Beste Durchschnittsplatzierung TFT Double Up Kompositionen
Diese Tabelle rankt TFT Double Up Teamkompositionen nach ihrer durchschnittlichen Platzierung und zeigt welche Comps konstant Top-Platzierungen erreichen. Top 8-Champion Double Up Set 17 Kompositionen: N.O.V.A. (74.2% WR, 3.4 avg), N.O.V.A. (67.6% WR, 3.5 avg), N.O.V.A. (63.8% WR, 4.0 avg). N.O.V.A./Brawler führt mit 74.19% Siegesrate und 3.37 durchschnittlicher Platzierung. N.O.V.A. folgt mit 67.65% Siegesrate. Analyse von 68 8-Comp Double Up Kompositionen mit Echtzeit-Leistungsstatistiken.
Primary | Champions | Builds | Avg | Top 4 | First | Contested Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.37 Avg Place | 74.19% Top 4 Rate | 24.19% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.53 Avg Place | 67.65% Top 4 Rate | 12.75% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.96 Avg Place | 63.83% Top 4 Rate | 8.51% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.65 Avg Place | 62.97% Top 4 Rate | 21.20% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.69 Avg Place | 58.06% Top 4 Rate | 19.35% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.93 Avg Place | 58.33% Top 4 Rate | 11.67% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 67.57% Top 4 Rate | 21.62% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 56.88% Top 4 Rate | 16.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.91 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 18.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.05 Avg Place | 58.62% Top 4 Rate | 11.49% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.00 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 25.00% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.02 Avg Place | 59.09% Top 4 Rate | 13.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.51 Avg Place | 69.77% Top 4 Rate | 16.28% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.08 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 14.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.09 Avg Place | 58.46% Top 4 Rate | 15.38% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
3.83 Avg Place | 62.45% Top 4 Rate | 16.49% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
3.99 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 14.00% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
3.84 Avg Place | 55.97% Top 4 Rate | 18.66% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.89 Avg Place | 61.63% Top 4 Rate | 15.59% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.75 Avg Place | 60.00% Top 4 Rate | 20.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.13 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.30 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 10.87% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.19 Avg Place | 37.50% Top 4 Rate | 6.25% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.43 Avg Place | 50.00% Top 4 Rate | 17.39% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 46.67% Top 4 Rate | 15.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.44 Avg Place | 49.02% Top 4 Rate | 10.83% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.31 Avg Place | 49.20% Top 4 Rate | 16.04% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.12 Avg Place | 42.42% Top 4 Rate | 3.03% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.14 Avg Place | 57.14% Top 4 Rate | 19.05% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.59 Avg Place | 48.87% Top 4 Rate | 11.65% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.24 Avg Place | 54.45% Top 4 Rate | 10.68% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.68 Avg Place | 46.77% Top 4 Rate | 6.45% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.65 Avg Place | 47.80% Top 4 Rate | 8.29% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.36 Avg Place | 52.17% Top 4 Rate | 15.44% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.77 Avg Place | 45.54% Top 4 Rate | 13.39% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.22 Avg Place | 33.33% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.81 Avg Place | 37.21% Top 4 Rate | 13.95% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.69 Avg Place | 45.24% Top 4 Rate | 16.67% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.49 Avg Place | 46.15% Top 4 Rate | 10.26% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
4.80 Avg Place | 40.96% Top 4 Rate | 9.56% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
3.82 Avg Place | 62.50% Top 4 Rate | 19.64% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.02 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 8.33% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.03 Avg Place | 36.21% Top 4 Rate | 8.62% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.73 Avg Place | 47.13% Top 4 Rate | 8.49% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
4.71 Avg Place | 44.12% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Low Contested | ||||
5.63 Avg Place | 36.84% Top 4 Rate | 5.26% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
- | 5.18 Avg Place | 32.97% Top 4 Rate | 7.14% First Place | Moderately Contested | |||
5.80 Avg Place | 25.00% Top 4 Rate | 5.95% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.00 Avg Place | 32.35% Top 4 Rate | 8.82% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
4.95 Avg Place | 41.67% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.21 Avg Place | 34.15% Top 4 Rate | 9.76% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.23 Avg Place | 32.14% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.24 Avg Place | 29.41% Top 4 Rate | 5.88% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
4.97 Avg Place | 39.39% Top 4 Rate | 9.09% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.30 Avg Place | 32.54% Top 4 Rate | 7.69% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.36 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 0.00% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.37 Avg Place | 32.61% Top 4 Rate | 8.70% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.40 Avg Place | 27.91% Top 4 Rate | 9.30% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.83 Avg Place | 18.75% Top 4 Rate | 4.17% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 28.26% Top 4 Rate | 4.35% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 23.38% Top 4 Rate | 7.79% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 29.13% Top 4 Rate | 4.85% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.49 Avg Place | 26.38% Top 4 Rate | 5.51% First Place | Highly Contested | ||||
5.80 Avg Place | 20.00% Top 4 Rate | 6.67% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.87 Avg Place | 19.49% Top 4 Rate | 4.24% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.57 Avg Place | 28.57% Top 4 Rate | 2.86% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
6.22 Avg Place | 12.70% Top 4 Rate | 3.17% First Place | Severely Contested | ||||
5.52 Avg Place | 25.81% Top 4 Rate | 3.23% First Place | Moderately Contested | ||||
Helfen Sie uns, die Genauigkeit zu verbessern! Wenn Sie falsche Statistiken, fehlende Daten oder Probleme bemerken, hilft Ihr Feedback direkt dabei, die Qualität unserer Daten für die gesamte Community zu verbessern.
TFT Double Up Comps - Set 17 FAQ
Was ist die beste TFT Double Up Comp in TFT Set 17?
Die beste TFT Double Up Comp in TFT Set 17 ist N.O.V.A./Brawler mit Viktor als Hauptcarry mit einer 74.2% Siegesrate und 3.37 Durchschnittsplatzierung. Diese Komposition ist effektiv zum Aufsteigen mit einem Partner.
Wie spiele ich die N.O.V.A./Brawler Comp im Double Up?
Um N.O.V.A./Brawler im Double Up zu spielen, koordiniere dich mit deinem Partner. Konzentriere dich darauf Viktor als Hauptcarry aufzubauen. Diese Comp hat eine 0.1% Pickrate, was sie zu einer relativ unumkämpften Option macht. Koordiniere Unterstützungen und geteilte Items mit deinem Duo-Partner.
Welche Double Up Comps eignen sich zum Aufsteigen in TFT Set 17?
Für konstante LP-Gewinne in TFT Set 17 Double Up bietet N.O.V.A./Brawler die beste Durchschnittsplatzierung bei 3.37. Weitere zuverlässige Optionen sind Replicator/N.O.V.A. (Ø 3.51) und Rogue/N.O.V.A. (Ø 3.51). Koordiniert euch um euch nicht gegenseitig zu kontesten.
Was ist die einfachste TFT Double Up Comp?
N.O.V.A./Brawler ist eine großartige Option für Spieler, die einen einfacheren Aufstieg suchen. Mit einer Siegrate von 74.2% aber nur 0.1% Pickrate wirst du wahrscheinlich nicht umkämpft, was das Spiel einfacher zu navigieren macht. Geringe Konkurrenz bedeutet, dass du deine Einheiten natürlich findest, ohne Pivots erzwingen zu müssen.
Sollten mein Duo-Partner und ich die gleiche Comp im Double Up spielen?
In TFT Set 17 Double Up ist es generell besser verschiedene Comps zu spielen um keine Einheiten zu kontesten. Rogue/N.O.V.A. ist am beliebtesten mit 2.1% Pickrate. Erwäge dass dein Partner N.O.V.A./Brawler als ergänzende Option spielt.