门侍
胜率
48.1%
场次
1,969
KDA
3.29

门侍 vs 口袋 vs 口袋

技能等级
所有技能等级
场次
9,547
版本
6757
最后更新
2026年10月7日 UTC

门侍 在这个 Deadlock 对位中对 口袋 面临 48.1% 胜率的挑战。来自 1,969 场游戏的数据显示 门侍 平均有 -1.2 更多的死亡。专注于安全农业、队伍协调和避免 1v1 对抗。

门侍对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看门侍对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
门侍 - 此对线中48.1%胜率
门侍
48.1% 胜率
VS
口袋 vs 门侍对线 - 51.4%胜率
口袋
51.4% 胜率

门侍 vs 口袋对线谁赢?

口袋赢得门侍 vs 口袋对线
获胜者
口袋
比赛: 1,969
48.1%
胜率
51.4%
4.8
场均击杀
6.1
5.7
场均死亡
7.0
14.1
场均助攻
13.2
45,403
场均净资产
46,471
32,255
玩家伤害
41,799
4,335
目标伤害
6,374
101.4
补刀
108.8

门侍 vs 口袋 对战摘要

The 门侍 vs 口袋 matchup in Deadlock is 适度有利的对战. Based on 1,969 recent matches analyzed, 口袋 wins with a 51.4% win rate compared to 门侍's 48.1%, giving 口袋 a 3.3 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in objective contribution, where 口袋 consistently outperforms. 口袋 holds a meaningful advantage in this matchup. 门侍 players should play more cautiously, prioritize safe farming, and look for team fight opportunities where positioning and coordination matter more than 1v1 statistics.

门侍 vs 口袋 战斗分析

口袋 wins combat stats against 门侍 in Deadlock

口袋 edges out 门侍 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in kill production, damage output, objective damage. With only a 3-2 margin based on 1,969 matches analyzed, this 门侍 vs 口袋 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 门侍 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 门侍's favor.

KDA比率
3.29门侍
2.78口袋
门侍 demonstrates noticeably stronger kill-death-assist performance against 口袋, maintaining a 3.29 KDA versus 2.78. This 0.51 point gap reflects 门侍's superior ability to secure eliminations while avoiding death in these head-to-head encounters. 口袋 players facing 门侍 should prioritize team coordination over solo aggression — look for 2v1 situations, coordinate ability usage with teammates, and focus on trading rather than taking isolated duels where 门侍's statistical advantage becomes most pronounced.
平均击杀
4.8门侍
6.1口袋
口袋 secures approximately 1.4 more kills per match than 门侍 in this head-to-head (6.1 vs 4.8). Over the course of a typical match, this translates to 口袋 contributing several additional eliminations to their team's efforts. The gap indicates 口袋's playstyle or kit provides slightly better kill-securing opportunities, though 门侍 can compensate through superior objective focus, team fight positioning, or clutch performances.
平均死亡
5.7门侍
7.0口袋
门侍 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 口袋, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 门侍 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 口袋 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
32,255门侍
41,799口袋
The damage differential between 口袋 and 门侍 is exceptional: 41,799 compared to just 32,255. 口袋 deals 9,544 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 口袋's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 门侍 struggles to even trade effectively. 门侍 players should treat 口袋 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
4,335门侍
6,374口袋
口袋 contributes 2,040 more objective damage than 门侍 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 口袋 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 门侍 should focus on creating picks while 口袋 pushes objectives.

门侍 vs 口袋 经济分析

净资产
45,403门侍
46,471口袋
补刀
101.4门侍
108.8口袋

口袋 generates approximately 1,068 more souls than 门侍 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 口袋 a mid-game advantage. 口袋 secures more last hits (108.8 vs 101.4), while 口袋 leads in denies (3.0 vs 2.6). These farming dynamics shape the lane equilibrium and gold distribution.

门侍 vs 口袋 推荐装备

门侍 build for 口袋 matchup

门侍对战口袋装备

This optimized build for 门侍 against 口袋 is designed to help overcome a statistically challenging matchup. Facing a 51.9% win rate disadvantage against 口袋, these items prioritize survivability and efficient trading to close the gap. 秘术余波, 灵力灌注, 幸免于难, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 35,200 souls Focus on hitting item timings and avoid extended fights until you've completed key items that can shift the matchup in your favor.

口袋 build for 门侍 matchup

口袋对战门侍装备

口袋's recommended build against 门侍 leverages their statistical advantage in this matchup. With the matchup favoring 口袋, these items emphasize aggressive play and damage output to secure the advantage. 魔毯, 痛苦脉冲, 金刚宝衫, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 36,000 souls Understanding 口袋's likely build helps you anticipate their power spikes and adjust your timing accordingly.

这些装备构建是基于1,969场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对门侍对战口袋进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

MetaBot Desktop

围绕门侍组建最强队伍

阵容实验室用数十万场对局的真实胜率为你队中每一对英雄打分,对照敌方阵容检验你的选择,并一键载入经过验证的高胜率阵容。

  • 六人阵容面板
  • 双人协同胜率
  • 验证过的高胜率阵容
MetaBot Desktop 中的 Deadlock 阵容实验室

门侍在Deadlock中对1名英雄有利,对36名英雄不利。门侍最强对位是无双魔术师,胜率51.3%。最难对位是格瑞墓,胜率39.9%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

门侍 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6757)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
44.45%4,4653.234.85.831,60643,709
48.26%3,7603.304.75.731,58143,945
45.52%3,7393.154.85.931,89244,247
44.11%3,4783.134.96.132,40744,180
44.97%3,4723.314.85.732,01844,581
49.21%3,4223.304.75.731,81244,705
48.59%3,3743.224.75.832,12044,792
39.89%3,2613.124.75.731,35644,213
45.87%3,2123.254.95.833,24244,838
40.53%3,0463.054.65.730,12743,833
48.82%2,9443.244.85.832,64044,935
40.42%2,7033.174.85.831,66944,468
43.53%2,6813.134.75.932,61244,235
47.76%2,6373.274.95.831,93044,256
48.06%2,5553.264.85.731,61144,327
43.14%2,5413.264.95.733,35245,200
42.66%2,5353.064.66.032,13843,619
41.53%2,5343.124.75.832,71544,059
48.69%2,5043.334.95.731,86744,754
45.45%2,4073.024.76.030,55044,354
48.54%2,3853.244.85.832,69944,469
42.50%2,3733.004.55.932,60343,771
43.45%2,2673.324.65.531,86543,563
46.42%2,1513.214.95.832,27844,689
46.01%2,1313.224.85.831,37943,352
44.86%2,0343.234.96.032,71944,529
45.14%2,0323.064.76.131,18843,521
48.13%1,9693.294.85.732,25545,403
48.35%1,8253.184.85.731,71144,202
51.34%1,5453.414.85.631,83644,540
49.10%1,5163.334.95.732,68845,255
45.25%1,4923.254.85.731,11443,670
40.45%1,4603.074.45.732,31143,603
47.52%1,3603.354.85.632,02144,363
44.91%1,3203.084.65.831,22244,725
49.15%1,2553.224.75.732,29045,054
47.11%1,1843.234.45.430,75344,585
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

门侍对位 - 常见问题

门侍在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

门侍最好的对阵是对抗无双魔术师,达到51.3%的胜率。门侍通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

门侍在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

门侍最难的对阵是对抗格瑞墓,仅有39.9%的胜率。对抗此对手时,门侍应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

门侍有多少有利的对阵?

门侍在Deadlock中有1个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和36个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩门侍?

在门侍的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在门侍的对阵中关注什么属性?

在门侍对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。