Höchste Erstplatzierungsrate TFT Double Up Kompositionen

Diese Tabelle hebt TFT Double Up Teamkompositionen mit den höchsten Erstplatzierungsraten hervor, perfekt für Duos die ihre Gewinnchancen maximieren wollen. Top 8-Champion Double Up Set 17 Kompositionen: N.O.V.A. (50.0% WR, 4.0 avg), N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), Replicator (63.0% WR, 3.7 avg). N.O.V.A./Fateweaver führt mit 50.00% Siegesrate und 4.00 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. N.O.V.A. folgt mit 74.19% Siegesrate. Analyse von 68 8-Comp Double Up Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.

Primary
Champions
Builds
AvgTop 4First
Contested Risk
4.00
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
25.00%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.37
Avg Place
74.19%
Top 4 Rate
24.19%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.65
Avg Place
62.97%
Top 4 Rate
21.20%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.91
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
18.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.43
Avg Place
50.00%
Top 4 Rate
17.39%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.89
Avg Place
56.88%
Top 4 Rate
16.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.75
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
20.00%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
46.67%
Top 4 Rate
15.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.09
Avg Place
58.46%
Top 4 Rate
15.38%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.69
Avg Place
58.06%
Top 4 Rate
19.35%
First Place
Low Contested
4.69
Avg Place
45.24%
Top 4 Rate
16.67%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.08
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
14.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
67.57%
Top 4 Rate
21.62%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.93
Avg Place
58.33%
Top 4 Rate
11.67%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.81
Avg Place
37.21%
Top 4 Rate
13.95%
First Place
Severely Contested
3.83
Avg Place
62.45%
Top 4 Rate
16.49%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.02
Avg Place
59.09%
Top 4 Rate
13.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.77
Avg Place
45.54%
Top 4 Rate
13.39%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.53
Avg Place
67.65%
Top 4 Rate
12.75%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.96
Avg Place
63.83%
Top 4 Rate
8.51%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.97
Avg Place
39.39%
Top 4 Rate
9.09%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.31
Avg Place
49.20%
Top 4 Rate
16.04%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.82
Avg Place
62.50%
Top 4 Rate
19.64%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.89
Avg Place
61.63%
Top 4 Rate
15.59%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.51
Avg Place
69.77%
Top 4 Rate
16.28%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.36
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
15.44%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.65
Avg Place
47.80%
Top 4 Rate
8.29%
First Place
Highly Contested
3.84
Avg Place
55.97%
Top 4 Rate
18.66%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.22
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Moderately Contested
3.99
Avg Place
60.00%
Top 4 Rate
14.00%
First Place
Low Contested
4.24
Avg Place
54.45%
Top 4 Rate
10.68%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.59
Avg Place
48.87%
Top 4 Rate
11.65%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.05
Avg Place
58.62%
Top 4 Rate
11.49%
First Place
Low Contested
5.12
Avg Place
42.42%
Top 4 Rate
3.03%
First Place
Low Contested
4.30
Avg Place
52.17%
Top 4 Rate
10.87%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.80
Avg Place
40.96%
Top 4 Rate
9.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.49
Avg Place
46.15%
Top 4 Rate
10.26%
First Place
Low Contested
5.13
Avg Place
33.33%
Top 4 Rate
5.56%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.21
Avg Place
34.15%
Top 4 Rate
9.76%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
25.00%
Top 4 Rate
5.95%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.40
Avg Place
27.91%
Top 4 Rate
9.30%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.37
Avg Place
32.61%
Top 4 Rate
8.70%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.03
Avg Place
36.21%
Top 4 Rate
8.62%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.49
Avg Place
26.38%
Top 4 Rate
5.51%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.44
Avg Place
49.02%
Top 4 Rate
10.83%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.30
Avg Place
32.54%
Top 4 Rate
7.69%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.02
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
8.33%
First Place
Highly Contested
4.14
Avg Place
57.14%
Top 4 Rate
19.05%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.80
Avg Place
20.00%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.95
Avg Place
41.67%
Top 4 Rate
6.67%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.68
Avg Place
46.77%
Top 4 Rate
6.45%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.52
Avg Place
25.81%
Top 4 Rate
3.23%
First Place
Moderately Contested
4.73
Avg Place
47.13%
Top 4 Rate
8.49%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.57
Avg Place
29.13%
Top 4 Rate
4.85%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.24
Avg Place
29.41%
Top 4 Rate
5.88%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.00
Avg Place
32.35%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.83
Avg Place
18.75%
Top 4 Rate
4.17%
First Place
Highly Contested
5.87
Avg Place
19.49%
Top 4 Rate
4.24%
First Place
Severely Contested
4.71
Avg Place
44.12%
Top 4 Rate
8.82%
First Place
Low Contested
5.52
Avg Place
28.26%
Top 4 Rate
4.35%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.87
Avg Place
23.38%
Top 4 Rate
7.79%
First Place
Moderately Contested
6.22
Avg Place
12.70%
Top 4 Rate
3.17%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.19
Avg Place
37.50%
Top 4 Rate
6.25%
First Place
Moderately Contested
-
5.18
Avg Place
32.97%
Top 4 Rate
7.14%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.57
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
2.86%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.36
Avg Place
28.57%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Severely Contested
5.63
Avg Place
36.84%
Top 4 Rate
5.26%
First Place
Moderately Contested
5.23
Avg Place
32.14%
Top 4 Rate
0.00%
First Place
Highly Contested

TFT Set 17 Meta Analysis

This page displays 68 team compositions sorted by first place rate to find compositions with the highest potential to win lobbies, based on 9.9K games analyzed from ranked matches. The current meta shows an average win rate of 44.5% and average placement of 4.68 across all tracked compositions.

Top Performing Compositions

The highest win rate composition is N.O.V.A./Brawler with Viktor as the primary carry, achieving a 74.2% win rate. Following closely is Replicator/N.O.V.A. at 69.8% win rate, and N.O.V.A./Brawler at 67.6%. These compositions represent the strongest options in the current meta for players looking to maximize their LP gains.

Playstyle Breakdown

Understanding how each composition plays helps you choose the right one for your game state:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Jax
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler (Late Game): scales into late game with consistent top 4 finishes — build around Viktor

Best for Winning Lobbies

If your goal is to win first place rather than just top 4, consider N.O.V.A./Fateweaver which achieves first place in 25.0% of games. With only a 0.1% pick rate, this composition is rarely contested.

Hidden Gems - Uncontested Picks

These compositions have above-average win rates but low pick rates, making them excellent choices when your primary composition is contested:

  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 74.2% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • Replicator/N.O.V.A.: 69.8% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate
  • N.O.V.A./Brawler: 67.6% win rate with only 0.1% pick rate

Meta Contestation

The most popular composition is Rogue/N.O.V.A. with a 2.1% pick rate, and it maintains a strong 61.6% win rate despite high contestation. Challenger/N.O.V.A. follows at 1.4% pick rate. When multiple players contest the same composition, consider pivoting to less popular alternatives to improve your odds.

Get the MetaBot Desktop App

Level up your gameplay with real-time overlays, automatic game detection, and instant stats — all on your desktop.

In-game overlaysAuto game detectionMulti-game supportPersonal dashboard
Download NowFree download
🔍

Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.

Problem melden

TFT Double Up Comps - Set 17 FAQ

Was ist die beste TFT Double Up Comp in TFT Set 17?

Die beste TFT Double Up Comp in TFT Set 17 ist N.O.V.A./Brawler mit Viktor als Hauptcarry mit einer 74.2% Siegesrate und 3.37 Durchschnittsplatzierung. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen mit einem Partner.

Wie spiele ich die N.O.V.A./Brawler Comp im Double Up?

Um N.O.V.A./Brawler im Double Up zu spielen, koordiniere dich mit deinem Partner. Konzentriere dich darauf Viktor als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Diese Comp hat eine 0.1% Pickrate, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht. Koordiniere Unterstützungen und geteilte Items mit deinem Duo-Partner.

Welche Double Up Comps eignen sich zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set 17?

Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 Double Up bietet N.O.V.A./Brawler die beste Durchschnittsplatzierung bei 3.37. Weitere zuverlässige Optionen sind Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Ø 3.51) und Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Ø 3.51). Koordiniert euch um euch nicht gegenseitig zu kontesten.

Was ist die einfachste TFT Double Up Comp?

N.O.V.A./Brawler ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 74.2% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.

Sollten mein Duo-Partner und ich die gleiche Comp im Double Up spielen?

In TFT Set 17 Double Up ist es generell besser verschiedene Comps zu spielen um keine Einheiten zu kontesten. Rogue/N.O.V.A. ist am beliebtesten mit 2.1% Pickrate. Erwäge dass dein Partner N.O.V.A./Brawler als ergänzende Option spielt.