Składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższym wskaźnikiem wygranych

Ta tabela prezentuje składy drużynowe TFT z najwyższymi wskaźnikami wygranych, pomagając zidentyfikować najbardziej udane składy do wspinania się w rankingu. Top 9-bohaterowe kompozycje Setu 17: Pretendenci (97.4% WR, 2.2 avg), Zbiry (96.4% WR, 2.1 avg), Zbiry (95.9% WR, 2.1 avg). Pretendenci/Zbiry prowadzi z 97.42% win rate i 2.25 średnią pozycją. Zbiry podąża z 96.39% win rate. Analiza 62 9-bohaterowych kompozycji ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
2.25
Avg Place
97.42%
Top 4 Rate
31.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.06
Avg Place
96.39%
Top 4 Rate
39.25%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.08
Avg Place
95.88%
Top 4 Rate
37.05%
First Place
Moderately Contested
2.17
Avg Place
95.67%
Top 4 Rate
34.66%
First Place
Moderately Contested
1.99
Avg Place
94.82%
Top 4 Rate
42.42%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.14
Avg Place
94.75%
Top 4 Rate
37.37%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.20
Avg Place
94.07%
Top 4 Rate
37.29%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.43
Avg Place
92.56%
Top 4 Rate
29.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.36
Avg Place
92.29%
Top 4 Rate
30.35%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.41
Avg Place
91.99%
Top 4 Rate
30.04%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.55
Avg Place
89.66%
Top 4 Rate
26.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.32
Avg Place
89.49%
Top 4 Rate
39.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.47
Avg Place
88.33%
Top 4 Rate
28.02%
First Place
Severely Contested
2.40
Avg Place
87.58%
Top 4 Rate
40.35%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.44
Avg Place
87.13%
Top 4 Rate
39.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.73
Avg Place
86.01%
Top 4 Rate
27.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.71
Avg Place
85.26%
Top 4 Rate
30.52%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.97
Avg Place
83.85%
Top 4 Rate
25.77%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.84
Avg Place
83.06%
Top 4 Rate
28.72%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
81.98%
Top 4 Rate
16.47%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.11
Avg Place
81.06%
Top 4 Rate
17.41%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.14
Avg Place
80.24%
Top 4 Rate
18.76%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.82
Avg Place
80.15%
Top 4 Rate
37.13%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.03
Avg Place
79.64%
Top 4 Rate
23.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
79.45%
Top 4 Rate
25.12%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.13
Avg Place
79.36%
Top 4 Rate
18.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
2.91
Avg Place
78.77%
Top 4 Rate
29.16%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.16
Avg Place
78.50%
Top 4 Rate
20.56%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.10
Avg Place
78.42%
Top 4 Rate
21.98%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.05
Avg Place
77.94%
Top 4 Rate
26.83%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.10
Avg Place
77.78%
Top 4 Rate
27.53%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.01
Avg Place
77.15%
Top 4 Rate
25.22%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.37
Avg Place
75.92%
Top 4 Rate
16.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
75.51%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.39
Avg Place
74.82%
Top 4 Rate
19.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.23
Avg Place
74.27%
Top 4 Rate
23.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.30
Avg Place
74.25%
Top 4 Rate
19.77%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.49
Avg Place
71.84%
Top 4 Rate
16.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.56
Avg Place
70.89%
Top 4 Rate
14.41%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.50
Avg Place
69.83%
Top 4 Rate
19.63%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.45
Avg Place
68.14%
Top 4 Rate
23.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.55
Avg Place
67.92%
Top 4 Rate
20.82%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.38%
Top 4 Rate
17.91%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.66
Avg Place
67.14%
Top 4 Rate
16.30%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.74
Avg Place
66.70%
Top 4 Rate
11.92%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.83
Avg Place
66.60%
Top 4 Rate
16.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.70
Avg Place
66.30%
Top 4 Rate
20.65%
First Place
Low Contested
3.93
Avg Place
65.47%
Top 4 Rate
7.82%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.74
Avg Place
64.80%
Top 4 Rate
17.51%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.95
Avg Place
63.45%
Top 4 Rate
6.99%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.07
Avg Place
59.35%
Top 4 Rate
7.61%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.90
Avg Place
59.24%
Top 4 Rate
20.93%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.32
Avg Place
56.96%
Top 4 Rate
6.03%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.26
Avg Place
56.43%
Top 4 Rate
4.97%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.32
Avg Place
55.03%
Top 4 Rate
8.52%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
54.22%
Top 4 Rate
3.21%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.43
Avg Place
51.97%
Top 4 Rate
5.34%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.43
Avg Place
49.82%
Top 4 Rate
5.78%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.60
Avg Place
49.74%
Top 4 Rate
3.95%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.86
Avg Place
43.02%
Top 4 Rate
3.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.85
Avg Place
42.51%
Top 4 Rate
7.58%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.97
Avg Place
41.14%
Top 4 Rate
6.69%
First Place
Moderately Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 62 team compositions ranked by performance to help you make informed decisions, based on 67.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 74.6% and average placement of 3.27 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is Pretendenci/Zbiry with Kai'Sa as the primary carry, achieving a 97.4% win rate. Following closely is Zbiry/N.O.V.A. at 96.4% win rate, and Zbiry/N.O.V.A. at 95.9%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • Pretendenci/Zbiry (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Kai'Sa
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider Zbiry/N.O.V.A. which achieves first place in 42.4% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Most Consistent for Climbing

For players focused on consistent LP gains, Zbiry/N.O.V.A. offers the best average placement at 1.99.Consistent compositions minimize bottom 4 finishes and provide steady climbing, even if they don't win lobbies as often.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • Pretendenci/Zbiry: 97.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A.: 96.4% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Zbiry/N.O.V.A.: 95.9% win rate with only 0.3% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Replikatorzy/Mroczne Gwiazdy with a 1.4% pick rate, though its 66.7% win rate suggests it may be over-contested. Arbitrzy/Replikatorzy follows at 1.1% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.

Zgłoś problem

Kompozycje drużynowe TFT - Set 17 FAQ

Jaka jest najlepsza kompozycja TFT w TFT Set 17?

Najlepszą kompozycją TFT w TFT Set 17 jest Pretendenci/Zbiry z Kai'Sa jako głównym carry, osiągając 97.4% współczynnik wygranych i średnie miejsce 2.25. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki i regularnie plasuje się w top 4.

Jak grać kompozycją Pretendenci/Zbiry?

Aby grać Pretendenci/Zbiry, skup się na budowaniu wokół Kai'Sa jako głównego carry. Szukaj Kai'Sa i jednostek wspierających wcześnie, priorytetyzuj przedmioty synergizujące z carry i celuj w szczyt mocy na poziomie 7-8. Ta kompozycja ma 0.1% wskaźnik wyboru, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją.

Które kompozycje są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?

Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17, Zbiry/N.O.V.A. oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce 1.99. Inne niezawodne opcje to Zbiry/N.O.V.A. (śr. 2.06) i Zbiry/N.O.V.A. (śr. 2.08). Stabilne kompozycje minimalizują końcówki w bottom 4 i zapewniają stałą wspinaczkę.

Jaka jest najłatwiejsza kompozycja TFT do grania?

Pretendenci/Zbiry to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 97.4% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.

Kiedy forsować kompozycję vs być elastycznym w TFT Set 17?

W TFT Set 17, Replikatorzy/Mroczne Gwiazdy ma 1.4% wskaźnik wyboru, co oznacza że jest mocno rywalizowana. Jeśli widzisz innych grających nią, rozważ pivot do alternatyw jak Pretendenci/Zbiry. Forsuj kompozycję gdy trafisz wczesne jednostki i przedmioty, lub gdy nie jest rywalizowana. Bądź elastyczny gdy 2+ graczy rywalizuje o te same jednostki.