Pas GigantaKompozycje drużynowe TFT
Składy drużynowe używające Pas Giganta w TFT Set 16.9. Zobacz składy, w których jednostki carry wyposażają ten przedmiot dla maksymalnej efektywności.
Discover the best TFT team compositions that utilize Pas Giganta as a core item on carry champions. Our data shows 58 viable team comps currently building Pas Giganta, with an average win rate of 40.92% across all compositions. The highest performing Pas Giganta comp achieves a 83.71% win rate, primarily featuring Zbiry, N.O.V.A., Tkacze Losu traits with Caitlyn as the item holder. This table displays all team compositions where Pas Giganta is built on a carry unit, sorted by win rate to help you identify the strongest builds. Each comp shows the full team lineup, recommended item builds, active traits, and key performance metrics including placement average, win rate, and pick rate. Use the filters above to toggle between 8 and 9 champion compositions based on your preferred late-game board size.
3.13 Avg Place | 83.71% Top 4 Rate | 11.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
2.91 Avg Place | 83.08% Top 4 Rate | 23.01% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.09 Avg Place | 80.14% Top 4 Rate | 24.47% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.33 Avg Place | 78.54% Top 4 Rate | 17.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.11 Avg Place | 76.34% Top 4 Rate | 22.69% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.32 Avg Place | 74.43% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.26 Avg Place | 74.34% Top 4 Rate | 23.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.43 Avg Place | 68.84% Top 4 Rate | 22.46% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.74 Avg Place | 67.43% Top 4 Rate | 11.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.90 Avg Place | 67.28% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.79 Avg Place | 64.92% Top 4 Rate | 9.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.17 Avg Place | 61.21% Top 4 Rate | 4.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.76% Top 4 Rate | 9.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.42 Avg Place | 56.12% Top 4 Rate | 4.32% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.26 Avg Place | 56.01% Top 4 Rate | 6.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.39 Avg Place | 54.39% Top 4 Rate | 5.10% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.35 Avg Place | 54.23% Top 4 Rate | 2.99% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.49 Avg Place | 50.70% Top 4 Rate | 8.80% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.49 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 10.50% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.47 Avg Place | 49.34% Top 4 Rate | 12.59% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.67 Avg Place | 49.16% Top 4 Rate | 7.66% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.50% Top 4 Rate | 8.90% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.55 Avg Place | 46.72% Top 4 Rate | 8.03% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.70 Avg Place | 44.96% Top 4 Rate | 7.78% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 4.95 Avg Place | 43.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.64% First Place | Low Contested | |||
4.74 Avg Place | 41.55% Top 4 Rate | 7.75% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.04 Avg Place | 39.60% Top 4 Rate | 4.19% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.94 Avg Place | 38.82% Top 4 Rate | 4.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 37.54% Top 4 Rate | 4.31% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.98 Avg Place | 37.35% Top 4 Rate | 3.21% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.20 Avg Place | 34.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.58% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.16 Avg Place | 33.98% Top 4 Rate | 4.30% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.39 Avg Place | 31.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.09% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.67 Avg Place | 30.16% Top 4 Rate | 2.22% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.48 Avg Place | 29.15% Top 4 Rate | 3.24% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.34 Avg Place | 29.00% Top 4 Rate | 7.67% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.44 Avg Place | 28.64% Top 4 Rate | 5.34% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.55 Avg Place | 28.48% Top 4 Rate | 0.43% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
- | 5.47 Avg Place | 27.04% Top 4 Rate | 1.89% First Place | Low Contested | |||
5.55 Avg Place | 26.79% Top 4 Rate | 1.79% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.47 Avg Place | 26.64% Top 4 Rate | 1.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.53 Avg Place | 26.62% Top 4 Rate | 1.18% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.61 Avg Place | 25.68% Top 4 Rate | 2.93% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.85 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 0.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 22.84% Top 4 Rate | 1.85% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.81 Avg Place | 22.16% Top 4 Rate | 1.80% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.73 Avg Place | 21.19% Top 4 Rate | 0.39% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.70 Avg Place | 21.05% Top 4 Rate | 4.68% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.64 Avg Place | 20.73% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.92 Avg Place | 18.91% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.03 Avg Place | 18.59% Top 4 Rate | 1.12% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.02 Avg Place | 17.09% Top 4 Rate | 1.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.16 Avg Place | 16.31% Top 4 Rate | 1.16% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.04 Avg Place | 15.27% Top 4 Rate | 1.15% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.13 Avg Place | 14.01% Top 4 Rate | 0.64% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.97 Avg Place | 11.89% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.17 Avg Place | 8.11% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
6.72 Avg Place | 4.25% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
Pomóż nam utrzymać dokładność! Jeśli zauważysz nieprawidłowe statystyki, brakujące dane lub jakiekolwiek problemy, Twoja opinia bezpośrednio poprawia jakość naszych danych dla całej społeczności.
Kompozycje drużynowe Pas Giganta - Często zadawane pytania
Jaka jest najlepsza kompozycja drużynowa dla Pas Giganta w TFT Set 17?
Najlepsza kompozycja drużynowa z Pas Giganta w TFT Set 17 osiąga 83.71% wskaźnik wygranych z 0.07% wskaźnikiem wyboru. Ta kompozycja używa cech Zbiry, N.O.V.A., and Tkacze Losu i jest wybierana w 0.07% gier z Pas Giganta.
Ile kompozycji drużynowych używa Pas Giganta w TFT?
Istnieje 58 użytecznych kompozycji drużynowych, które często budują Pas Giganta w TFT Set 17. Pas Giganta pojawia się w kompozycjach ze średnim wskaźnikiem wygranych 40.92% na podstawie 39,710 przeanalizowanych łącznych meczy.
Która kompozycja używa Pas Giganta najczęściej w TFT?
Najpopularniejsza kompozycja dla Pas Giganta w TFT Set 17 używa cech Zbiry, N.O.V.A., and Tkacze Losu z 1.91% wskaźnikiem wyboru. Ta kompozycja osiąga 74.43% wskaźnik wygranych i średnią pozycję 3.32.
Która kompozycja z Pas Giganta ma najlepszą średnią pozycję?
Kompozycja Pas Giganta z najlepszą średnią pozycją osiąga 2.91 z cechami Zbiry, N.O.V.A., and Tkacze Losu. Ta kompozycja ma 83.08% wskaźnik wygranych i 0.22% wskaźnik wyboru.
Które cechy dobrze współpracują z Pas Giganta w TFT?
Najlepsze cechy, które synergizują z Pas Giganta w TFT Set 17, to Zbiry, N.O.V.A., Tkacze Losu, Bastion, Odkupiciel, and Kosmofaza. Te kombinacje cech pojawiają się w kompozycjach drużynowych z najwyższymi wskaźnikami wygranych Pas Giganta.