Składy TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate
Ta tabela przedstawia składy drużynowe TFT Double Up z najwyższym winrate, pomagając Tobie i Twojemu partnerowi zidentyfikować najskuteczniejsze składy do wspinaczki. Top 8-bohaterowe składy Double Up Set 17: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler prowadzi z 74.19% win rate i 3.37 średnią pozycją. N.O.V.A. podąża z 67.65% win rate. Analiza 68 8-bohaterowych składów Double Up ze statystykami wydajności w czasie rzeczywistym.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.37 Avg Place | 74.19% Top 4 Rate | 24.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.53 Avg Place | 67.65% Top 4 Rate | 12.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 63.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.51% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 58.06% Top 4 Rate | 19.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 67.57% Top 4 Rate | 21.62% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 58.33% Top 4 Rate | 11.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.65 Avg Place | 62.97% Top 4 Rate | 21.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.91 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 18.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.02 Avg Place | 59.09% Top 4 Rate | 13.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.05 Avg Place | 58.62% Top 4 Rate | 11.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 69.77% Top 4 Rate | 16.28% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 58.46% Top 4 Rate | 15.38% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 62.45% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.08 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 56.88% Top 4 Rate | 16.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.84 Avg Place | 55.97% Top 4 Rate | 18.66% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 37.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.25% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 61.63% Top 4 Rate | 15.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 14.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 49.02% Top 4 Rate | 10.83% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 10.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 42.42% Top 4 Rate | 3.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.00 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.31 Avg Place | 49.20% Top 4 Rate | 16.04% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.80% Top 4 Rate | 8.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.24 Avg Place | 54.45% Top 4 Rate | 10.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 46.77% Top 4 Rate | 6.45% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 15.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.59 Avg Place | 48.87% Top 4 Rate | 11.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.77 Avg Place | 45.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.39% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.36 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 15.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 46.15% Top 4 Rate | 10.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.69 Avg Place | 45.24% Top 4 Rate | 16.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.80 Avg Place | 40.96% Top 4 Rate | 9.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.00 Avg Place | 32.35% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.14 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.22 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.73 Avg Place | 47.13% Top 4 Rate | 8.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.71 Avg Place | 44.12% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.63 Avg Place | 36.84% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
- | 5.18 Avg Place | 32.97% Top 4 Rate | 7.14% First Place | Moderately Contested | |||
4.81 Avg Place | 37.21% Top 4 Rate | 13.95% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 62.50% Top 4 Rate | 19.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 39.39% Top 4 Rate | 9.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.95% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.03 Avg Place | 36.21% Top 4 Rate | 8.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 8.33% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.21 Avg Place | 34.15% Top 4 Rate | 9.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.37 Avg Place | 32.61% Top 4 Rate | 8.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.30 Avg Place | 32.54% Top 4 Rate | 7.69% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.23 Avg Place | 32.14% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.83 Avg Place | 18.75% Top 4 Rate | 4.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.95 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.24 Avg Place | 29.41% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.36 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 28.26% Top 4 Rate | 4.35% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.40 Avg Place | 27.91% Top 4 Rate | 9.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 29.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.85% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 23.38% Top 4 Rate | 7.79% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.49 Avg Place | 26.38% Top 4 Rate | 5.51% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 19.49% Top 4 Rate | 4.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 25.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.23% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
6.22 Avg Place | 12.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.17% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.
Składy TFT Double Up - Set 17 FAQ
Jaki jest najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17?
Najlepszy skład TFT Double Up w TFT Set 17 to N.O.V.A./Brawler z Viktor jako głównym carry, osiągający 74.2% winrate i 3.37 średnie miejsce. Ta kompozycja jest skuteczna do wspinaczki z partnerem.
Jak grać skład N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up?
Aby grać N.O.V.A./Brawler w Double Up, koordynuj się z partnerem. Skup się na budowaniu wokół Viktor jako głównego carry. Ten skład ma 0.1% pickrate, co czyni ją relatywnie nierywalizowaną opcją. Koordynuj asysty i wspólne przedmioty z partnerem duo.
Jakie składy Double Up są dobre do wspinaczki w TFT Set 17?
Dla stabilnych zysków LP w TFT Set 17 Double Up, N.O.V.A./Brawler oferuje najlepsze średnie miejsce na poziomie 3.37. Inne niezawodne opcje to Replicator/N.O.V.A. (śr. 3.51) i Rogue/N.O.V.A. (śr. 3.51). Koordynujcie się z partnerem aby nie rywalizować o te same jednostki.
Jaki jest najłatwiejszy skład TFT Double Up?
N.O.V.A./Brawler to świetna opcja dla graczy szukających łatwiejszej wspinaczki. Z 74.2% współczynnikiem wygranych ale tylko 0.1% wskaźnikiem wyboru, prawdopodobnie nie będziesz rywalizowany, co ułatwia nawigację. Niska rywalizacja oznacza, że możesz naturalnie znaleźć jednostki bez wymuszania pivotów.
Czy mój partner duo i ja powinniśmy grać ten sam skład w Double Up?
W TFT Set 17 Double Up zazwyczaj lepiej jest grać różne składy aby uniknąć rywalizacji o jednostki. Rogue/N.O.V.A. jest najpopularniejszy z 2.1% pickrate. Rozważ aby Twój partner grał N.O.V.A./Brawler jako opcję uzupełniającą.