 4.4 | 3,928 | 11,452 | |
| 59.5% | 42 | 17.55 | 18.8 | 3.7 | 4,410 | 14,455 | |
| 51.3% | 39 | 11.87 | 18.3 | 4.9 | 4,026 | 14,244 | |
| 54.0% | 37 | 10.25 | 20.1 | 5.8 | 6,247 | 19,650 | |
| 38.9% | 36 | 9.49 | 17.3 | 5.9 | 3,162 | 9,390 | |
| 55.6% | 27 | 13.56 | 18.9 | 4.3 | 5,891 | 18,628 | |
| 52.0% | 25 | 10.74 | 20.5 | 6.0 | 3,469 | 10,544 | |
| 52.0% | 25 | 10.73 | 20.7 | 5.8 | 4,390 | 10,891 | |
| 73.9% | 23 | 17.13 | 18.6 | 3.7 | 4,116 | 15,501 |
Aidez-nous à maintenir la précision ! Si vous remarquez des statistiques incorrectes, des données manquantes ou d'autres problèmes, vos retours nous aident à améliorer la qualité de nos données pour toute la communauté.
FAQ Cloak & Dagger vs White Fox
Quels sont les meilleurs affrontements de Cloak & Dagger dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cloak & Dagger performe le mieux contre Elsa Bloodstone, Hero 10572, invisible woman. L'affrontement le plus fort est contre Cape de néant avec un taux de victoire de 73.9%.
Quels sont les pires affrontements de Cloak & Dagger dans Marvel Rivals ?
Cloak & Dagger a du mal contre jeff the land shark, Baguette trop grosse, squirrel girl. Le contre le plus difficile est Black Cat avec seulement un taux de victoire de 38.9%.
Comment gagner plus d'affrontements avec Cloak & Dagger ?
En tant que Strategist, Cloak & Dagger gagne 39 affrontements sur 52 (>50% taux de victoire). Concentrez-vous sur cibler les affrontements favorables et travaillez avec votre équipe pour gérer les adversaires difficiles.
Comment Cloak & Dagger performe-t-il contre différents rôles ?
En tant que Strategist, la performance d'affrontement de Cloak & Dagger varie selon le rôle de l'adversaire. Utilisez les filtres de rôle dans le tableau ci-dessus pour comparer les taux de victoire contre les Duellistes, Avant-gardes et Stratèges.