门侍
胜率
54.7%
场次
58
KDA
4.36
玩家伤害
32,285

门侍 vs 口袋vs 口袋

技能等级所有技能等级
场次6,796
版本6530
最后更新2026年5月27日

门侍 基于 58 场 Deadlock 比赛维持对 口袋 的 54.7% 胜率优势。门侍 平均获得 1,103 更多的净资产,转化为更早的物品强势期。在经济优势周围玩耍以最大化这个对位。

门侍对线分析

使用下拉菜单选择对手,查看门侍对阵他们的详细数据分析。您将获得对战胜率、战斗统计、净资产对比和伤害分析——基于真实的Deadlock排位数据。

与对手进行对比
门侍 - 54.7% win rate in this matchup
门侍
54.7% 胜率
VS
口袋 vs 门侍 matchup - 46.3% win rate
口袋
46.3% 胜率

门侍 vs 口袋对线谁赢?

门侍 wins the 门侍 vs 口袋 matchup
获胜者
门侍
比赛: 58
54.7%
胜率
46.3%
6.4
场均击杀
6.2
4.7
场均死亡
6.1
14.1
场均助攻
12.1
44,057
场均净资产
42,953
32,285
玩家伤害
39,801
5,083
目标伤害
7,108
102.4
补刀
98.7

门侍 vs 口袋 对战摘要

The 门侍 vs 口袋 matchup in Deadlock is 显著的统计优势. Based on 58 recent matches analyzed, 门侍 wins with a 54.7% win rate compared to 口袋's 46.3%, giving 门侍 a 8.4 percentage point advantage. The most significant statistical gap is in fragging power, where 门侍 consistently outperforms. 门侍 dominates this matchup statistically. 门侍 can play aggressively and look for solo kills, while 口袋 should focus on minimizing losses, farming safely, and relying on teammates to even the odds.

门侍 vs 口袋 战斗分析

门侍 wins combat stats against 口袋 in Deadlock

门侍 edges out 口袋 in a competitive combat comparison, winning 3 of 5 metrics with notable advantages in KDA efficiency, kill production, survivability. With only a 3-2 margin based on 58 matches analyzed, this 门侍 vs 口袋 matchup remains contestable for both sides. 口袋 shouldn't feel outmatched — the statistical gap is narrow enough that individual skill, positioning choices, and in-game decision making can easily swing specific encounters in 口袋's favor.

KDA比率
4.36门侍
2.98口袋
The KDA disparity between 门侍 and 口袋 is substantial: 4.36 versus 2.98, a commanding 1.38 point difference that reveals 门侍's dominance in direct combat exchanges. This matchup data from 58 games shows 门侍 consistently outfragging and outliving 口袋 in these encounters. For 口袋 players, the strategic implication is clear: avoid 1v1 gunfights against 门侍 whenever possible. Instead, leverage team utility, information gathering, and multi-person pushes to neutralize 门侍's mechanical advantage.
平均击杀
6.4门侍
6.2口袋
Kill production between 门侍 and 口袋 is virtually identical, with 门侍 averaging 6.4 kills per game and 口袋 securing 6.2. This parity suggests both heroes are equally capable of finding frags in this matchup, and outcomes depend more heavily on objective play, ability usage, and team coordination than raw elimination numbers. Players should focus on impactful kills — lane denials, objective fights, and trading — rather than simply padding their kill count.
平均死亡
4.7门侍
6.1口袋
门侍 demonstrates markedly better survivability against 口袋, recording fewer deaths per game. Dying less frequently gives 门侍 significantly more impact potential — more opportunities for multi-kills, more presence in objective fights, and more economic stability from staying alive. 口袋 players face a survival deficit that compounds throughout a match, making disciplined positioning and smart disengagements crucial.
玩家伤害
32,285门侍
39,801口袋
The damage differential between 口袋 and 门侍 is exceptional: 39,801 compared to just 32,285. 口袋 deals 7,516 more damage per game on average, indicating absolute dominance in direct combat exchanges. This level of disparity suggests 口袋's kit, typical playstyle, or positioning patterns give them massive advantages in dealing damage while 门侍 struggles to even trade effectively. 门侍 players should treat 口袋 as a must-avoid duel and focus entirely on non-combat contributions or ability-based damage.
目标伤害
5,083门侍
7,108口袋
口袋 contributes 2,025 more objective damage than 门侍 on average, making them more valuable for split pushing, securing guardian kills, and accelerating tower takes. Teams with 口袋 may want to prioritize objective-focused strategies. 门侍 should focus on creating picks while 口袋 pushes objectives.

门侍 vs 口袋 经济分析

净资产
44,057门侍
42,953口袋
补刀
102.4门侍
98.7口袋

门侍 generates approximately 1,103 more souls than 口袋 on average. This moderate economic edge translates to earlier power spikes and item completions, giving 门侍 a mid-game advantage. Both heroes farm at comparable rates, so lane control will depend on harassment patterns and jungle support rather than inherent farming advantages.

门侍 vs 口袋 推荐装备

门侍 build for 口袋 matchup

门侍对战口袋装备

This winning build for 门侍 against 口袋 focuses on maximizing your statistical advantages in this favorable matchup. With a 54.7% win rate against 口袋, these 7 items help 门侍 press the advantage and close out games efficiently. 治疗仪式, 缴械魔咒, 英雄光环, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 20,000 souls The build includes high-value items that scale well into the late game. Farm efficiently and look for opportunities to extend your lead before completing these power spikes.

口袋 build for 门侍 matchup

口袋对战门侍装备

口袋's counter-build against 门侍 attempts to mitigate the matchup disadvantage through smart itemization. Facing an unfavorable matchup, 口袋 players typically prioritize items that help them survive and scale. 幸免于难, 金刚宝衫, 灵力高涨, and 4 more items, totaling approximately 28,000 souls Knowing 口袋's likely itemization helps you exploit windows where they're weaker and predict their item timing.

这些装备构建是基于58场竞技比赛的胜率数据,针对门侍对战口袋进行优化的。在Deadlock中,装备选择对对战结果有显著影响——正确的构建可以帮助克服统计劣势或扩大现有优势。请根据游戏状态、团队阵容、敌方装备以及你在灵魂方面是领先还是落后来调整你的构建。

门侍在Deadlock中对29名英雄有利,对8名英雄不利。门侍最强对位是哈雷黛,胜率69.7%。最难对位是卡厉可,胜率36.7%。使用下表查找具体对位详情和出装推荐。

门侍 matchup win rates and combat stats in Deadlock (Version 6530)
对手
胜率
场次
KDA
击杀
死亡
玩家伤害
净资产
59.20%1313.735.25.133,79041,758
50.00%1163.785.04.732,29239,993
54.46%1113.786.15.239,80843,457
58.00%1053.815.35.033,93541,411
56.44%1043.975.24.832,93840,681
55.29%933.805.25.033,55941,307
59.09%923.985.24.934,01441,071
45.88%893.955.84.834,40841,964
55.13%854.045.94.835,55541,839
61.64%834.395.64.533,44341,615
59.21%823.865.35.134,46942,051
52.00%823.615.45.235,55841,808
40.54%793.275.15.632,50340,343
55.71%773.605.85.137,78342,456
58.90%774.315.44.329,13338,241
52.86%754.145.34.434,39140,861
58.21%754.525.74.636,69041,731
67.16%724.515.84.433,49441,316
48.57%723.755.44.735,49941,551
48.48%723.735.15.233,73840,726
47.54%653.595.85.333,95141,534
60.71%613.545.45.432,85642,260
51.85%593.515.35.134,59541,256
66.67%583.946.15.437,86244,942
54.72%584.366.44.732,28544,057
54.72%564.225.34.332,64640,336
52.94%553.744.84.834,44342,060
48.98%533.595.25.237,52841,836
56.41%473.135.15.733,98041,801
54.76%444.346.04.833,20240,284
53.66%433.235.05.533,00441,978
50.00%433.865.55.130,35041,159
43.24%423.524.84.730,28338,961
62.50%424.015.84.835,59741,283
52.50%423.144.95.427,35638,562
69.70%373.314.75.529,85241,470
36.67%353.035.14.932,73437,976

下载 MetaBot 桌面应用

通过实时覆盖层、自动游戏检测和即时统计数据提升你的游戏体验。

游戏内覆盖层自动游戏检测多游戏支持个人仪表盘
立即下载免费下载
🔍

Help us maintain accuracy! If you notice incorrect stats, missing data, or any issues, your feedback directly improves the quality of our data for the entire community.

Report an Issue

门侍对位 - 常见问题

门侍在Deadlock中最好的对阵是什么?

门侍最好的对阵是对抗哈雷黛,达到69.7%的胜率。门侍通过优越的战斗属性和有利的能力交互在此对阵中表现出色。

门侍在Deadlock中最难的对阵是什么?

门侍最难的对阵是对抗卡厉可,仅有36.7%的胜率。对抗此对手时,门侍应专注于队伍协调和防守物品化。

门侍有多少有利的对阵?

门侍在Deadlock中有29个有利的对阵(50%+胜率)和8个不利的对阵。理解这些对阵动态有助于你做出更好的英雄选择并调整你的玩法。

我应该如何在困难的对阵中玩门侍?

在门侍的困难对阵中,优先考虑安全补刀、位置和队伍协调。调整你的装备构建以补偿对阵劣势,并寻找机会通过能力而不是直接对抗来影响对战。

我应该在门侍的对阵中关注什么属性?

在门侍对阵中要分析的关键属性包括胜率、KDA比率、平均玩家伤害和净资产差异。高伤害对阵倾向于侵略性玩法,而低KDA对阵表明玩法更防守和依赖队伍支援。