门侍
胜率
55.6%
场次
314
KDA
3.60
玩家伤害
33,321

门侍 vs 希弗vs 希弗

技能等级所有技能等级
场次5,432
版本6540
最后更新2026年6月2日

门侍 在 Deadlock 中以出色的 55.6% 胜率压制 希弗。在 314 场游戏中,门侍 平均获得 5.4 次击杀和 -502 额外的玩家伤害每场比赛。这个有利的对位允许激进的玩法和早期战斗机会。

MetaBot 桌面版
实时游戏内覆盖层
加入我们的 Discord
反馈Bug、功能建议与开发者交流
加入 Discord

门侍对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看门侍对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
门侍 - 55.6% win rate in this matchup
门侍
55.6% 胜率
VS
希弗 vs 门侍 matchup - 44.3% win rate
希弗
44.3% 胜率

门侍 vs 希弗对线谁赢?

门侍 wins the 门侍 vs 希弗 matchup
获胜者
门侍
比赛: 314
55.6%
胜率
44.3%
5.4
场均击杀
7.7
5.2
场均死亡
7.0
13.5
场均助攻
12.0
41,543
场均净资产
39,974
33,321
玩家伤害
33,823
4,822
目标伤害
4,350
100.3
补刀
73.2

门侍 vs 希弗 对战摘要

The 门侍 vs 希弗 matchup in Deadlock is 一边倒的对战. Based on 314 recent matches analyzed, 门侍 wins with a 55.6% win rate compared to 希弗's 44.3%, giving 门侍 a 11.3 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 门侍 consistently outperforms. 门侍 has overwhelming statistical superiority in this matchup. 希弗 should avoid direct confrontation, focus entirely on farm and objectives, and wait for team fight scenarios where individual matchup advantages are diluted.

门侍 vs 希弗 战斗分析

门侍 wins combat stats against 希弗 in Deadlock

门侍 edges out 希弗 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, survivability, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 314 matches analyzed, this 门侍 vs 希弗 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 希弗 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 希弗's favor.

KDA比率
3.60门侍
2.82希弗
The KDA disparity between 门侍 and 希弗 is substantial: 3.60 versus 2.82, a commanding 0.79 point difference that reveals 门侍's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 314 games shows 门侍 consistently outfragging and outliving 希弗 in these encounters. For 希弗 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 门侍 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 门侍's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
5.4门侍
7.7希弗
希弗 substantially outfrags 门侍 in this matchup, averaging 7.7 kills compared to 5.4 — a difference of nearly 2.2 eliminations per match. When 希弗 faces 门侍, the data clearly shows 希弗 finding more fragging opportunities and converting them into kills. 门侍 players should recognize this statistical reality and adjust their approach: play more supportively, focus on enabling teammates, and avoid ego-challenging 希弗 in situations where your team doesn't need you to take that duel.
平均死亡
5.2门侍
7.0希弗
门侍 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 希弗, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 门侍 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 希弗 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
33,321门侍
33,823希弗
Player damage output is remarkably close in the 门侍 vs 希弗 matchup. 门侍 deals 33,321 average damage while 希弗 deals 33,823. This parity indicates both heroes apply similar pressure in fights and contribute comparably to wearing down enemy health pools. When these heroes face off, neither can rely on superior damage output to swing encounters — instead, the deciding factors become ability timing, positioning, and coordination with teammates.
目标伤害
4,822门侍
4,350希弗
Objective damage contribution is similar between 门侍 (4,822) and 希弗 (4,350). Neither hero has a distinct advantage when it comes to taking towers, walkers, or the patron. Team coordination will be more important than hero selection for objective control.

门侍 vs 希弗 经济分析

净资产
41,543门侍
39,974希弗
补刀
100.3门侍
73.2希弗

门侍 generates approximately 1,569 more souls than 希弗 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 门侍 a mid-game advantage. 门侍 secures more last hits (100.3 vs 73.2), while 希弗 leads in denies (3.1 vs 2.2). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

门侍 vs 希弗 推荐装备

门侍 build for 希弗 matchup

门侍对战希弗装备

This winning build for 门侍 against 希弗 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 55.6% win rate against 希弗, these 7 items help 门侍 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 近战蓄力, 虹吸弹, 身躯虚化, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 28,000 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

希弗 build for 门侍 matchup

希弗对战门侍装备

希弗's counter-build against 门侍 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 希弗 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 追猎, 余威回荡, 跑酷大师, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 28,800 souls Knowing 希弗's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于314场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对门侍对战希弗进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

门侍在Deadlock中对26名英雄有利,对11名英雄不利。门侍最强对位是薇妲,胜率60.5%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率43.0%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

门侍 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6540)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
43.05%5583.105.26.032,92240,994
49.09%4763.365.55.835,20142,418
46.15%4703.175.25.832,79241,093
57.67%4573.385.46.134,46642,787
56.25%4253.285.55.833,72543,019
54.92%4183.415.55.733,97842,825
56.68%3983.595.65.434,16542,559
53.82%3953.295.25.833,45342,108
51.50%3903.375.45.933,83241,851
53.47%3803.405.75.734,45242,397
47.89%3793.205.35.733,81441,901
56.90%3723.405.45.734,39642,876
57.31%3703.565.25.432,59741,880
54.41%3673.415.65.834,53442,925
48.54%3673.395.45.833,96442,108
49.25%3623.065.16.034,15640,143
53.48%3413.515.65.634,37842,892
55.14%3183.545.55.535,65843,180
55.59%3143.605.45.233,32141,543
53.90%3073.485.35.533,74142,020
48.53%2923.265.35.734,69042,566
47.83%2893.415.45.734,01143,044
54.14%2843.485.75.835,06244,093
43.15%2703.245.15.532,61941,624
58.68%2653.475.45.532,54941,471
54.08%2643.435.05.531,67341,645
44.09%2363.265.15.732,86641,205
58.00%2233.575.55.534,33342,429
52.02%2223.235.05.735,16842,948
60.50%2123.575.85.532,78342,378
57.63%1843.535.65.836,59843,691
57.96%1803.155.15.832,16141,480
53.29%1763.315.35.633,90541,509
59.15%1743.415.45.834,20543,420
55.06%1683.425.55.634,45641,527
50.00%1653.284.65.432,15240,627
47.92%1563.055.16.132,70441,447

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

门侍对位 - 常见问题

门侍在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

门侍最好的对阵是对抗薇妲,达到60.5%的胜率。门侍通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

门侍在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

门侍最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有43.0%的胜率。对抗此对手时,门侍应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

门侍有多少有利的对阵?

门侍在Deadlock中有26个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和11个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩门侍?

在门侍的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在门侍的对阵中关注什么属性?

在门侍对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。